I do not like McCullough because he lied about his credentials which got him thrown off staff. THis was the issue. I also think he is wrong.
However, I think that in an expert war you must present something more than conjecture for a ruling — the calling for Nurenberg style trials is over the top and is easily discredited as fringe — eventhough the passion runs high.
I think McCullough sold out as did Tenpenny. However, I do think there are non-biased physicians who could make the argument.
I disagree that SADS is entirely attributable to “the jab” — The best weighting of the evidence would suggest that myocarditis and pericarditis of vaccination origin is brief, and self limited. There were prety notable cases of pericarditis and myocarditis prior to vaccination as a symptom of CoVID infection — that is hard to get around from a legal perspective.
I think vaccination at this time is unwarranted in healthy and young people (young being up to the age of 65). I think COVID in the vast majority of cases has settled into inconvenient and not fatal — ergo vaccination is not necessary. The other thing is that transplant is standardized across medical (transplant) centers — this may not be a requirement of Mayo, but of the transplant system itself. I will try to find out.
“I think vaccination at this time is unwarranted in healthy and young people (young being up to the age of 65). I think COVID in the vast majority of cases has settled into inconvenient and not fatal — ergo vaccination is not necessary.”
Excellent summary of who/when should not be vaccinated and who might be considered.