Posted on 07/11/2022 6:14:03 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
This is just grandstanding. No one would withhold an abortion if it’s really an emergency situation for the mother.
Everyone has the right to self-defense, even if it’s your own child trying to kill you.
Everyone’s yearbooks! :-D
Remember last week they teed up with story of 10 year old who was raped...of course no surprise that turned out to be bogus.
My man Ken Paxton will sue BoBo’s goatsmellin’ ass. Get the pig Ken!
I thought Biden said it’s wrong to withhold medical care from people, forcing them to travel to another state to get help.
I’d like SCOTUS to take up whether CMS can blackmail hospitals whenever things aren’t going to administration’s liking...like I posted earlier, vax mandates as well as “emergency” abortion—who knows what other issues they have used withholding of funds to get their way.
Good point!
yawn...he’s full of baloney.
They are going to take care of the Mothers anyway, grandstanding like he is doing something. And this is Blackmail and probably not legal.
Federal law has been wiped out.
SCOTUS wiped it out. Corrected their heinous error.
Dictator
Sounds like BS like the 10 y.o. rape victim that had to travel out of state to get an abortion. I can’t imagine a situation that required an “emergency abortion” that wouldn’t be covered under existing law.
“No law denies abortion to save the mothers life…”
Exactly correct. Claiming the opposite is a lie just to whip up more hate and division. There is a big difference between saving the life of the mother and saving the HEALTH of the mother. The latter could be the stress brought on by the pregnancy.
Legislate, Congress.
When you think your poll numbers aren’t low enough...
Portland Catholic hospitals are woke.
So now “reproductive rights” is considered emergency medical care? And “Medicare” is somehow specifically connected to all of this?
Maybe I’m overthinking this article, the more I read it, the more bizarre it becomes.
Are we witnessing yet another ‘Old man yells at clouds’ scenario?
Are C sections now illegal?
A woman is in danger…does the doctor perform an emergency C section or an abortion?
And you would be wrong like most mush heads who couldn’t read a legal brief to save their lives.
How about you read up on the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) then get back to the class on how life saving procedures are not explicitly mandated in that act to include terminations should the life of the mother be in danger. I’ll wager a months pay you fail to construct a legitimate legal argument let alone find precedence in case law to refute exactly what the Federal government just reminded the hospitals they are bound by Federal law to do with the full weight of the Federal supremacy clause firmly in the gov side here.
Only if they wanted a boy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.