Posted on 09/29/2022 5:37:56 PM PDT by Yo-Yo
This is what Ginni Thomas read in her statement to the January 6 committee:
"First, I want to thank the Committee for your patience as I recovered from hip replacement surgery."
"Second, I am here voluntarily to answer questions about my activities regarding the 2020 election, which, I think you will find were minimal and mainstream."
"However, as my counsel has expressed, I am concerned that there may be more than a few questions about my husband’s work, which I do not believe is within the scope of this committee’s jurisdiction."
"Since I was the Nebraska College Republican Chair in my twenties, long before I met my husband in 1986, I have been active in political/public policy work."
"Moreover, while I have a law degree, I am not licensed to practice law, nor have I ever practiced law, nor have I ever worked on any litigation at the Supreme Court or any court for that matter. I work only in the political lane."
"As Justice Breyer said this last week, it is 2022 and women can have professional and separate careers from their judicial spouses."
"Since he became a judge in 1990, my husband has only worked in the legal arena, not politics."
"I can guarantee that my husband has never spoken with me about pending cases at the Court. It’s an iron-clad rule in our home."
"Additionally, he is uninterested in politics. And I generally do not discuss with him my day-to-day work in politics, the topics I am working on, who I am calling, emailing, texting, or meeting."
"Regarding the 2020 election, I did not speak with him at all about the details of my volunteer campaign activities. And I did not speak with him at all about the details of my post-election activities, which were minimal, in any event."
"I am certain I never spoke with him about any of the legal challenges to the 2020 election, as I was not involved with those challenges in any way."
"And I know he was completely unaware of my texts with Mark Meadows until this Committee leaked them to the press while he was in a hospital bed fighting an infection."
"Let me also add, it is laughable for anyone who knows my husband to think I could influence his jurisprudence – the man is independent and stubborn, with strong character traits of independence and integrity."
"I am now happy to answer questions. "
The minute one of the fools brings up her husband, she should just get up and leave.
May God surround her with the armor of God and May she easily outwit those bottom feeders.
Best part of her statement.
She voiced concerns about election fraud, so the Greek chorus keeps saying (without evidence) “without evidence.”
If she brought some clips of the 2000 mules blot box stuffing, they wouldn’t be able to say “without evidence”
May God surround her with the armor of God and May she easily outwit those bottom feeders.
AMEN!!!! Go Ginny......you’re an intelligent lady so let the fools have it.......they won’t know what hit them since their combine IQ’s are less than 30.
“If it wasn’t clear before that the January 6th committee was a thinly-veiled cover for investigating and destroying all decent Republicans, it is now after Ginni’s powerful opening statement.”
It’s been clear since Day One.
Amen.
Amen!
Everyone on that Jan 6 committee should be charged with sedition.
I pray she’s as sharp as her husband. Could be game-changing.
Amen ❤ 🙏
You can tell they are desparate now they’re dragging in Mrs. Thomas. Why would a SC’s spouse be relevant?
They would love to impeach Justice Thomas. That is why they are going after his wife. Plain as day. Scum of DC swamp. I do hope Cheney burns in hell.
She should read out these URLs to begin her testimony.
https://hereistheevidence.com/
Folks, you need to push back on the “no evidence” nonsense any chance you get.
Amen
#15: Thank you!
“May God surround her with the armor of God and May she easily outwit those bottom feeders.”
AMEN!
Or lift an elegant manicured middle finger in their direction...
Since Justice Thomas had a classical education, would it not be fun for him to utter a few Latin curses to their faces.....?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.