Works for me.
So it works for me.
She will be a superb justice and be a fine achievement on the long list of President Trumps historical 12 year presidency.😬👍🇺🇸
I think it to be more of a consensus than a rumor.
Also, the left can't walk and chew gum at the same time, don't think there is enough time to mount a significant challenge.
Does anyone know what their records are like?
The “front runner” rarely gets these things. So Barrett being the pick would surprise me.
The woman from FL scares me. Thin resume and looks a climber to me. I really hope we don’t get another nasty surprise that turns into another “wise latina”.
In case anyone thinks Amy will have an easier time than Kavanaugh because she’s a woman and a mother, I found this Daily Mail hit piece which lays out the commie angle they will play:
“Trump’s Supreme Court frontrunners: A mother of seven who adopted two children from Haiti and belongs to a Christian sect that inspired The Handmaid’s Tale”
I predict there’ll be a battalion of crazy Handmaid protestors besieging her home with bullhorns if she’s the nominee.
“Controversial”?! Sure. To an America hating democrat. Otherwise what could be a better response than, perfect?
Nothing surprising here, she’s been at the top of the list for a long time.. with the scuttlebutt being the reason Kavanaugh was nominated over her was to keep her in reserve for when Trump replaces a female Judge.
Now I have no inside knowledge to back that up, but that has been rumored publicly for a while.
I don’t know why people want her, because she said she’s pro life? Joe is too, in his private life. So is Nancy the Catholics, in her private life. Haven’t heard an actual philosophy based reason to pick her. She’s a woman and made Feinstein upset. That seems to be her only attractive qualities. Also, she adopted from Haiti. Was every I dotted and every T crossed? What is she willing to do to make sure that any mistakes or wrong doings in that process don’t come out?
In a perfect world yes, but we have a political war to win.
A conservative of course. First in line a black women, second a Hispanic women and third a Caucasian women.
Welcome aboard. Your first post a vanity article but at least
you did well IMO by providing a lot of data. Have a good day.
She’s a good choice for a Ginsburg replacement. Has an actual record of taking right-leaning positions unlike some of the other names in the rumor mill. Of course, nothing is a guarantee, but my take is that the Supreme Court is too important to place one’s hopes on an enigma. Those have a tendency of going really bad for us after awhile. You get a year or two of very solid conservatives votes out of them as they adjust to their new role before they swing to the Left.
Anyone that President Trump nominates will be excellent.
I don’t see why it HAS to be a woman. Such thinking, disqualifying men, is no different than Biden’s thinking - a gender-centric discrimination.
I would like to see an Evangelical Christian be appointed. We are, and have been for a very long time, Catholic-heavy on this court (5 currently.) That is one reason it has swung so inexorably to the left. Two others are Jews (not including Ginsberg). The one non-catholic Protestant still has a strong Catholic background. How is that “balanced?”
It is customary to donate $10 to freerepublic when posting a vanity. Do so please.
Real good choice. Mentor and boss was Anthony Scalia. Identifies as Constitutionalist. Because of time constrates a woman would be best shot, if he picked a man, women would be coming out of woodwork claiming sexual harassment. Has 7 children, which include 2 from Haiti, and one with special needs.