Posted on 12/28/2021 9:08:46 AM PST by Red Badger
WASHINGTON — A Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has released a media sheet detailing the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Home Test Kit which is chalked full of contradictory statements but also stunning admissions.
Joe Biden announced last week that he, actually the American taxpayers, was purchasing 500 million at-home test kits at a cost of $3 billion. He also announced the use of military to be sent across the nation to administer COVID-19 “vaccines.”
Increased testing has coincided with case numbers rising then used for justification to keep the medical authoritarianism going.
The FDA media sheet admits the “solution in the tube contains a hazardous ingredient” which is sodium azide.
“If the solution contacts the skin or eye, flush with plenty of water. If irritation persists, seek medical advice,” the sheet states. It provides “potential risks” warnings of “possible discomfort during sample collection” and “possible incorrect test results.”
One warning not given is the potential risk of death. Sodium azide has been known to cause death as detailed in a 1990 government study titled “Death following accidental sodium azide ingestion.”
So, why would the FDA send a deadly drug to homes across America?
“One obvious reason is that these test kits are NOT approved by the FDA, but only given emergency use authorization (EUA), so the manufacturer is not responsible for any ‘accidents’ that might happen causing organ failure or death,” Brian Shilhavy wrote.
Shilhavy added: “In addition to the obvious problems that these tests cannot possibly be accurate since the Omicron variant is fake to begin with, and that if used wrongly they have lethal consequences, the other problem is that you need to scan a QR code that is then sent to a ‘telehealth proctor’ and now your private health information will no longer be private, but part of their database.”
The FDA admits these tests are only under EUA, and they can only be given as long as the declaration of a state of emergency, issued by Donald Trump in March of 2020 and remaining to this day under Biden, continues. That is also the case for the experimental jabs.
The sheet claims that these tests are 73-98.9% accurate, although admits they used a “relatively small sample size” to come up with that number. It also admits that the test “does not differentiate” between SARS viruses meaning the common cold can be flagged as a positive. That statement also invalidates any claims to accuracy.
“The performance of this test is still being studied in patients without signs and symptoms of respiratory infection and for serial screening. Performance may differ in these populations,” the sheet states.
And if you decide to trust your government and take a test, don’t be happy with a negative result because the sheet warns that “negative results may require additional testing to confirm your result.” Of course, false positives have been commonplace, but the sheet doesn’t warn of that.
The sheet states that you must be under “the supervision of a telehealth proctor,” one that the government trusts will report you if you come up positive. And if you test positive, it’s “likely that you may be placed in isolation to avoid spreading the virus to others.”
Suffice it to say, don’t take the test. It is a fraud and has been a fraud from the beginning.
As Jon Rappoport reported last year, the few PCR test samples that actually made it to labs proved they are useless. The “labs come up with different results” for the same tests.
Sodium azide is used in histology and has to be disposed of with other hazmat waste. This stuff poisons the environment.
Four per family limit?
And that's also how this all ends...eventually.
Cancel the state of emergency.
One man is all it takes.
I need not state the obvious.
“Isn’t warning a test contains sodium azide the same as warning that a battery contains sulphuric acid?”
I purchased a small metal mounting device. The box contained the standard California cancer warning.
“This is confusing. “
Not when you realize that writers add all the clickbait they can get away with.
Well that would have been nice to know before we brought a few of them into our home... Thankfully they are all gone now. But if we for any reason (can’t think of any at the moment) got them again I’ll be sure to caution wife about making sure the dog doesn’t get hold of it and chew on it or anything. Not that we’re careless, but with known hazardous substances you take extra precautions.
” They don’t mention the concentration, though.”
0.0125%
“which is chalked full”
It’s probably “chock full”, since chalk is not a hazardous substance as far as I know...
If you have an older car, your airbags contain NAN3
“...is chalked full”
Gack! Can’t read past that.
Sodium azide is the inorganic compound with the formula NaN3. This colorless salt is the gas-forming component in legacy[citation needed] car airbag systems. It is used for the preparation of other azide compounds. It is an ionic substance, is highly soluble in water and is very acutely poisonous.[5]
.
.
.
Sodium azide has caused deaths for decades,[16] and even minute amounts can cause symptoms. The toxicity of this compound is comparable to that of soluble alkali cyanides,[17] although no toxicity has been reported from spent airbags.[18]
It produces extrapyramidal symptoms with necrosis of the cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and basal ganglia. Toxicity may also include hypotension,[19] blindness and hepatic necrosis. Sodium azide increases cyclic GMP levels in brain and liver by activation of guanylate cyclase.[20]
Sodium azide solutions react with metallic ions to precipitate metal azides, which can be shock sensitive and explosive. This should be considered for choosing a non-metallic transport container for sodium azide solutions in the laboratory. This can also create potentially dangerous situations if azide solutions should be directly disposed down the drain into a sanitary sewer system. Metal in the plumbing system could react, forming highly sensitive metal azide crystals which could accumulate over years. Adequate precautions are necessary for the safe and environmentally responsible disposal of azide solution residues.[21]
Acute symptoms of copper poisoning by ingestion include vomiting, hematemesis (vomiting of blood), hypotension (low blood pressure), melena (black “tarry” feces), coma, jaundice (yellowish pigmentation of the skin), and gastrointestinal distress.[1] Individuals with glucose-6-phosphate deficiency may be at increased risk of hematologic effects of copper.[1] Hemolytic anemia resulting from the treatment of burns with copper compounds is infrequent.[1]
Chronic (long-term) copper exposure can damage the liver and kidneys.[2] Mammals have efficient mechanisms to regulate copper stores such that they are generally protected from excess dietary copper levels.[2][3]
Those same protection mechanisms can cause milder symptoms, which are often misdiagnosed as psychiatric disorders. There is a lot of research on the function of the Cu/Zn ratio in neurological, endocrinological, and psychological conditions.[4][5][6] Many of the substances that protect us from excess copper perform important functions in our neurological and endocrine systems, leading to diagnostic difficulties. When they are used to bind copper in the plasma, to prevent it from being absorbed in the tissues, their own function may go unfulfilled. Such symptoms often include mood swings, irritability, depression, fatigue, excitation, difficulty focusing, and feeling out of control. To further complicate diagnosis, some symptoms of excess copper are similar to those of a copper deficit.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) in drinking water is 1.3 milligrams per liter.[1][7] The MCL for copper is based on the expectation that a lifetime of consuming copper in water at this level is without adverse effect (gastrointestinal). The US EPA lists copper as a micronutrient and a toxin.[8] Toxicity in mammals includes a wide range of animals and effects such as liver cirrhosis, necrosis in kidneys and the brain, gastrointestinal distress, lesions, low blood pressure, and fetal mortality.[9][10][11] The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has set a limit of 0.1 mg/m3 for copper fumes (vapor generated from heating copper) and 1 mg/m3 for copper dusts (fine metallic copper particles) and mists (aerosol of soluble copper) in workroom air during an eight-hour work shift, 40-hour work week.[12] Toxicity to other species of plants and animals is noted to varying levels.[8]
But in California ...
So are we supposed to dip the swab into the solution and then stick it as far up our nostril as possible and swirl it around?
Hmmmm.
How many products under your kitchen or bathroom sink contain hazardous chemicals?
That 21% number sounds a lot like the NFL players positive Covid test percentage.
Bwahahahahahahaha!
“So are we supposed to dip the swab into the solution and then stick it as far up our nostril as possible and swirl it around?”
No.
“So are we supposed to dip the swab into the solution and then stick it as far up our nostril as possible and swirl it around?”
Why do you post this garbage. It makes no sense!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.