Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What’s Going on with Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts? Even Soros Cheered Roberts at Davos
GP ^ | December 19, 2020 | Joe Hoft

Posted on 12/19/2020 6:39:58 PM PST by White Lives Matter

These past few weeks the dysfunction of the Supreme Court has come to a head. The Court, led by Chief John Roberts, has removed itself from getting involved in the 2020 election. Something’s not right.

The manner in which Chief Justice Roberts runs the Supreme Court is a travesty. It is corrupt. He doesn’t uphold the rule of law, he breaks it.

A week ago the Supreme Court threw out the Texas case which more than 20 states joined in support. This was the first case on the 2020 election based on its merits. It was shocking that the three new Trump judges would not vote to hear the case. This decision led legal legend Lin Wood to share the following tweet:

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: benedictarnolds; compromised; epsteinisland; georgesoros; impropriety; joebiden; johnroberts; linwood; salientimpropriety; scotus; scotusimpropriety; seditiousimpropriety; treason; trump; usconstitution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: maggief

PSYCHO STALKER

Try to deny this in the future..

GET LOST
https://www.jetphotos.com/info/GULF-247


81 posted on 12/19/2020 7:49:24 PM PST by RummyChick (I BLAME KUSHNER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
That the states didn’t follow their legislatures’ laws on conducting elections was something the court could rule on- but what could they DO? Nothing. ( as Alito said). I don’t know the technical term, but courts don’t take cases they can’t provide relief for.

I'm confused.

In a murder trial, the court can't "fix it" by bringing back the dead.

In a theft trial, the court can't "fix it" by giving back the money.

In an arson trial, the court can't "fix it" by giving back the property.

But they still hold the trial.

This wasn't a case before the Supreme Court in an appellate form, it was original jurisdiction. They were the triers of fact in this case.

Like the stolen money or burned building, they know they can't "fix" the loss, but that doesn't absolve them of the accountability of hearing the case and finding guilt.

And the truth is that the "fix" is there in the Constitution and US Code. The only thing the "fixers" needed was the finding from the court on the facts.

That was the job of the court, to make a finding of fact. The "fix" was the responsibility of others.

-PJ

82 posted on 12/19/2020 7:49:41 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I ain’t clicking that sh!t!

LOL


83 posted on 12/19/2020 7:55:28 PM PST by maggief (PSYCHO STALKER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

btw, The Donald has competing info for those that want to check it that it is a different AIG...

https://thedonald.win/p/HXk4T0ae/scotus-justice-john-roberts-wasn/

but my info is correct as it pertains to SCOTUS arguments on 3/22/2010 and 3/23/2010

WHICH ANYONE CAN EASILY CHECK


84 posted on 12/19/2020 7:57:39 PM PST by RummyChick (I BLAME KUSHNER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: White Lives Matter

Even Soros Cheered Roberts at Davos

Ae you familiar with “Birds of a feather”?


85 posted on 12/19/2020 7:58:13 PM PST by saintgermaine (THE TIME TRAVELLER )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

THe plane john roberts flew on IS NOT EPSTEIN’S PLANE
YOU PSYCHO

CHECK IT OUT WITH THE TAIL NUMBER

AND GET LOST


86 posted on 12/19/2020 7:59:11 PM PST by RummyChick (I BLAME KUSHNER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: White Lives Matter

btw, I think this AIG owner makes more sense but not going to track it down as I am satisfied with the fact CJ Roberts was in oral arguments
and the plane is not Epsteins

https://thedonald.win/p/HXk4T0ae/scotus-justice-john-roberts-wasn/


87 posted on 12/19/2020 8:02:45 PM PST by RummyChick (I BLAME KUSHNER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick; Hot Tabasco

I think you may have the wrong AIG.

See this

https://thedonald.win/p/HXk4T0ae/scotus-justice-john-roberts-wasn/


88 posted on 12/19/2020 8:03:38 PM PST by RummyChick (I BLAME KUSHNER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Murder, theft, arson- the court’s relief is at least punishment of the guilty.

If the court found the state Executive branch guilty of not following the state’s laws what could they do?
It’s up to those legislatures to act. And the state’s courts. Not the federal SC.

