I have no idea what kind of and how much evidence the SCOTUS needs to see to start overturning votes.
I wish I had a clue.
My guess is the best we can get from SCOTUS is a declaration that the vote tallies are hopelessly tainted and that this should be determined in the House.
I just need a bit ... just a bit ... of solid good election news if only for moral and hope sake.
Nobody knows what they will do. But Biden’s threat to pack the Court would seem to weigh on the minds of some of the justices right about now.
You can be sure that Kagan, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Roberts are votes to install Biden. That’s a lock. The question is whether they can peel off Kavanaugh or Gorsuch, they only need one and Trump is done. My bet is yes, they can and will.
If Barr would send a letter to each Governor saying, we have the evidence and will be filling charges once the votes have been certified.
You’d see some amazing media coverage of governors spearheading their own statewide fraud investigation. They would start hiding the evidence by elemenating the fraudulent votes. Or they would simply toss the hot potato into the hands of good controlled state legislators.
I see this in the work place all the time. Boss comes out and says we have a problem and declares the head will roll. After that, those with most guilt start finding ways to be the ones who found the causes and solutions without being able to find the culprits.
Seriously, if they have any real evidence, the only why to avoid criminal charges would be to fix the results before certification and eliminate any claim of being harmed by the fraud.
If Trump claims voter fraud in Pennsylvania harmed him, that claim loses credibility If actual is declared the winner in Pennsylvania.
I have no idea what kind of and how much evidence the SCOTUS needs to see to start overturning votes