Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Federal Reserve is PRIVATELY OWNED
Facts are Facts ^

Posted on 12/30/2018 10:11:53 AM PST by MNDude

Dear American: Pursuant to your request, I will attempt to clear up questions you have about the Federal Reserve Bank (FED). I spent much time researching the FED and these are the shocking and revealing conclusions.

Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution states that Congress shall have the power to coin (create) money and regulate the value thereof. Today however, the FED, which is a privately owned company, controls and profits by printing money through the Treasury, and regulating its value. The FED began with approximately 300 people or banks that became owners (stockholders purchasing stock at $100 per share - the stock is not publicly traded) in the Federal Reserve Banking System. They make up an international banking cartel of wealth beyond comparison (Reference 1, 14). The FED banking system collects billions of dollars (Reference 8, 17) in interest annually and distributes the profits to its shareholders. The Congress illegally gave the FED the right to print money (through the Treasury) at no interest to the FED. The FED creates money from nothing, and loans it back to us through banks, and charges interest on our currency. The FED also buys Government debt with money printed on a printing press and charges U.S. taxpayers interest. Many Congressmen and Presidents say this is fraud (Reference 1,2,3,5,17).

Who actually owns the Federal Reserve Central Banks? The ownership of the 12 Central banks, a very well kept secret, has been revealed:

Rothschild Bank of London Warburg Bank of Hamburg Rothschild Bank of Berlin Lehman Brothers of New York Lazard Brothers of Paris Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy Goldman, Sachs of New York Warburg Bank of Amsterdam Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (Reference 14, P. 13, Reference 12, P. 152)

These bankers are connected to London Banking Houses which ultimately control the FED. When England lost the Revolutionary War with America (our forefathers were fighting their own government), they planned to control us by controlling our banking system, the printing of our money, and our debt (Reference 4, 22).

The individuals listed below owned banks which in turn owned shares in the FED. The banks listed below have significant control over the New York FED District, which controls the other 11 FED Districts. These banks also are partly foreign owned and control the New York FED District Bank. (Reference 22)

First National Bank of New York James Stillman National City Bank, New York Mary W. Harnman National Bank of Commerce, New York A.D. Jiullard Hanover National Bank, New York Jacob Schiff Chase National Bank, New York Thomas F. Ryan Paul Warburg William Rockefeller Levi P. Morton M.T. Pyne George F. Baker Percy Pyne Mrs. G.F. St. George J.W. Sterling Katherine St. George H.P. Davidson J.P. Morgan (Equitable Life/Mutual Life) Edith Brevour T. Baker

(Reference 4 for above, Reference 22 has details, P. 92, 93, 96, 179) How did it happen? After previous attempts to push the Federal Reserve Act through Congress, a group of bankers funded and staffed Woodrow Wilson's campaign for President. He had committed to sign this act. In 1913, a Senator, Nelson Aldrich, maternal grandfather to the Rockefellers, pushed the Federal Reserve Act through Congress just before Christmas when much of Congress was on vacation (Reference 3, 4, 5). When elected, Wilson passed the FED. Later, Wilson remorsefully replied (referring to the FED), "I have unwittingly ruined my country"


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: auditthehead; banking; banks; chat; fed; federalreserve; finance; ntsa; paranoia; paranoid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-153 next last
To: reasonisfaith
Given the manner in which the Fed has presented itself and the way it conducts its business, there is no reasonable path to deem it an honest, or an honorable, enterprise.

So then why demand an audit? You'll only belive it if it says what you already believe anyway.

121 posted on 01/01/2019 12:01:36 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

You’re a conspiracy nut and impervious to evidence that contradicts your imagination.


122 posted on 01/01/2019 12:01:56 PM PST by Pelham (Secure Voter ID. Mexico has it, because unlike us they take voting seriously)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
And about how the goal of an audit is adversely positioned relative to the goals of the entity being audited.

Nonsense.

A conscientiously run enterprise welcomes audits. At least the outcome - the process can be a real PITA.

By the way, the Fed welcomes audits.

123 posted on 01/01/2019 12:04:46 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
This line of thinking will lead you to necessary conclusions about who should be doing the auditing.

I had a feeling you couldn't name an acceptable auditor.

124 posted on 01/01/2019 12:06:45 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

The audit wouldn’t be for my benefit—I think this should be more than obvious.

At question is the behavior of the Federal Reserve ever since its founding.


125 posted on 01/01/2019 7:17:27 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

The “conspiracy” label doesn’t work anymore. One of the reasons for this is the content of emails revealed by Wikileaks.

The Federal Reserve is reaping what it has sown. Not complicated. Inevitable.


126 posted on 01/01/2019 7:17:45 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

The Federal Reserve only welcomes audits by parties they approve beforehand. This behavior alone indicts them.


127 posted on 01/01/2019 7:18:32 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

An acceptable party to do the auditing would be any with the necessary skills, a real moral conscience and an ideologically neutral position regarding the Federal Reserve.

And one more thing—an auditor with adequate physical protection against retaliation by the Federal Reserve.


128 posted on 01/01/2019 7:19:31 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
An acceptable party to do the auditing would be any with the necessary skills, a real moral conscience and an ideologically neutral position regarding the Federal Reserve.

Right. And I guess you're going to be the one to judge their skills, conscience and ideology.

After the fact, of course.

Google 'no true Scotsman fallacy'.

129 posted on 01/01/2019 8:11:16 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Yeah it does. You’re either a troll trying to make conservatives look like conspiracy kooks or you’re one yourself.


130 posted on 01/01/2019 8:12:17 PM PST by Pelham (Secure Voter ID. Mexico has it, because unlike us they take voting seriously)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

Of course not.

In the world there is that which is good, and that which is other than good.

Confusion between the two is easily avoided.


131 posted on 01/01/2019 10:40:56 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

American patriots believe in doing business openly.

The behavior of secretive institutions runs contrary to what patriots believe.

Those who steal from this country are the enemy of American patriots. Very dangerous ground. Hence their secrets.


132 posted on 01/01/2019 10:51:03 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

President John F. Kennedy
Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, New York City
April 27, 1961


133 posted on 01/01/2019 10:53:23 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Ok, then why is a private company allowed to determine interest rates?

Why would their chairman be chosen by POTUS?

What other private company allows that?


134 posted on 01/01/2019 10:56:12 PM PST by Fledermaus (If the rule of law no longer exist, then what is the point?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

President John F. Kennedy
Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, New York City
April 27, 1961


135 posted on 01/01/2019 10:56:49 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Pelham; semimojo; upsdriver; MNDude; Celerity; ClearCase_guy; grania; blam; mountainlion; ...

This recent bill in congress might be a very good test of whether or not it’s still possible to hold them accountable to the people:

H.R.24 - To require a full audit of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve banks by the Comptroller General of the United States, and for other purposes.

Sponsor: Rep. Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4] (Introduced 01/03/2019)

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/24?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%225404%22%5D%7D


136 posted on 01/06/2019 10:15:08 AM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

That would be very nice. PS: whatever happened to breaking ties with Syria over the murder in their embassy or balancing the budget etc ad nauseum


137 posted on 01/06/2019 10:26:59 AM PST by grania ("We're all just pawns in their game")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Thank you for the post.


138 posted on 01/06/2019 10:52:39 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Looks good.


139 posted on 01/06/2019 11:03:14 AM PST by BTerclinger (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
...whether or not it’s still possible to hold them accountable to the people.

Unfortunately, in this case that means having politicians, many with a very short term perspective, setting or trying to set interest rates.

Terrifying idea.

140 posted on 01/06/2019 11:52:03 AM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson