If it wasn't clear before that the January 6th committee was a thinly-veiled cover for investigating and destroying all decent Republicans, it is now after Ginni's powerful opening statement.
1 posted on
09/29/2022 5:37:56 PM PDT by
Yo-Yo
To: Yo-Yo
The minute one of the fools brings up her husband, she should just get up and leave.
2 posted on
09/29/2022 5:45:26 PM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
(DJT24)
To: Yo-Yo
May God surround her with the armor of God and May she easily outwit those bottom feeders.
3 posted on
09/29/2022 5:47:57 PM PDT by
McGavin999
(A sense of humor is a sign of intelligence, leftists have no sense of humor, therefore………)
To: Yo-Yo
... he was completely unaware of my texts with Mark Meadows until this Committee leaked them to the press ...Best part of her statement.
4 posted on
09/29/2022 5:48:18 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(The Democrat Party is criminal, unAmerican and illegitimate )
To: Yo-Yo
She voiced concerns about election fraud, so the Greek chorus keeps saying (without evidence) “without evidence.”
If she brought some clips of the 2000 mules blot box stuffing, they wouldn’t be able to say “without evidence”
5 posted on
09/29/2022 5:52:04 PM PDT by
Fido969
(45 is Superman! )
To: Yo-Yo
“If it wasn’t clear before that the January 6th committee was a thinly-veiled cover for investigating and destroying all decent Republicans, it is now after Ginni’s powerful opening statement.”
It’s been clear since Day One.
7 posted on
09/29/2022 6:27:46 PM PDT by
ought-six
(Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule. )
To: Yo-Yo
I pray she’s as sharp as her husband. Could be game-changing.
11 posted on
09/29/2022 7:17:29 PM PDT by
SomeCallMeTim
( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!it)
To: Yo-Yo
You can tell they are desparate now they’re dragging in Mrs. Thomas. Why would a SC’s spouse be relevant?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson