Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization Disappoints, Fails to Protect Women
Concerned Women for America ^ | April 6, 2019 | CWALAC Staff

Posted on 04/06/2019 11:09:58 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This week, the House passed a reauthorization bill of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), but this bill falls short and fails to accomplish its namesake goal. From its inception, the purpose of VAWA has been to protect, support, and seek justice for women who have suffered assault or abuse. CWALAC fully supports that mission. The goal of the current VAWA reauthorization efforts should advance these objectives, not compromise them. The reauthorization must address misguided efforts to go beyond the scope of VAWA, which represent a fundamental threat to the privacy and safety of women and girls. Unfortunately, the House-passed version of VAWA ignores and even exacerbates the current problems with the VAWA law.

The Violence Against Women Act, as it stands, has set up a direct threat to women. Females are forced to share shelters and showers with biological men who “identify” as women. This is not hypothetical; transgender access is threatening women. Look at the case of Poverello House in Fresno, California, where nine women were sexually harassed and forced to shower with the transgender who aggressively and regularly harassed them. Shelter staff said they could do nothing, because their women’s shelter received federal grants.

Provisions in the 2013 reauthorization set up this problem, and many members of Congress voted against that bill, and CWA opposed the bill because of it. House Democrats have rejected this reality and are turning their backs on women’s rights. The privacy and safety of women and girls should not be compromised in a bill whose purpose is to protect female victims of violence.

(Excerpt) Read more at concernedwomen.org ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: communism; cwalac; democrats; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; ideology; institutions; lgbt; longmarch; marxism; mediawingofthednc; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; safety; smearmachine; socialism; transgender; vawa

1 posted on 04/06/2019 11:09:58 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 100American; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ...

CWALAC = Concerned Women for America’s Legislative Action Committee

PING!


2 posted on 04/06/2019 11:10:37 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Modern feminism: ALL MEN BAD!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

We don’t need no stinkin WAWA or whatever the hell it’s called. You’d think we are Iran or Saudi Arabia.


3 posted on 04/06/2019 11:24:37 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


4 posted on 04/06/2019 11:30:35 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

It’s astonishing to me that Justice Kennedy couldn’t foresee problems like this.


5 posted on 04/06/2019 11:39:28 AM PDT by libertylover (Democrats hated Lincoln too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Veto, Veto, And then Veto some more.


6 posted on 04/06/2019 12:07:51 PM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Hah! Fooled again...

"This week, the House passed a reauthorization bill of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), but this bill falls short and fails to accomplish its namesake goal."

The NAME of the bill hardly ever represents what's IN the bill. As an example. I give you... The Affordable Care Act.

7 posted on 04/06/2019 12:11:58 PM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

WAWA: The protect cheap gas stations from foreign competition act.


8 posted on 04/06/2019 12:20:56 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Modern feminism: ALL MEN BAD!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: libertylover
The sad mental image I've sometimes had of Justice Kennedy since his majority opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges is one in which he's standing while wearing no bottoms (his bare ass is hanging out). I wonder if he's a closeted gay or bi, even though Jesus commands me not to judge what's in a person's heart, since only He and God could know that.
9 posted on 04/06/2019 12:23:45 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Modern feminism: ALL MEN BAD!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

They dont need special protection, the law protects all.

The govt and law care zero about men suffering violence and have nothing for them.


10 posted on 04/06/2019 1:49:57 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The Second Amendment protects women.


11 posted on 04/06/2019 2:09:22 PM PDT by jmacusa ("The more numerous the laws the more corrupt the government''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All



Hate to ask and don't want to be pushy,
but could y'all please really try to
Make Your Donation


12 posted on 04/06/2019 3:07:40 PM PDT by onyx (Join 300 CLUB BY DONATING $34 MONTHLY! TRUMP'S WAY IS THE WINNING WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson