Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Roberts Caught On Video Admitting Why He Really Refused The Texas Election Fraud Case
Populist Press ^ | 12/17/2020

Posted on 12/17/2020 8:42:31 PM PST by SeekAndFind

The question is not whether Joe Biden won or lost, it’s what’s the cost if the left doesn’t get their way which is what too many cowards are truly afraid of. They will sacrifice the future of our republic just to “keep the peace.”

This video of court justices in Texas proves that. They fought loudly over whether to hear the Texas election fraud case out of fear the inevitable results would lead to leftist riots. Essentially, they are admitting Trump won by their outrage and fear of proving Biden is not the rightful victor.

SCOTUS.⚖️

"I don't give a #@&^ about 'Bush v. Gore'… at that time we didn't have RIOTS!"

A staffer "heard *SCREAMING* through the walls as Justice Roberts & other liberal Justices were insisting this case *NOT* be taken up…"

Wonder why Texas' case was dropped? Here's why: pic.twitter.com/rCpf5vwqSQ

— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) December 17, 2020

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE TWITTER VIDEO (ON C-SPAN)



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: applesauce; balderdash; codswallop; deludedandsad; drivel; electionfraud; fakenews; flapdoodle; johnroberts; justices; lyingheadline; moralcowardice; moreqqqqqqnonsense; nonsense; qtards; scotus; searchandfind
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Diabolical efforts expended upon, and ostesibly from, those who seek the truth.


21 posted on 12/17/2020 9:05:03 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew (I'd rather have a rude President than a polite tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I might find this more believable if the person who heard this said the justices were in a conference call near one of the justice’s office. I really don’t believe people like Breyer, Sotomayer, and Kagan would sit in a room with the 6 other justices and discuss this during a pandemic.


22 posted on 12/17/2020 9:07:56 PM PST by convoter2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Midwesterner53

Works for me.


23 posted on 12/17/2020 9:08:01 PM PST by GreyHoundSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

“Here’s a believable reason”

John Wayne and Ronald Reagan wouldn’t agree. [Well, John Wayne certainly....].


24 posted on 12/17/2020 9:12:10 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

l8r


25 posted on 12/17/2020 9:12:56 PM PST by preacher ( Journalism no longer reports news, they use news to shape our society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Roberts doesn't like the way Trump does things....especially when he criticizes 'His' court.....which he has done.
26 posted on 12/17/2020 9:12:58 PM PST by caww ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Clickbait. There is no video of Justice Roberts or any other Justice in the video.

This post isn’t even 4chan worthy.


27 posted on 12/17/2020 9:12:58 PM PST by thegagline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This is the third story I have seen claiming a "video." It's BS. There is no video. It's all hearsay and originated on Hal Turner's radio program. Stop posting this crap.

BTW, it probably did happen... but no one can prove it, so what's the point? And claiming there is a video when there is not is just... fake news.

28 posted on 12/17/2020 9:14:15 PM PST by ponygirl (An Appeal to Heaven )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Interesting analogy. John Wayne backed Gerald Ford over Reagan in 1976 and Reagan never forgave him.


29 posted on 12/17/2020 9:14:39 PM PST by Luke21 (Elections you say? We get them next election? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ponygirl

The rumor echo chamber going on is annoying as F.

It’s a purposeful distraction from the real substance.


30 posted on 12/17/2020 9:15:22 PM PST by Professional ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Good point. I’m thinking that most of them are owned by Chyna and are literally in fear for their lives. The CCP is not as civilized as we are, nor are they as competent. I suspect that another 4 years without funding from the American taxpayers, they will go under.

However, if they make us into Chyna, the whole world will collapse.


31 posted on 12/17/2020 9:15:24 PM PST by gspurlock (http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ponygirl

RE: Stop posting this crap.
BTW, it probably did happen...

_____________________

The two statements are mutually exclusive.

If it probably happened then it can’t be crap.


32 posted on 12/17/2020 9:16:14 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The article is crap. It’s got a misleading headline indicating there is video of Roberts going off on the other justices. There is no video, therefore > crap.


33 posted on 12/17/2020 9:19:25 PM PST by ponygirl (An Appeal to Heaven )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He needs to recuse himself.


34 posted on 12/17/2020 9:19:49 PM PST by bray (Pray for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So the argument against this being true seems to be that the justices have been working remotely for several months meeting virtually only. Someone on twatter posted a link to the press releases as proof of that, but the court does remain open for official business, but is closed to the public. Another poster stated that this was actually a live meeting held at the court because the justices did not trust that the feed for a virtual meeting was secure.

Is there any proof one way or another regarding the meeting format where this loud argument/debate took place where these things were supposedly said? Were all of the justices actually on site at the USSC in a conference room?


35 posted on 12/17/2020 9:20:32 PM PST by jurroppi1 (The Left doesn't have ideas, it has cliches. H/T Flick Lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think he is more afraid of the violence that will come against him from CCP than he is of violence in the streets.


36 posted on 12/17/2020 9:24:44 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
A bit misleading.

It's beyond "misleading", it's a lie. "populist press" and a bunch of other brand spankin' new blogs are just a mirror image of far left blogs that spout lies.

37 posted on 12/17/2020 9:24:58 PM PST by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Although i am not happy they didn’t take this case i almost feel like they may be right. Imagine if they had taken it. All future elections would then be turned over to the courts to decide. The SC doesn’t want that role and shouldn’t want that role.

With all the fraud we all know about, none of us are happy with this decision. Unfortunately I think we are screwed unless DJT decides to declare martial law and demands a new elections with in person voting with ID required. Highly unlikely.


38 posted on 12/17/2020 9:27:31 PM PST by freedomlver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The headline is fake.


39 posted on 12/17/2020 9:28:13 PM PST by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomlver

RE: All future elections would then be turned over to the courts to decide.

The Texas case DOES NOT ASK the SCOTUS to decide who the winner is.

What Texas and the 21 other states that joined the lawsuit seeks is for the Supreme Court to mandate that the defendant states comply with the Constitution, and that means that electors are selected by the states’ legislatures.

Texas makes this point clear, stressing: “Plaintiff State does not ask this Court to decide who won the election; they only ask that the Court enjoin the clear violations of the Electors Clause of the Constitution.”


40 posted on 12/17/2020 9:37:07 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson