Posted on 09/30/2021 7:33:24 PM PDT by Westbrook
Excerpt from end of article...
In seeking additional documents from Sussmann’s former law firm, Perkins Coie, investigators from the special counsel’s office appear to be sharpening their focus on the Democratic political machinery during the 2016 campaign and efforts to tie Trump to Russia.
Perkins Coie’s clients in 2016 included the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.chttps: ...
I must be dreaming.
Ping.
search online for John Durham Perkins Coie. almost no FakeNewsMSM coverage. something I won’t click on from CNN and a Yahoo piece ditto. of course, it should have thousands of MSM articles with apologies for being complicit in the Trump/Russia hoax!
1 Oct: UK Daily Mail: Special prosecutor Durham subpoenas law firm with ties to the 2016 Clinton campaign in his Russia investigation in sign he could be expanding his criminal case
John Durham obtained a grand jury indictment Sept. 16 of Democratic cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann for making a false statement to the FBI
Sussmann, a lawyer at Perkins Coie, gave FBI data from researchers who thought numbers might be evidence of secrets between Trump and Russia
Durham issued additional subpoenas to Perkins Coie
Indictment alleges he failed to disclose his political ties during the meeting
Sussmann denied the accusations and claimed he arranged the meeting in Russia in 2016 to represent a cybersecurity expert Action comes two years after Durham began his probe into alleged FBI misconduct in the Russia probe
Durham probe ended up charging an FBI source, with a statute of limitations bearing down
Durham’s team suggested a theory that Clinton campaign used Perkins Coie to submit information to FBI about Russia and Trump to hurt his 2016 campaign
It resulted in sensational media reports before the election about the potential ties
The FBI concluded the researchers’ concerns had no merit and Sussmann’s lawyers are expecting their client to be indicted
Sussmann’s lawyers denied the charges, calling them ‘baseless’
By GEOFF EARLE, DEPUTY U.S. POLITICAL EDITOR
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10047383/Special-prosecutor-Durham-subpoenas-law-firm-ties-2016-Clinton-campaign.html
Hmmmm...something real is going down..
Why has it taken this long?
Is failed SCOTUS Justice Garland going to continue to fund this Witch [cough***Hitlery****cough] Hunt in the new fiscal year?
Ping.
Interesting.
it ain’t a TV show. It takes as long as it takes to get it right so it doesn’t get thrown out. Both sides have teams of attorneys.
Over a year too late.
A bow legged snail would be running circles around Durham.
What the hell took so long? This probably the biggest case of his career and of national interest. Geesh.
P
Thanks for the ping.
Isn’t there someone connected to Garland, related to this, somehow....that should recuse?
I never thought that i would see someone take-on the pack of bottom-feeders at Perkins-Coie.
Neither did I (think I’d see that).
I hope it’s not a head fake....but, that it’s truth that will begin the topple, of this monstrous cabal.
This is what what you get when you have lot’s of lawyers and lot’s of money going head to head.
Since the Clintons no longer have the political clout nor popularity they once had (hence, they are no longer politically useful), Hillery could well go down. Dems will sacrifice one of their own. Weiner, Spitzer, Blagojevich, and others come to mind.
“ Why has it taken this long?”
Why has it taken so long to build a legal case regarding perhaps the biggest criminal case ever? Is that what you’re asking?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.