The Courts Will Likely Overturn the Election Results In Numerous Jurisdictions Due to Voter Fraud – In the Data Is Where the Amount of Election Fraud Can Be Quantified and Estimated

I have no idea what kind of and how much evidence the SCOTUS needs to see to start overturning votes.

I wish I had a clue.

My guess is the best we can get from SCOTUS is a declaration that the vote tallies are hopelessly tainted and that this should be determined in the House.

I just need a bit ... just a bit ... of solid good election news if only for moral and hope sake.

Or yes votes were tainted but not enough to change result.

Voter fraud occurred across the board in the 2020 election and in every functional area. But in the data is where we’re able to locate and quantify or estimate much of the amount of election fraud which occurred in the 2020 election.

The 2020 election steal occurred in all areas. Before the election votes were mass-mailed and many of these votes we now are finding were illegitimate (i.e. dead people voting, etc…). Many other illegitimate votes came in after the election as those involved in the theft hurried to get enough votes counted to steal the election. Then the vote counting process was manipulated and against the law as Republican vote counting observers were not allowed to observe the process. The courts will and should overturn the results of the election connected to this voter fraud.

But ultimately we can quantify the steal in the data reported from the system. All the corruption in the election with ballots and the process surrounding that are a distraction per one former Law Enforcement Officer on Twitter:

These corrupt voter fraud activities should be investigated and the criminals involved be held accountable for their voter fraud actions. In addition, the election fraud most likely can be found in the system because we know that the voting machines are not ‘air-gapped’ but are connected to the Internet:

The tabulation systems are not air-gapped and this is where the major fraud occurred:

The election steal took place in the system and on November 7th some people already suspected this was being managed overseas in Spain and Germany:

In the data is where the the steal may best be identified. The voter fraud and millions of cases of voter abuse and vote counting abuse are very important and likely disqualify the results of the election. But another key to the steal was in the data.
We have already identified some patterns of abuse and blocks of votes that were illegal. There’s more to come.

Roscoe B Davis is on the case and on target.

RE: Roscoe B Davis is on the case and on target.

I am not familiar with the man. Do you know who he is and what his reputation is?

Im just worried that when recognizing that the members of the SCOTUS are not data scientist themselves, how their ability to understand this will be, and be confident eough in their understanding to rule appropriately...let alone explaining the data component of the fraud to the American people.

and that this should be determined in ~~the House.~~ each State Legislature.

Just let it come out soon and get concrete evidence to a judge or the Supreme Court.

Nobody knows what they will do. But Biden’s threat to pack the Court would seem to weigh on the minds of some of the justices right about now.

The tabulation systems are not air-gapped and this is where the major fraud occurred:

They are the exact opposite of air-gapped, from what I'm reading. Data is sent off internationally to servers to be tabulated... Scytl in Spain, somewhere in Germany... a great opportunity for fraud to occur downstream of the vote.

That's not to say that the Dems haven't been active upstream (nursing homes, double voting, fake registrations), or at the polls (mis-counting, fake ballot stuffing). But the biggest adjustments, in the middle of the night, seem to have mostly come from the tabulations, which I have labeled here as "downstream."

I think SCOTUS will essentially punt and the state legislatures will largely punt, they would rather this hot potato end up in the House.

If that happens..my understanding is we win...we control more state houses than the Dems.

Am I wrong?

>> that this should be determined in the House

I think this is a likely solution. We already know that, historically, SCOTUS often chooses to "punt" on subjects that are considered controversial. (Even though massive vote fraud, on a national level, shouldn't be controversial to anyone.) The House solution is an easy punt for them, because it's already established in the Constitution. And fortunately, the votes in this case align in favor of the GOP.

That’s is a GREAT point that I hadn’t even considered.

There’s more to come.

There always is.

I don’t think the justices are troubled by trying to understand the data. They will latch onto some summary numbers and can justify their votes with legal mumbo jumbo. Their rulings will come down on party lines. Its a very political body.