Posted on 11/17/2020 7:25:27 AM PST by SeekAndFind
No doubt the election was stolen. No doubt there is more than enough evidence. No doubt the deepstate judges will discount the evidence. The Left is probably focussing on the SC justices who will likely vote in Trump’s favor. God knows what evil tactics they’re employing.
We control more state delegations in the House than the
Dems - 26 and possibly more depending upon the remaining contested seats. The problem is, one of the 26 is Wyoming where Liz Cheney is the vote, and she is pretty swampy. I would feel a lot better having 27 or 28 just to be safe.
It’s always Hoftday and never Christmas
You may well be right. When there are tough decisions to be made people usually start looking for ways to pass off the risk and responsibility to someone else.
That’s how many of those people got to their positions in the first place. They know how to bob and weave.
You can be sure that Kagan, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Roberts are votes to install Biden. That’s a lock. The question is whether they can peel off Kavanaugh or Gorsuch, they only need one and Trump is done. My bet is yes, they can and will.
But Biden’s threat to pack the Court would seem to weigh on the minds of some of the justices right about now.
That is an excellent observation.
“It’s always Holiday and never Christmas”
Our domestic enemies call Jerusalem “al qudz”.
False hope
Concentrate on actual Constitutional Law.
State law requires this.
You did that.
Your Supreme COurt said this
Case law says that.
Etc.
The courts would have to see that the votes were tainted enough to change the results, and that is born out by the fact that the swing states stopped counting ballots for no legitimate reason.
Boy you, me and a lot more on this board and around the country
> Nobody knows what they will do. But Biden’s threat to pack the Court would seem to weigh on the minds of some of the justices right about now.
One thing Roberts at least does seem to care about is protecting the institution of the Supreme Court. Hopefully he takes the left's vote packing threats seriously.
Not to mention letting obvious fraud stand would destroy the court's legitimacy in the eyes of half the country.
A club is not so exclusive and prestigious if there are 20 members compared to 9 :)
I hope they are thinking about that too.
And I hope Alito is still mad that they didn’t listen to the SC order in philly the first time around
we control more state houses than the Dems.”
problem is, “we” would be Republican elected officials....
“If that happens..my understanding is we win...we control more state houses than the Dems.”
This entire election fiasco ultimately comes down to our side underestimating the resolve and sheer evil of our opponents. While I believe that the Supreme Court would have to agree with all of the Trump teams points on the merits, I doubt they would be willing to take any action that could be viewed as “overturning an election”.
If the election is thrown to the House Trump will win if he indeed has the support of the Republican party behind him. Of course if Trump really had the Republican party behind him this all could have been settled on November 4th. We need to let all of our elected representatives know that they damn well better support him, because there are already violent threats being made against legislators from the other side.
Marching in the streets of DC is great, but there need to be marches in front of every state house and in the offices of every single state legislator and House representative.
Battle of the headlines...?
In reality...no one knows
If Barr would send a letter to each Governor saying, we have the evidence and will be filling charges once the votes have been certified.
You’d see some amazing media coverage of governors spearheading their own statewide fraud investigation. They would start hiding the evidence by elemenating the fraudulent votes. Or they would simply toss the hot potato into the hands of good controlled state legislators.
I see this in the work place all the time. Boss comes out and says we have a problem and declares the head will roll. After that, those with most guilt start finding ways to be the ones who found the causes and solutions without being able to find the culprits.
Seriously, if they have any real evidence, the only why to avoid criminal charges would be to fix the results before certification and eliminate any claim of being harmed by the fraud.
If Trump claims voter fraud in Pennsylvania harmed him, that claim loses credibility If actual is declared the winner in Pennsylvania.
problem is, “we” would be Republican elected officials....
Yup. The nutless wonders would rather get cucked than risk being disliked the very people who already don't like them, and never will.
If Gateway Pundit is right about this, I will take back all the bad things I said about them regarding the countless times they’ve been wrong.
Not to mention letting obvious fraud stand would destroy the court’s legitimacy in the eyes of half the country.
************
Right, it would be tantamount to the Court condoning a lack of transparency in the republic. Devastating position that would completely de-legitimize the Court IMO.
But it IS a very political body so who knows?
No, they won’t.
We ain’t voting our way out of this, folks.
Best be ready.
L
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.