Posted on 11/12/2022 4:13:56 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
Mayo Clinic has declined to consider a kidney transplant for an unvaccinated woman with stage-four kidney disease, she told Alpha News.
That woman, Amy Broten, received a letter Nov. 1 informing her that her kidney transplant evaluation was denied.
“You have medical issues that need to be stabilized and/or improved prior to evaluation. The medical issues include: patient not willing to comply with the transplant team immunization requirements and recommendations,” the letter says.
(Excerpt) Read more at alphanews.org ...
Is the bar set this high before genital mutilation and hormone drug therapy are started for minors who want to be another sex without their legal guardians knowledge?
That’s fine.
But transplants were being done before cv19, without cv19 vaccination. Based on current data, covid is now a greater risk for infection and death for the cv19vxd than it is for the unvxd. And that is just for cv19 itself. The SADS cases are vxd people, not unvxd. And the business end of the virus no longer exists in “wild” cv19 and does not cause cardiovascular issues, while the cv19vx most certainly does produce the spike which causes cardio issues (eg. my Dad, with no prior family history, is suffering cardio and neuro issues post clot shot #3).
You may well be right about the legal. IIRC, courts typically side with the “expert” witnesses, and it is nigh impossible to get an expert certified in Court if he/she is not published and does not have a widely accepted conventional view. We can be sure that both Mayo and Pharma will have their ducks in a row on this. Pharma will be involved for obvious reasons.
The parallel system is probably the only solution. I know you don’t like Dr McCullough, but we love him. And we’re going to do whatever we can to protect MDs like him.
Will they require the vaccine for medically assisted suicide?
That’s some of the best instant karma of the shamdemic. You can see the impact of the hand of God slam her into the floor. Amazingly entertaining!
Non-compliance with what you mentioned is one thing.
She’s absolutely within her rights to choose not to take something that is not at all associated with her kidney transplant.
They are only trying to coerce her into getting vaxxed and for no good reason. The vax does not prevent her from catching Covid nor transmitting it. The claims that it will keep her from getting as sick as if she were unvaxxed are suspect, to say the least.
Tell the lady about niacin + sodium bicarbonate, and she may not need the transplant. https://orthomolecular.activehosted.com/index.php?action=social&chash=e2c0be24560d78c5e599c2a9c9d0bbd2.207&s=77f52ed726743110a305ac91e563254c
God will not be mocked.
Her body, her choice. Isn’t that what the feminists tell us?
This is how TPTB kill you off.
Hope she finds a place that isn’t run by covidogma.
Probably no recourse unless there is a Nuremberg II. Your medical establishment has destroy most thinking people’s trust in the whole medical system and profession. Not an emotional attack; simply a statement of fact.
I do not like McCullough because he lied about his credentials which got him thrown off staff. THis was the issue. I also think he is wrong.
However, I think that in an expert war you must present something more than conjecture for a ruling — the calling for Nurenberg style trials is over the top and is easily discredited as fringe — eventhough the passion runs high.
I think McCullough sold out as did Tenpenny. However, I do think there are non-biased physicians who could make the argument.
I disagree that SADS is entirely attributable to “the jab” — The best weighting of the evidence would suggest that myocarditis and pericarditis of vaccination origin is brief, and self limited. There were prety notable cases of pericarditis and myocarditis prior to vaccination as a symptom of CoVID infection — that is hard to get around from a legal perspective.
I think vaccination at this time is unwarranted in healthy and young people (young being up to the age of 65). I think COVID in the vast majority of cases has settled into inconvenient and not fatal — ergo vaccination is not necessary. The other thing is that transplant is standardized across medical (transplant) centers — this may not be a requirement of Mayo, but of the transplant system itself. I will try to find out.
The Mayo clinic will be sued for billions once the evidence of the death clot shot is entered into record in a court of law.
This is an irresponsible statement and should be ignored by anyone with renal disease — it is in fact very dangerous
God is not being mocked. One would perhaps argue that transplant is forbidden by old testament law. Your statement is a total nonsequitur.
“I think vaccination at this time is unwarranted in healthy and young people (young being up to the age of 65). I think COVID in the vast majority of cases has settled into inconvenient and not fatal — ergo vaccination is not necessary.”
Excellent summary of who/when should not be vaccinated and who might be considered.
These docs of death really think they can get away with medical malpractice and evil.
It’s exactly stories like this that makes peoples hearts wax cold and is bringing on the Son of Perdition who will probably start his executions with these very doctors to please the plebs.
Very interesting; and thank you.
SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to be a health care problem throughout the US, affecting the candidates, recipients, and donors of organ transplants, the transplant staff, and, to a variable degree, every hospital and every person in the country. Although therapeutic options have increased, the best available tool to mitigate the severity of COVID-19 disease is vaccination. It has been the COVID Strike Force’s consistent recommendation that all candidates, recipients (and family members), and live donors of organ transplant, in addition to transplant staff and physicians, receive an approved vaccine. This recommendation is to permit the continued practice of clinical organ transplant procedures with the lowest morbidity risk to the candidates, recipients, and those of us who care for them. Some centers (ours included) have made a policy that requires SARS-CoV-2 vaccination before a candidate’s registration on the national organ waiting list. The arguments for vaccine mandates are numerous1 but have been polarizing.
It appears that the vaccinations for listing are up to the individual transplant center -- so this is good (and actually surprises me)
This is notable, however, About 60% of transplant centers in a recent survey reported that patients are not required to have COVID-19 vaccinations prior to surgery. “Only 35.7% of centers reported implementing a vaccine mandate, while 60.7% reported that vaccination was not required,” Benjamin E. Hippen, MD, and colleagues wrote in a recent issue of the American Journal of Transplantation. “A minority (42%) of responding centers with a vaccine mandate for transplant candidates also mandated vaccination for living organ donors.”
So it appears that there is choice. Mayo is quite conservative and academic -- it does not surprise me that they require vaccination for listing on transplant list. In my judgment, as I know the amount of immunosuppresion for transplant, I would recommend the bivalent vaccination (I think the risks are outweighed by the benefits), but I am glad it is not mandatory at all centers -- if the patient in the article does not want the vaccine, then it stands to reason she could find a center that is more in line with her personal beliefs
Mayo clinic in jacksonville also won injunctive relief against a family insisting on ivermectin. There is no likelihood based on current survey of rulings and legal rulings that would suggest you are correct — there is currently (i am not saying it is right) immunity for the makers of vaccination against statutory damages. It will not be entered into a court of law in the foreseeable future. Also, it is unlikely that Mayo would not defend this lawsuit which would likely lead to precedent devastating to your position of advocacy.
You probably do not know the required elements for a judgment of malpractice. No malpractice is being committed — better arguments would be to focus on efficacy issues with vaccination. However, your call for violence and your painting off physicians with whom you disagree as evil is not favorable to your position.
I am of the belief that judgment belongs to the Lord, and that the Christian is commanded to preach the love of Christ and the Spirit...while you do not preach love or kindness but only for those with whom you might agree. Clearly not Christian by action.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.