Posted on 12/19/2020 6:39:58 PM PST by White Lives Matter
These past few weeks the dysfunction of the Supreme Court has come to a head. The Court, led by Chief John Roberts, has removed itself from getting involved in the 2020 election. Something’s not right.
The manner in which Chief Justice Roberts runs the Supreme Court is a travesty. It is corrupt. He doesn’t uphold the rule of law, he breaks it.
A week ago the Supreme Court threw out the Texas case which more than 20 states joined in support. This was the first case on the 2020 election based on its merits. It was shocking that the three new Trump judges would not vote to hear the case. This decision led legal legend Lin Wood to share the following tweet:
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
I'm confused.
In a murder trial, the court can't "fix it" by bringing back the dead.
In a theft trial, the court can't "fix it" by giving back the money.
In an arson trial, the court can't "fix it" by giving back the property.
But they still hold the trial.
This wasn't a case before the Supreme Court in an appellate form, it was original jurisdiction. They were the triers of fact in this case.
Like the stolen money or burned building, they know they can't "fix" the loss, but that doesn't absolve them of the accountability of hearing the case and finding guilt.
And the truth is that the "fix" is there in the Constitution and US Code. The only thing the "fixers" needed was the finding from the court on the facts.
That was the job of the court, to make a finding of fact. The "fix" was the responsibility of others.
-PJ
I ain’t clicking that sh!t!
LOL
btw, The Donald has competing info for those that want to check it that it is a different AIG...
https://thedonald.win/p/HXk4T0ae/scotus-justice-john-roberts-wasn/
but my info is correct as it pertains to SCOTUS arguments on 3/22/2010 and 3/23/2010
WHICH ANYONE CAN EASILY CHECK
Even Soros Cheered Roberts at Davos
Ae you familiar with “Birds of a feather”?
THe plane john roberts flew on IS NOT EPSTEIN’S PLANE
YOU PSYCHO
CHECK IT OUT WITH THE TAIL NUMBER
AND GET LOST
btw, I think this AIG owner makes more sense but not going to track it down as I am satisfied with the fact CJ Roberts was in oral arguments
and the plane is not Epsteins
https://thedonald.win/p/HXk4T0ae/scotus-justice-john-roberts-wasn/
I think you may have the wrong AIG.
See this
https://thedonald.win/p/HXk4T0ae/scotus-justice-john-roberts-wasn/
Murder, theft, arson- the court’s relief is at least punishment of the guilty.
If the court found the state Executive branch guilty of not following the state’s laws what could they do?
It’s up to those legislatures to act. And the state’s courts. Not the federal SC.
Yeah, we desperately need findings of facts, maybe that job was intentionally avoided by the SC... but note even Alito said “no relief”.
“I looked for a time on the flight log and didnt see anything..but didnt spend much time on the issue.”
You loon.
Here is an answer to your question:
https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/19508
As you can see, his ability to pick the justice to write opinions, to control who speaks during oral arguments and the other matters he controls, can make a justice a historical success or he can put them in a corner with a figurative dunce cap on their head never to be heard or seen in public.
OK, so that is an exaggeration to make a point. The point is he can make their career or make it no fun.
SO tell me PSYCHO STALKER,....what was the time of the actual flight?
Oh and PSYCHO STALKER...
read this link
https://thedonald.win/p/HXk4T0ae/scotus-justice-john-roberts-wasn/
After all if a court doesn’t deny a case- don’t they, necessarily, hear it?
Maybe it wouldn’t get to oral argument but ‘something’ happens. At least the two sides present their cases.
The left have something on him. That’s the only explanation for his being in their pockets since the Obamacare debacle.
Not really. I guess it depends on your definition
cases get filed...and then dismissed..
alito and thomas basically said it should be allowed to be filed but they would provide no other remedy
I do not know, but his behavior at the “press conference,” in Georgia a few weeks ago was telling. Sidney Powell was there too. Wood came off like a sleazy televangelist. It is funny that up until the last month or so, he probably had a good reputation, due to the Richard Jewell movie and his win in that case and the Covington case.
At the time, were Biden & Clinton “far left?” I would not have said so.
That depends on how narrow or broad the view is (I know SCOTUS prefers to narrow it as small as possible).
That said, if the case is "Governor X violated law 1.2.3..." that's one thing.
If the case is "State X conducted an illegal election..." then that's a different thing.
If the case is "State X conducted an illegal election via collusion between Governor X, Secretary Y, and Election Administrator Z to circumvent legislative law 1.2.3..." then that's even more of a different thing.
But SCOTUS didn't even want to hear what thing it was. They jumped right to not wanting to explore remedies, even though they know what remedies are laid out in US Code and the Constitution.
-PJ
Good points.
But, to my point, I believe the only “relief” the petitioners even asked for was for the state legislature to be directed to reconsider the vote tally. Which would be a “silly” ruling in the court’s mind. It would be like just ruling “don’t do that”.
I guess I’m not making myself clear...
“Finding of fact” is what we need from the courts. The SC could have stepped up here, but they didn’t have to. Lots of other courts can, and should, do that. Though most haven’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.