Posted on 10/15/2024 2:10:18 PM PDT by DFG
HOUSTON, TX — As the world still celebrated the astonishing accomplishment of SpaceX catching its returning Starship, NASA officials were baffled at how Elon Musk managed to succeed without as many gay non-binary Muslim dwarfs of color as they have.
SpaceX's historic achievement occurred despite not making diversity and inclusion its top priority, leaving NASA in awe that such a feat could be pulled off without the mandated involvement of underrepresented people groups.
"Not a single transgender dwarf of color on the team! How does this guy do it?" one high-ranking NASA official marveled. "We devote all of our time and spend billions upon billions of dollars to put together the most intersectional and diverse team, but we can't even come close to the stuff Musk is pulling off at SpaceX. They caught a rocket, for crying out loud! And they didn't have any non-binary Hindu furries working on the project! How is that possible?"
Decision-makers at NASA reportedly held emergency closed-door meetings this week to discuss the widening gap between their work and the things being done at SpaceX. "It doesn't matter what we do, he just keeps pulling further ahead," a NASA insider said. "We're going to keep trying to incorporate more diversity, equity, and inclusion to everything we do, but it's like this guy has cracked some code where he just puts the most brilliant and qualified minds to work on his projects. That sounds crazy, but I guess it's working out for them."
At publishing time, NASA sources still expressed skepticism that Musk would be able to successfully land a human being on Mars without the help of any gender-fluid atheist amputees of mixed racial descent.
LOL
To be fair, I think blond haired blue eyed folks like me are in the minority.
But We don’t need any help getting hired :)
Easy, Boeing hired ‘em all.
And this is one of those times.
Bless the BEE!!
nasa=need another scapegoat again...
When NASA first issued the contracts that have led to Crew Dragon and Starliner, Boeing was considered a “sure thing” and SpaceX was considered the “long shot startup”.
My, how times have changed ...
I commented a couple of months ago that is all media was lost except BB, an historian 100 years from now could still get a good idea of what went on in this era.
It surely seems so.
The funny thing about history is the truly radical nature of the internet itself. As Madame Clinton and John Kerry bemoan about "losing control," one finds history is being written through many nodes of communication, and the "official" historians are having a hissy fit already. 100 years from now....
Best wishes.
The sting of the Bee!
Yes reality is a tough competitor for the Bee.
Yes, those are crucial to achieving the ecstasy of intentional failure--which shows the importance of ideology over reality.
And toward that same end, I've often said that just as important are Discrimination, Exclusion, and Incompetence.
For parody to be effective it has to have at least some of its basis in truth.
During the Bush years.
When FR was still in its lovefest for Bush.
Anybody see this degenerate physics dope Degrasse state Space x hasn’t done anything NASA hasn’t already done.
NASA has a chopsticks booster capture in the bag?
NASA has graciously ceased hiring "The Right Stuff" that made NASA great, thus leaving "the best and the brightest" engineers available for Space X to employ.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.