Posted on 08/01/2026 11:52:23 AM PDT by DFG
AUGUSTA, ME — The Democratic Party of Maine explained to voters that they can do "no rape" or "no incest", but not both.
After carefully reviewing the slate of possible Democratic Senate candidates in Maine, party leaders informed voters that they'll simply have to settle for one or the other.
"What do these people expect from us when they say we can't run a rapist?" said party leader Mike Prather. "Once you take all of the rapists out of the equation, it's just a bunch of liberals sleeping with their cousins. Those are your options, Maine. Honestly, we're getting pretty frustrated with these voters and their ridiculous expectations. Deal with it, people."
Despite the party's statement, some voters have remained hopeful that at least one Democrat could be found that had not committed rape or incest. "Surely, there's one liberal in this state who hasn't slept with his cousin or committed sexual assault," said local woman Denise Gaines. "I just have to believe we have at least one non-rape, non-incest option. I'm not giving up yet."
At publishing time, the state Democratic Party of Maine had announced the discovery of a "no rape or incest" candidate, but with the caveat that he died in 1902.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Sadly, the ‘Rats already stand for “Any Twosome” the next step is polygamy.
😃
So this is why Susan Collins has been so quiet. She is following Rule #4: When your opponent is committing suicide, stand back and do nothing.
Susan Collins looks like Julius Caesar next to them.
Can we then treat them as bad as the Mormons were historically treated?
In before the “so what? it’s legal” and “they’re ONLY second cousins” FReakers start their schtick.
Gives a whole new meaning to the city name Bangor.
Can we then treat them as bad as the Mormons were historically treated?
But I find it interesting that despite easily having a large enough population to become a state, Utah was not admitted until their President, Prophet, Seer, and Revelator publicly renounced polygamy.
In the 1890s the American political mainstream was confident enough in our culture to refuse to allow such a foreign concept of morals and religion to become a part of America until it agreed to our norms. Such a stance now is considered ‘dangerously right wing’.
“Can we then treat them as bad as the Mormons were historically treated?”
____________________________________________________________
Only when they go to war against the United States like the Mormons did.
Mainers are some salt-water breathing commie sickos.
(Don't flame me. They're out there and we all know it.)
Yes, Utah became part of the US just a couple of years after the Mormons settled there. But some Mormons fought for the US during the Mexican War (to raise money for the migration to Utah).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.