Yeah, we desperately need findings of facts, maybe that job was intentionally avoided by the SC... but note even Alito said “no relief”.


89 posted on 12/19/2020 8:04:58 PM PST by mrsmith (US MEDIA: " Every 'White' cop is a criminal! And all the 'non-white' criminals saints!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

“I looked for a time on the flight log and didnt see anything..but didnt spend much time on the issue.”

You loon.


90 posted on 12/19/2020 8:08:01 PM PST by maggief (PSYCHO STALKER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: lgjhn23

Here is an answer to your question:
https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/19508

As you can see, his ability to pick the justice to write opinions, to control who speaks during oral arguments and the other matters he controls, can make a justice a historical success or he can put them in a corner with a figurative dunce cap on their head never to be heard or seen in public.

OK, so that is an exaggeration to make a point. The point is he can make their career or make it no fun.


91 posted on 12/19/2020 8:09:46 PM PST by old curmudgeon (There is no situation so terrible, so disgraceful, that the federal government can not make worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: maggief

SO tell me PSYCHO STALKER,....what was the time of the actual flight?


92 posted on 12/19/2020 8:10:52 PM PST by RummyChick (I BLAME KUSHNER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Oh and PSYCHO STALKER...
read this link

https://thedonald.win/p/HXk4T0ae/scotus-justice-john-roberts-wasn/


93 posted on 12/19/2020 8:12:59 PM PST by RummyChick (I BLAME KUSHNER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

After all if a court doesn’t deny a case- don’t they, necessarily, hear it?
Maybe it wouldn’t get to oral argument but ‘something’ happens. At least the two sides present their cases.


94 posted on 12/19/2020 8:13:40 PM PST by mrsmith (US MEDIA: " Every 'White' cop is a criminal! And all the 'non-white' criminals saints!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: White Lives Matter

The left have something on him. That’s the only explanation for his being in their pockets since the Obamacare debacle.


95 posted on 12/19/2020 8:16:26 PM PST by al_c (Democrats: Party over Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Not really. I guess it depends on your definition

cases get filed...and then dismissed..

alito and thomas basically said it should be allowed to be filed but they would provide no other remedy


96 posted on 12/19/2020 8:16:44 PM PST by RummyChick (I BLAME KUSHNER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

I do not know, but his behavior at the “press conference,” in Georgia a few weeks ago was telling. Sidney Powell was there too. Wood came off like a sleazy televangelist. It is funny that up until the last month or so, he probably had a good reputation, due to the Richard Jewell movie and his win in that case and the Covington case.


97 posted on 12/19/2020 8:29:20 PM PST by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

At the time, were Biden & Clinton “far left?” I would not have said so.


98 posted on 12/19/2020 8:31:18 PM PST by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
If the court found the state Executive branch guilty of not following the state’s laws what could they do?

That depends on how narrow or broad the view is (I know SCOTUS prefers to narrow it as small as possible).

That said, if the case is "Governor X violated law 1.2.3..." that's one thing.

If the case is "State X conducted an illegal election..." then that's a different thing.

If the case is "State X conducted an illegal election via collusion between Governor X, Secretary Y, and Election Administrator Z to circumvent legislative law 1.2.3..." then that's even more of a different thing.

But SCOTUS didn't even want to hear what thing it was. They jumped right to not wanting to explore remedies, even though they know what remedies are laid out in US Code and the Constitution.

-PJ

99 posted on 12/19/2020 8:31:29 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Good points.

But, to my point, I believe the only “relief” the petitioners even asked for was for the state legislature to be directed to reconsider the vote tally. Which would be a “silly” ruling in the court’s mind. It would be like just ruling “don’t do that”.
I guess I’m not making myself clear...

“Finding of fact” is what we need from the courts. The SC could have stepped up here, but they didn’t have to. Lots of other courts can, and should, do that. Though most haven’t.


100 posted on 12/19/2020 8:46:37 PM PST by mrsmith (US MEDIA: " Every 'White' cop is a criminal! And all the 'non-white' criminals saints!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson