3) They filled out and submitted mail-in ballots for many of these people, as many as they thought they needed with some margin to spare.
BOOM! Except your missing the point here. They had to have a list of voters, which you listed. Then they had to have REAL TIME feedback of whom had ALREADY voted. There was always a chance that people would vote, so to prevent a mass of double ballots, they had to have real time feedback. Yes, they probably voted for conservatives!!! They just had to know they hadn’t voted in elections recently and that they hadn’t yet voted.
I find it MOST interesting, that somehow Democrats believe this is Democracy!!! ROFLOL. This is NOT democracy, and the Republic is dead when people think it is. What happened isn’t ballot harvesting. It’s just plain voter fraud, concealed by Ballot Harvesting. That is the danger of Ballot Harvesting in that it conceals massive illegal voting.
The experts said it wasn’t real, the risk of voter fraud with ballot harvesting. I am thinking that probably all of those experts were democrats....
*** They had to have a list of voters, which you listed. Then they had to have REAL TIME feedback of whom had ALREADY voted. There was always a chance that people would vote ***
You could be right, of course, but I don’t think they worried much about those people actually showing up to vote. Some did, of course, but I think they just went with the probabilities with little chance of being caught and let them go to the Provisional ballots. Probably only about 10% of these people actually showed up to vote, and the Democrats knew that, plus they could check from one election to another what percentage of these people show up to vote after they’ve missed three straight.