Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What’s Going on with Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts? Even Soros Cheered Roberts at Davos
GP ^ | December 19, 2020 | Joe Hoft

Posted on 12/19/2020 6:39:58 PM PST by White Lives Matter

These past few weeks the dysfunction of the Supreme Court has come to a head. The Court, led by Chief John Roberts, has removed itself from getting involved in the 2020 election. Something’s not right.

The manner in which Chief Justice Roberts runs the Supreme Court is a travesty. It is corrupt. He doesn’t uphold the rule of law, he breaks it.

A week ago the Supreme Court threw out the Texas case which more than 20 states joined in support. This was the first case on the 2020 election based on its merits. It was shocking that the three new Trump judges would not vote to hear the case. This decision led legal legend Lin Wood to share the following tweet:

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: benedictarnolds; compromised; epsteinisland; georgesoros; impropriety; joebiden; johnroberts; linwood; salientimpropriety; scotus; scotusimpropriety; seditiousimpropriety; treason; trump; usconstitution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: mrsmith

Wrong, but he appreciates swampers giving him cover. The Constitution gives it to legislatures. But a state clearly violated that rule. Texas and 20 other states clearly had standing when Pennsylvania broke the mutual contract.
He might have ruled differently after a case, but its indefensible to say Texas and the others had no standing.

All states are parties to a contract. When Four members violate that contract, the remedy is clear. Other parties may sue to force compliance. Compliance could be as simple as the defendant state legislatures confirming that it was their process.

But Roberts is an amateur searching for a sophistry solution, just as he did in the Obamacare case. He is an advocate for the Bush wing, and a closet homo. He is not a dispassionate jurist.


61 posted on 12/19/2020 7:30:02 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The state legislatures are already required by the Constitution to fix it!
Also the Congress!
So the SC couldn’t do jack!
It’s already indisputable that the say on the elections is up to the legislatures.

With proof the state and fed legislatures will reject, without it they’ll accept the count.

Only the proof matters. Trump still has time to get that proof to them.
Wish evidentiary cases were further along in the courts. That produces “proof”.


62 posted on 12/19/2020 7:33:04 PM PST by mrsmith (US MEDIA: " Every 'White' cop is a criminal! And all the 'non-white' criminals saints!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

There you go again...

Why don’t you link ALL your research to support your claims?


63 posted on 12/19/2020 7:33:27 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Well I just made the cardinal sin.

I read the headline and no more.

Apparently Roberts was not a Davos. They cheered him in absentia.

Anyway, being cheered by Soros and that crawd is not exactly a badge of honor.

Sorry about my rant.

64 posted on 12/19/2020 7:33:57 PM PST by old curmudgeon (There is no situation so terrible, so disgraceful, that the federal government can not make worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Twice In 2008
Remember the secret second swearing
Supposedly a do- over for a technicality
No press, no witnesses, no explanation


65 posted on 12/19/2020 7:34:05 PM PST by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

Or why Dan Crenshaw was there at the World Economic forum in Davos. They are scrubbing pages as quickly as they can, but he is one of Claus Schwab’s “young leaders”.


66 posted on 12/19/2020 7:34:19 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: maggief

OR....you could just do the research yourself. WHy don’t you

https://prijet.com/


67 posted on 12/19/2020 7:37:01 PM PST by RummyChick (I BLAME KUSHNER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: lgjhn23

What could Judge Roberts ‘threaten’ the three new judges with that would convince them to deny the Texas case?


68 posted on 12/19/2020 7:37:29 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Oh and btw, I already LINKED TO YOU how to look at SCOTUS arguments. YOu can even listen to oral arguments throughout the years.

Why do you continue to pretend that I am lying about Oral Arguments on 3/22/2010 and 3/23/2010.


69 posted on 12/19/2020 7:38:37 PM PST by RummyChick (I BLAME KUSHNER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Actually I’m with Alito on this:
they should have heard the case, said that that it was unlawful for the states not to follow their laws, and said that there was nothing they could do.
Would have done the country good- even though it cost the court some prestige.


70 posted on 12/19/2020 7:39:33 PM PST by mrsmith (US MEDIA: " Every 'White' cop is a criminal! And all the 'non-white' criminals saints!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

States are in a contract together. It is called the constitution. Four violated the contract. The remedy cannot be, and is not for them to be left fix their own problems...if they please. That leaves open the predicable result that a violator will not do so. That failure violates the constitutional rights of the states that followed the constitution.
Twenty states agreed.

The Supreme court is the original jurisdiction when a state sues another state. They clearly had standing. Roberts is a closet butt pirate and did what he did because it fit’s his politics. Just like the Obamacare decision. Just like his free work for the homo cause in Colorado before he was a judge.


71 posted on 12/19/2020 7:39:44 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: White Lives Matter

If the Rats were in our position there would be thousands camped out on his lawn. Why aren’t we?


72 posted on 12/19/2020 7:41:13 PM PST by TonyM (Score Event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Actually, he didnt say they would allow oral arguments.

He indicated they should be allowed to file as SCOTUS has originial jurisdiction. This is consistent with a previous case which Red State had discovered prior to the ruling.


73 posted on 12/19/2020 7:42:10 PM PST by RummyChick (I BLAME KUSHNER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

You are such a fraud.

Go ahead ... let’s see all you research, with supporting links.


74 posted on 12/19/2020 7:42:33 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Twice in 2009 and twice in 2013, once public and once again in private, both times, hmmmmmm.


75 posted on 12/19/2020 7:43:57 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents|Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

“...What could Judge Roberts ‘threaten’ the three new judges with that would convince them to deny the Texas case?....”

Good question...dunno, but it would be nice to know.
Maybe a severe pounding around the head and shoulders?
IF all the screaming and hollering that took place is for real, maybe they’re scared spitless of him...maybe insane?
He made threats against the POTUS being preventing his reelection IF the phone conversation is true.
Sounds like the POS is a real nut case.


76 posted on 12/19/2020 7:44:36 PM PST by lgjhn23 (Libs are a virus.....the DemoVirus!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

My view is that the offered “standing” basis for rejection was sleight-of-hand to avoid the scenario of not providing relief.

I would think the three kooks didn’t want for the reason of protecting the Dem P{arty, and three others didn’t want it because it would bring disrepute on the court since couldn’t DO anything about it.


77 posted on 12/19/2020 7:45:36 PM PST by mrsmith (US MEDIA: " Every 'White' cop is a criminal! And all the 'non-white' criminals saints!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: maggief

You a nut job.

I gave you the link to the oral arguments on 3/22 and 3/23 of 2010

I have hand fed you a link were you can look at the ownership history of the tail number

Sheesh, you are psycho


78 posted on 12/19/2020 7:46:55 PM PST by RummyChick (I BLAME KUSHNER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

LMAO!

Drink up, girl.


79 posted on 12/19/2020 7:48:31 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

“The remedy cannot be, and is not for them to be left fix their own problems...if they please.”

There is also Congress.

I see a lot in the Constitution about legislatures and the Presidential elections.
Nothing about the Supreme, or any, Court though.


80 posted on 12/19/2020 7:49:22 PM PST by mrsmith (US MEDIA: " Every 'White' cop is a criminal! And all the 'non-white' criminals saints!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson