Posted on 01/07/2022 9:18:30 AM PST by Enterprise
Yesterday, Maricopa County released a 93-page response to the Arizona Senate audit.
The auditors identified hundreds of thousands of illegal ballots. They discovered internet connectivity on the Elections Management Server, deleted elections files, and several more election law violations.
The County denied every claim, but they finally admitted, a year after the election, to double voting and double-counted ballots.
All evidence from the Senate audit was delivered to Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich and Arizona voters are still waiting for justice.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Oh don't y'all make no never mind. I'm just sitting here in my pumpkin patch waiting for the decertification of elections in counties where there was fraud.
Yep. Lemme know when someone goes to jail
Republican cowards...
“Arizona voters are still waiting for justice”
Gonna be a long wait
It’s the ‘double-counting’ that stole the election. People need to watch that video out of Atlanta when the witnesses were ushered out, in a sober state of mind. That only needed to happen in 5 cities... that is what happened to Trump’s victory.
im innocent i tell ya
The Maricopa county board that obstructed the audit and destroyed evidence is 4 GOP, 1 Democrat.
The Big Steal was completely BIPARTISAN!
Nothing to see here folks. The tv told me this was already debunked as a ‘conspiracy theory.’ Please go back to your American Idol tv shows.
What recourse do the people have when elections don’t mean anything?
Peoplpe shoukd be going to jail, but I can’t hold my breath on that.
We’re a fraudulently elected government.
"Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." ― attributed to Joseph Stalin.
Washington Post said everything was goody good and super duper fair.
Gracious sakes alive.... finally.
Now every supervisor should resign and go to jail.
The uniparty at work.
Well, you could very well be right and often the simplest explanation for something is the true explanation.
However, this is how I think it might have been done:
1) The Democrats got the Registered Voter lists (legally).
2) They went through these lists and found the people who were not likely to vote at all because they hadn't voted in the last n Presidential elections.
3) They filled out and submitted mail-in ballots for many of these people, as many as they thought they needed with some margin to spare.
Election officials crosschecked the ballots with the registered voters and found that most lined up. The few where the real voter really did vote were set aside as Provisional Ballots, where they mostly just canceled each other out.
There were many Precinct's with just unheard of voter turnout numbers, waaaaaaaay more than usual. In fact, some had voter turnouts that exceeded 100% but this raised nary an eyebrow among the MSM (see Tagline).
Some are still waiting for the decertification of the 1960 Kennedy election.
3) They filled out and submitted mail-in ballots for many of these people, as many as they thought they needed with some margin to spare.
BOOM! Except your missing the point here. They had to have a list of voters, which you listed. Then they had to have REAL TIME feedback of whom had ALREADY voted. There was always a chance that people would vote, so to prevent a mass of double ballots, they had to have real time feedback. Yes, they probably voted for conservatives!!! They just had to know they hadn’t voted in elections recently and that they hadn’t yet voted.
I find it MOST interesting, that somehow Democrats believe this is Democracy!!! ROFLOL. This is NOT democracy, and the Republic is dead when people think it is. What happened isn’t ballot harvesting. It’s just plain voter fraud, concealed by Ballot Harvesting. That is the danger of Ballot Harvesting in that it conceals massive illegal voting.
The experts said it wasn’t real, the risk of voter fraud with ballot harvesting. I am thinking that probably all of those experts were democrats....
What was the adjudication rate for every machine in AZ?
For each adjudication, who made the final changes based on logged data?
Still waiting for the basic answers to these simple questions. Why is this not public knowledge?
If you can't trust the word of a Bezos newspuppet, who can you trust?
Never mind lists. Did you not read anything the auditors said? Thousands of ballots, for instance, were printed on the wrong paper. The type of paper is a matter of very clear law in AZ. This means that a truck load of ballots were printed as cast BEFORE the election. The hoodlums couldn’t even get that right since they didn’t throw out enough legitimate ballots to avoid obvious over-counting.
Just the wrong paper problem alone should invalidate the county election results. And where is Wendy Rogers?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.