Posted on 09/07/2024 6:26:19 AM PDT by george76
They wanted to know how many people would comply with a complete re-ordering of their lives based on no science at all, just random orders, some of which bordered on absurdity.
I have long said that Covid 19 was launched by design by a small number of people in the globalist predator class for one reason and one reason only — as a beta test for the coming technocratic new world order.
Now, we’ve got the World Economic Forum coming out and all but admitting that was exactly why the Covid-19 “pandemic” had to happen.
The WEF gleefully posted the following snippet to the “My Carbon” page of its website where they make a pitch for so-called smart cities, which is just another term for 15-minute cities.
The first of three “developments” that the WEF says must be in place before the world can evolve into its utopian vision of “smart and sustainable cities,” is compliance with restrictions on our freedom. It writes:
1. COVID-19 was the test of social responsibility – A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world. There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contact-tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility.
They were testing us. That’s what Covid was all about. They wanted to see how many of us would give up our individual freedom and individual sovereignty by complying with a “new normal” that consisted of restrictions bordering on the absurd. Why, for instance was it “safe” to shop at Lowe’s or Home Depot but unsafe to shop at a small business or attend church? Why was it OK to go to strip clubs in Michigan but you couldn’t buy seeds for a garden?
What the WEF is implying with its above statement is that in order to be “sustainable,” people and societies will need to be compliant with a new more authoritarian global order. Don’t ask questions. Don’t resort to logic. Just obey.
Would we be obedient in the face of idiotic new laws and regulations, like wearing face diapers to stop what was said to be an aerosolized virus, and standing six feet apart in public, and submitting to a never-before-used, unlicensed mRNA gene-based injection? They said it was good for you, so roll up your sleeve. Don’t ask questions. If you did, you could lose your job and be treated as a societal outcast. Many people lost friends or even close family members to this monstrous “test” of our willingness to unquestioningly do what we’re told.
Nearly five years later, arguably the most powerful nonprofit public-private partnership in the world, the WEF, admits it was all a test of our wills and celebrates the fact that most of us failed the test (or passed with flying colors depending how you look at it).
They wanted to find out how many of us would prove our servitude to the lawless, fascistic beast system by complying with “unimaginable restrictions,” many of which were created out of thin air with absolutely no scientific evidence to back them up as contributing anything to public health.
...
The U.S. government’s top health bureaucrat, Dr. Anthony Fauci, admitted recently that there was no science behind his decision to require Americans to socially distance six feet apart.
...
They just wanted to see how many of us would prove our fealty to the “authorities,” people wearing white coats or suits and ties.
The beta test known as Covid-19 proved once again the validity of the The Milgram Experiment. This experiment was conducted in 1961-1962 by Yale University professor Stanley Milgram. It showed that the overwhelming majority of Americans would obey a law or command that they knew was wrong if the order were to come from an official authority figure. An alarming 65 percent of Americans would reluctantly violate their own conscience and obey the order even if they knew it would result in the death of an innocent person.
From Wikipedia:
Beginning on August 7, 1961, a series of social psychology experiments were conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram, who intended to measure the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts conflicting with their personal conscience. Participants were led to believe that they were assisting an unrelated experiment, in which they had to administer electric shocks to a “learner.” These fake electric shocks gradually increased to levels that would have been fatal had they been real.
The experiments found, unexpectedly, that a very high proportion of subjects would fully obey the instructions, with every participant going up to 300 volts, and 65% going up to the full 450 volts. Milgram first described his research in a 1963 article in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology[1].
Who fell for it and who did not? It was actually a coup to rid the world of Trump and MAGA.
It was a scamdemic!
Covid was not a fair test. During that time, many people complied only because if they had not, they could have lost their jobs or career choices, or access to various public buildings. Their kids may have been refused enrollment in certain schools or activities.
Many people were refused surgery, even organ transplants if they refused the shot.
Back then, there was no legal recourse for that individual, unless you could afford an attorney to defend your remaining rights. This Covid compliance was not a matter of robotic obedience, at least not in each case.
They blew their wad early, most people won’t go for it again.
I actually believe that COVID tyranny was more driven by elitist cynicism than anything else.
"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard" - Mencken
The WEF forum should be nuked when in session.
Right you are. The governments mandated that businesses institute rules that we peons had to obey, or there would be consequences.
My thoughts exactly.
Klaus Schwab’s World Enslavement Forum is the renamed Nazi party
Wait didn’t Klaus just say he has a few more of these scam crisis coming ?
This statement is absurd on its face, in the context of COVID.
The long-term effect of the COVID fiasco is that it made “smart and sustainable cities” less feasible. Hardly anybody wants to live in a dense urban dump anymore. This country’s largest cities have experienced a large out-migration of population, and an even bigger out-migration of capital, since 2020.
Things to Come
Cedric Hardwicke
That was part of the test. How many would be willingly obedient and how many would have to be threatened with losing their jobs and livelihoods, not being able to enter stores to buy food etc. if they refused the jabs, the masks, the 6 foot distances.
The whole thing was so sick. Nothing has ever recovered.
“a complete re-ordering of their lives based on no science at all, just random orders, some of which bordered on absurdity.”
Like one-way aisles in a grocery store? Or St. Antony Fauci finally admitting that he pulled the 6-foot distancing rule out of his back pocket? And millions wearing China-made masks that did not stop the corona virus?
But there are a lot of sheep out there to lead around. On rare occasion I still see a car driven by someone with a Covid mask on—no passengers!
“World Enslavement Forum”
Nice turn of phrase. (BTW, I’m stealing that.)
Even if one could find an attorney to fight the Covid mandates, too many tyrannical judges were in place and happily enforced the mandates even though doing so denied due process and had no basis in law, but were simply edicts from elected officials and bureaucrats.
Look at the trashing of constitutional rights to speedy trial, due process, and free speech for the January 6 defendants. The withholding of evidence against them with the blessing of the judge. The same for Trump. He is under gag order pertaining to at least one of the cases against him.
With the widespread corruption in the legal system it is difficult to envision things will be any different during the next “crisis”. The day is coming when a liberal majority Supreme Court approves onerous penalties on “hate” speech, gives federal judges and law enforcement the discretion to suspend a “suspect’s” civil liberties for public safety, determines trail by administrative panel can substitute for a jury trial, and approves draconian restrictions on firearm ownership and use.
The day is also coming when the state redistributes personal property and assets on the whim of bureaucrats. The courts already allow civil asset forfeiture. The Supreme Court’s Kelo decision allows private property to be taken and given to other private entities “for the public good”. Compensation for that property taken is what the state determines is appropriate. Certainly leftist social activists, politicians, and bureaucrats are plotting to gain the authority to take private property, without compensation, and redistributed it how they see fit. This is the end game for politicians such as Kamala Harris who constantly preach “equity”. Seizure and redistribution of private property is the end game of the equity advocates.
All I see are hyperventilating about Project 2025 which is simply a conservative think tank blueprint that all think tanks do. The WEF on the other hand has agendas and projects that are pure world of evil legion of doom BS.
It will be the #PureBloods who resist.
I dunno. The WEF is mostly a clown show, a gaggle of midwits engaged in a circle-jerk.
The U.S. Congress, various state legislatures, and the White House are more of a threat to our liberty than these nobodies. I'd have a different list of targets to be "nuked" if it came to that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.