Skip to comments.
Common grammar and usage errors
12/22/04
| Self
Posted on 12/22/2004 9:32:13 AM PST by georgiadevildog
I am starting a grammar thread at the behest of Xenalyte and TheMom. Post your most irritating pet peeves of grammar or usage here.
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Education; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: allyourbase; aybabtu; bare; barebutt; bear; bearbutt; beesting; but; butt; cheese; computergeeks; geeks; grammar; grammer; grammergeeks; hammer; hi; high; howardhuges; huge; hugh; hughhefner; hughjackman; loose; lose; loss; me; meandmike; mike; mikeandme; mine; moose; moosecheese; saycheese; series; serious; spellinbe; spellingbeehive; stupidvanity; their; there; usage; whatyousay; your; youre
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-211 next last
To: georgiadevildog
"Here, here" as a gesture of agreement to the comments of another, I don't know which to use. How about "Hear here!!"?
61
posted on
12/22/2004 10:09:24 AM PST
by
jellybean
(Free 'Ole Crusty!)
To: escapefromboston
I don't agree. Homophones played little, if any, role in our WWII victory in Europe. They may have played a small, albeit important, role in the Pacific Theatre, but only because they were forced to.
62
posted on
12/22/2004 10:09:37 AM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
("Just because you were born stupid doesn't give you any right to be stupid!" - Paul Watson to Makahs)
To: general_re
Someone beat me to it!
I got that and responsed "What the hell is a looser?"
63
posted on
12/22/2004 10:09:44 AM PST
by
Dan from Michigan
("BZZZZZT You are fined one credit for violation of the Verbal Morality Statute")
To: Dan from Michigan
I was responding to a previous post. Guy said someone once called him a "looser." I determined that a "looser" must be someone who regularly looses something.
loose: verb: to free something
64
posted on
12/22/2004 10:09:58 AM PST
by
georgiadevildog
(Get to work. You aren't being paid to believe in the power of your dreams.)
To: Chad Fairbanks
Well Homophones fought bravely during the American Revolution and if it wasn't for them we might be speaking English right now!
To: ItsOurTimeNow
My 3-year-old demands "Kneaded Bicuits Plain!" for supper.
66
posted on
12/22/2004 10:11:01 AM PST
by
Tax-chick
(Jesus is the reason for the season which begins at sundown on December 24.)
To: georgiadevildog
None of those is really a "4," if you enunciate.
67
posted on
12/22/2004 10:11:46 AM PST
by
Tax-chick
(Jesus is the reason for the season which begins at sundown on December 24.)
To: Chad Fairbanks
Why are you giving
homonyms a pass?
Homophones are all talk, but homonyms mean it!
68
posted on
12/22/2004 10:11:58 AM PST
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: escapefromboston
Ha! No one has spoken English here in America for a long time. ;0)
Gnome sayin'?
69
posted on
12/22/2004 10:12:55 AM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
("Just because you were born stupid doesn't give you any right to be stupid!" - Paul Watson to Makahs)
To: georgiadevildog
I think "myself" is VERY badly misused; see following:
Myself should not be used as a substitute for the personal object pronoun me. This is a common mistake, as in the following example:
They gave presents to my brother and myself.
The correct form is:
They gave presents to my brother and me.
So, when should you use the word? The golden rule is that you should only use myself if the word I comes before it in the same sentence. When this is the case, the word is used in the following situations:
Firstly, when the subject and object of the sentence are the same:
I know myself.
I saw myself in the mirror.
Secondly, when you want to emphasise, or call more attention to the subject of the sentence:
I did the job myself. (Nobody helped me).
I ate all the cake myself. (Nobody else ate any).
70
posted on
12/22/2004 10:13:05 AM PST
by
NRA1995
("Yew jes' go and lay yore hand on a Pittsburgh Steelers fan & Ah think yer gonna fin'lly understand")
To: Mr. K
Because "to eggs" refers to one concept....yes, I considered that, but I decided that the "to" were two many, not "to" was two many.
Confused yet? I am.
Sure am glad I started this thread. This is fun.
71
posted on
12/22/2004 10:13:08 AM PST
by
georgiadevildog
(Get to work. You aren't being paid to believe in the power of your dreams.)
To: headsonpikes
Don't even get me started on Homonyms. Filthy things.
72
posted on
12/22/2004 10:13:20 AM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
("Just because you were born stupid doesn't give you any right to be stupid!" - Paul Watson to Makahs)
To: Tax-chick
LMAO...that's awesome!
"What happened TO my preposition?
I took it ON an expedition.
Put it BY the thing I fish IN.
Got infected WITH a skin condition!"
73
posted on
12/22/2004 10:13:44 AM PST
by
ItsOurTimeNow
(Proud knuckle-dragging, Bible-thumping, redneck Dinosaur)
To: Senior Chief
Yes! The word "irregardless" should be stricken from the record, regardless of context and irrespective of usage.
I actually had a fight with someone about whether this was even a word. I said it wasn't, and I was wrong, it's in the dictionary, but it's a stupid word. Webster defines it as "a blend of irrespective and regardless". What kind of definition is that?
To: Tax-chick
Please ad me two yore type-o ping list.
Eye cold rely us a chuckal from tyme 2 tyme.
Thanx. ;-)
75
posted on
12/22/2004 10:16:51 AM PST
by
Semper Vigilantis
(Localize welfare & social programs & see how fast things change!)
To: general_re
76
posted on
12/22/2004 10:17:00 AM PST
by
rocksblues
(RINO's = McCain, Lott, Collins, Hagel, Coleman ! developing)
To: Chad Fairbanks
I thought a homophone was queer phone sex.
77
posted on
12/22/2004 10:17:14 AM PST
by
NRA1995
("Yew jes' go and lay yore hand on a Pittsburgh Steelers fan & Ah think yer gonna fin'lly understand")
To: NRA1995
Re: "myself":
Good one. Thanks for bringing this one to light.
I was once putting together a report for a college class. I was writing the report as part of a group, and my assignment was to write my section and put it together with their sections in the whole report.
One of my group members handed me his section of the report, and in it was the word "theyself." For example, "This design allows one person to perform the task by theyself."
I almost choked.
78
posted on
12/22/2004 10:17:29 AM PST
by
georgiadevildog
(Get to work. You aren't being paid to believe in the power of your dreams.)
To: NRA1995
I never thought of that. It may be worse than I had imagined!
79
posted on
12/22/2004 10:18:03 AM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
("Just because you were born stupid doesn't give you any right to be stupid!" - Paul Watson to Makahs)
To: ItsOurTimeNow
Oh, I love that! It reminds me of a story I read in a home schooling newsletter. The mother was teaching a child grammar, and said, "The prepositional phrase is 'behind the bookcase'." A younger child walked out of the room, then came back and said, "No, it isn't! There's nothing behind the bookcase but dust-bunnies!"
80
posted on
12/22/2004 10:18:18 AM PST
by
Tax-chick
(Jesus is the reason for the season which begins at sundown on December 24.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-211 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson