Posted on 09/23/2022 7:55:05 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
A debate between two major party candidates is supposed to be one on one. However, during the September 22 debate between the candidates for Arizona Secretary of State, it quickly devolved into a three against one situation when the two debate moderators joined the Democrat candidate in attacking Mark Finchem as you can see. Their antipathy towards Finchem is more than obvious especially in contrast to their utter lack of any challenges to the Democrat candidate.
PING!
Conservatives agree to let these animals ‘moderate’ debates - so they get what they ask for.
I’ve never seen a debate where the moderator jumped in and helped the Republican defeat the Democrat. How odd that it’s always the other way around.
EVERY political debate should have two moderators, one picked by each candidate. That’s both simple, and fair. Every GOP candidate should insist on it. But for some reason we always surrender.
Honestly. How many times? It’s so predictable that it’s not even falling for a trick. By agreeing to a debate “moderated “ by MSM hacks, this happens every single time.
Kari Lake would take those odds gladly, actually, as long as Hobbs were there as well.
Wow, they media talking heads don’t even pretend to be “fair” although they did use the word fair in their intro.
The mods are Mexican Supremacists shilling for fellow Reconquistador Adrian Fontes.
Ricardo Ruelas - now masquerading as “Richard” Ruelas - has been with the screaming leftist rag “Arizona Republic” for decades as one of their house dogs barking at the Americans.
And that’s what the real issue is in Arizona: will Mexico be able to rule the gringos like they do in California?
Conservatives agree to let these animals ‘moderate’ debates - so they get what they ask for.
~~~
I heard on the Radio this morning that both republicans JD Vance and Mike DeWine recently rejected doing debates put on by the ‘Ohio Debate Commission’ (sounds all official doesn’t it) because the chair person is a know partisan democrat.
These people institutionalize cheating, from rigging polls and owning the media to infiltrating (or just creating) non-partisan sounding organizations and using them to tilt the field.
I didn’t watch it and won’t. Did the GOP candidate at least point out the obvious bias?
League of Women Voters pioneered this technique.
Even the placement of the chairs is telling.
Not sure. I watched a few minutes of a 6 minute clip. it was all I could take. the dimocrat candidate sat silent the entire time I watched. Amazing how the “reporters/moderators” took over and kept attacking without any realization at all. It’s like they thought it was their job to “fact check” and debate on behalf of the dimocrat candidate.
Until the GOP says no debates until we get honest broker moderators this crap will continue. If you want a typical MSM moderator that is fine, we get Mark Levin as a counter. He can ask normal questions as long as your lackey plays fair, if they stray and start shilling for the Democrat candidate Levin unleashes on the Democrat and the other moderator.
Yes, it’s ALL about rigging the “elections”.
Adrian Fontes is the most crooked politician in Arizona!
Unlike most crooks, he is actually very smart!
He singlehandedly changed election procedures in Maricopa county to get Democrat’s wins in 2018 and 2020!
Like, you could supposedly be able to erase your vote if you make mistake!
When confronted, he said, where it is written that that is prohibited!?
I fear him as AG!
Frankly, I am not that much fan of Finchem either, but we all MUST vote for him, otherwise AZ is DONE!
Did they ever ask the Democrat any questions? 😋
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.