Posted on 07/30/2020 10:33:16 AM PDT by Red Badger
Yes it turned out ok for them in the end because they live in a law abiding state. If this didn't go public the local DA would've attempted to destroy them.
“IF this didn’t get public attention they would have major legal issues. Laws shouldn’t be weighed by public opinion.”
I agree - but the problem isn’t the law here, it is a Soros-driven prosecutor who figured she had nothing to lose and everything to gain by taking on some Deplorables.
That’s why elections have consequences.
Soros told her to back off.
You can thank me later for straightening you out...
Naaa, they are too desperate to care.....
He may know, he just supports Obama's spying 100%.
Apparently, the laws of Missouri don’t mean anything anymore.
If they did this couple never would have been indicted.
Strike one on Mr.SOROS ??
They can still sue the DA for false arrest, denial of civil rights, etc,
I’ve read that they are long time Republicans.
Yeah - That's the latest little theory going around on the liberal sites (like Quora and Reddit) highly populated by over-educated liberal “authorities”: The rioters (er, peaceful protesters) were standing on HOA ground, not “private property” and so the rioters (er, pieces of protesters) were on “community ground” and so could be rioting and threatening all they want.
Problem with that theory:
The couple literally, legally, owned at least part of that “HOA property” outright.
Under state squatter’s right law, open and hostile (legal term) use of property for sufficient time (7 years?) renders the lot’s title to the squatters. The couple likely paid property taxes, mowed it, excluded public use at times, etc for enough years, and has been in court asserting their right to the parcel. Court has not decided yet, but being lawyers they wouldn’t be there if case wasn’t solid; I assume ownership begins when criteria are fulfilled, not when court signs title (else prior owner would react to court filing by evicting squatters and declaring “see they’re not squatting any more so it’s not theirs”).
Continuing prosecution for the incident would have
- claimed “castle doctrine” as armed & threatening trespassers on couple’s property
- parcel claimed as theirs per squatter’s right
- stalled title case dragged in for compelled ruling
- evidence tampering noted
- couple wins title
- retroactive ownership means mob violently trespassed
- castle doctrine law applies in plain wording, couple wins
- prosecutor charged with evidence tampering
- prosecutor loses
- mob subject to prosecution
- couple presses charges on mob
- dozens of criminal cases arise
- drawn out cases vs BLM et al
- couple sites for assorted damages
Upshot: couple wins core case, couple wins property title case, prosecutor incarcerated, city spends much on mob prosecution, jurisdictions cross political allies, couple gets windfall $.
Easier to drop the case.
Praise the Lord (and pass the ammunition).
Here is what movement shows for the Mrs. As of 30 July:
Description: Unlawful Use Of Weapon - Subsection 4 - Exhibiting { Felony E RSMo: 571.030 }
Date: 06/28/2020 Code: 571.030-010Y201752
7/30/2020 Answers to Disclosure Filed
States Voluntary Disclosure; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: CHRISTOPHER WALTER HINCKLEY
07/29/2020 Motion to Disqualify
DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THE CIRCUIT ATTORNEY AND THE CIRCUIT ATTORNEYS OFFICE; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: JOEL J SCHWARTZ
On Behalf Of: PATRICIA MCCLOSKEY
07/24/2020 Motion to Strike
Motion to Strike Amicus Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: KIMBERLY M GARDNER
07/21/2020 Entry of Appearance Filed
Entry of Appearance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: JOEL J SCHWARTZ
07/20/2020 Criminal Summons Issued
Document ID: 20-CRSU-2102, for MCCLOSKEY, PATRICIA;
Memorandum Filed
Amicus Brief of Attorney General Schmitt Supporting Dismissal; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: DEAN JOHN SAUER
Judge/Clerk - Note
UPON ARRAIGNMENT THIS CASE IS DENOMINATED TO CIRCUIT JUDGE MICHAEL STELZER DIV 6
Return Scheduled
Scheduled For: 08/31/2020; 9:00 AM ; CRAIG KENNEDY HIGGINS; Carnahan Courthouse
Probable Cause Statement Filed
Filed By: CHRISTOPHER WALTER HINCKLEY
Complaint Filed
Filed By: CHRISTOPHER WALTER HINCKLEY
Judge Assigned
Judge Assigned
“Movement”= MO case net. Silly cell phone and auto stopped.
Same appears for Mark McCloskey. Different judges, next hearing 31 Aug.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.