Posted on 11/07/2020 4:30:01 PM PST by grundle
I watched this entire 67 minute video by Dilbert creator Scott Adams. I really enjoyed it.
He said that for any individual accusation of voter fraud, there’s a 95% chance that the accusation is false.
Then he says there is a 100% chance that voter fraud is real.
He said that using dead people wouldn’t get enough votes to flip an election, and would be too easy to detect.
He said the stories of vans full of fake ballots coming in the middle of the night are also fake for the same reason.
He then says that the only possible way to rig an election without getting caught would be to rig the voting software.
He says that there is a 100% chance that this will eventually happen, either by the highest ranking one or two employees at the software company (via either bribery or blackmail) or by hacking from the outside, such as by a foreign government, or a political opponent.
He also points out that the companies that write this software refuse to let the public see their code, as it is considered a trade secret.
He also points out that today’s computer software is so complex that there is only one or, at most, two people at any given software company who fully understand how the entire software package works, and that bribery or blackmail of these one or two people could be enough to swing an election. He also said that if the election was rigged, it will eventually be exposed by the data (including, but not limited, to Benford’s Law), and that the math experts have already begun their examination.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpV52HeKLHU
Scott isnt as smart as he thinks he is.
Software it is. If you’ve looked here at FR even a little bit in the last two days, than you know all about Dominion software.
1- RATs saw how many votes they needed
2 - Stopped counting for the night
3 - In the case of MI, PA pulled thousands of ballots out of the closet
4 - Ensured no observers allow in to challenge signatures or secure envelopes
5- Mixed all bogus votes with valid votes
Dittos. Adams would be a whole lot smarter if he read Free Republic
The points he is making is old news to me. I’ve already read this here at FR.
“He said the stories of vans full of fake ballots coming in the middle of the night are also fake for the same reason.”
It’s on video. What’s fake about it?
Now would be a great time for a real Blockbuster
I’m wondering ...if they used the Dominion software they shd have had the votes??? If not using Dominion they had to manufacture votes???
My guess is that all of these things are real. Dead people voting (Joe Frazier, etc.) and vans with mysterious ballots, and lots of other stuff. But I bet the numbers are (intentionally) small.
Let’s say the difference in votes between 2 candidates is 100,000. And you can find 5000 dead people, and 10 boxes of 1000 ballots, and maybe something else. Okay. Maybe you can prove 20,000 fraudulent ballots. So (I guess) 1 candidate won by 80,000 votes. No big deal. If you go looking for fraud, you will find fraud, and you will be told that the fraud was insignificant — made no difference — so you should leave it alone.
Meanwhile, there is software which manufactured 1.5 million votes. But you’re supposed to be looking for dead people voting. You’re supposed to feel satisfied that you found 20,000 fraudulent votes. You’re supposed to totally miss the 1.5 million votes that made a difference.
PA, WI, MI etc broke the law when they did not allow republican poll watchers to observe ballots being opened and authenticated.
How can any election be legal when laws are broken?
Do a forensic on ballots to see if these came from China like the id cards that came from there
“today’s computer software is so complex that there is only one or, at most, two people at any given software company who fully understand how the entire software package works”
Nonsense! This is a machine that only has to read a couple of dozen marks on a ballot and then add the new marks to the previous totals one at a time. A lot of high school kids could do it.
Fraud occurred way before electronic data, Scott. It occurs in many forms. Read some history. Voting across state lines- eg the Kansas: Missouri border wars., Dead votes/ paid votes/ throwing away votes/ harvested votes/ out of state votes:/ changed votes and a bit of extra ballot stuffing. I’m sure there are infinite other options. Electronic vote fraud can accomplish more with a lot less legwork and a lot more precision, however.
He justsays this crap like its supposedly gospel
“today’s computer software is so complex that there is only one or, at most, two people at any given software company who fully understand how the entire software package works,”
That’s total B.S. Ive been writing software for over 40 years. Tallying votes from a scanner or hole-punch reader is Software 101. There is absolutely nothing complex about it.
Scott apparently knows nothing whatsoever about programming.
Meanwhile, the notion about the source code being a trade secret is B.S., too. From my own experience, if an entity contracts a programmer to write some software, it is usually the case that the resulting software belongs to the paying entity. This should certainly be the case, and be required when a government contracts software to count votes in an election. This is because the governing body *must* know exactly how the votes are being counted.
Scott seems pretty smart to me.
This guy is wrong on several different points.
Scott really thinks very highly of himself in every field
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.