Posted on 06/21/2016 1:43:50 PM PDT by WayneDupreeShow
If youre wondering why Donald Trump is so popular Republicans are sick of electing good conservatives, only to watch them cave to the bullying tactics of those so very tolerant and nice liberals. One by one, elected Republicans compromise away their principles to sit at the cool kid table. Paul Ryan used to be pretty cool.
Speaker Paul Ryan is joining Apples Tim Cook for a fundraiser next week in California. A couple of days ago Cook said Apple will not be sending any money to the GOP convention because they do not agree with Donald Trump. Im sure that Ryan heard that but he has excepted the invitation from the same guy because Cook is going to put money in Ryans pocket.
Hey Wisconsin, are you listening? Your boy Paul Ryan sold you out. He is enriching himself at your expense. He is aligning himself with dirty corporations that want you to be poor and unemployed and take your jobs overseas for dirt cheap labor. Now these corporations are also importing dirt cheap sweatshop workers here and making you pay for their entitlements. Why would you vote for Paul Ryan again?
(Excerpt) Read more at headlinepolitics.com ...
Ryan is just whoring himself so one of his pimps, Cook in this case, will give him spending money.
Whatever ambiguity some may claim as to the Constitutional intent on other issues, there is absolute clarity as to the functional intent with respect to one overriding issue. That issue, the primary issue in the 2016 Presidential campaign is clearly to determine whom the new President will have the duty to serve; whose interests must be honored; which people must be favored. To address this issue, we start with the stated purpose of the Constituion--the avowed intent of the framers--the ratified intent of the subscribing States--the Preamble:
We the people of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
"The people" to define the purpose & function of the Constitution, were beyond any question, the people of the specific ratifying States, in 1787 to 1791. "Justice" can sometimes be rather an abstract concept, but "domestic tranquility," obviously is our domestic tranquility, not the promotion of anything abroad, not calling for meddling with other peoples lives. (Nor will reviewing the specific grants of power that follow, suggest any non-American focus or purpose for either.)
The "common defence," both from the obvious context, as well as the specific grants of function that follow, is clearly the common protection of the people of the 13 sovereign States that ratified; as, indeed, the "general Welfare" is that generally beneficial of those same specific peoples.
Finally, with unmistakable clarity, is the language that identifies who precisely are to be the beneficiaries of the secured "Blessings of Liberty": The Founders & their "posterity"; the lineal descendants of those specific peoples; the descendants of the Founders, down through the generations.
Is anything in this interpretation, even arguable? Does this statement of intent waffle in anyway, as an indication of whose interest is to be favored on any Constitutional question that involves Americans on the one hand, and any other people under the sun? Is there anything in this that suggests a duty to allow any other people a right--that is a Constitutional right to demand entrance into America; or to demand anything from the American Government under a claim of legal or moral right?
Now granted, a great many of us, our selves included, trace our ancestry to those who came after the Constitutional Union was established. Thus, our personal rights of participation grow out of acceptance into those communities Blessed with that secured Liberty in the various States. They do not, by anything in the Constitution, create a departure from the Constitutional purpose or concept. Nor can anyone, in office, claim a moral right to alter the intent & functional purpose, he has sworn to uphold, on his own initiative.
Those Republicans, such as Speaker Ryan, who wring their hands in the public media, over Donald Trump's sometimes blunt ways of explaining alternatives, may try to cloud these points. They cannot rebut them if we stick to the obvious. If you honor Constitutional intent, in all things relating to the behavior of the American Government, you must always put America & the Americans first.
When challenged, the unapologetic Conservative American should simply return to the basic concept!
Yet note: Nothing, in what we have written, will prevent anyone, who feels a calling to preach their Faith to the people of another land; or to become a medical missionary in some far off country; or to pursue any particular calling or interest anywhere on earth; from doing so. All it does, is define what one can do with respect to the resources, functional duties, powers and policy imperatives, entrusted to the Government of the Unites States.
That is the point. And properly argued, it is the key to victory--to Donald Trump's victory & to America's victory!
Yes, Laura brought this up. He’s a whore. Where does he go, though, with his money, once his country falls into chaos? Does his wall just get higher around his house? Is he already prepping toilet paper?
Mr. Dupree, your preaching to the choir. What else is new with Ryan? Certainly not his devotion to the GOP. To the GOPe yes. Answer???? Two terms and back to the salt mines with the rest of us.
What a traitor
Worse than Boehner
Who must feel vindicated
Paul Ryan used to be pretty cool.
___________________________________________
Used to be ???
Used to sit at the cool kid table ???
When was that ???
He always was and is...
He was a cool kid liberal in the summer of 2012...
Willard would never have chosen Paul Ryan for a running mate if he had an ounce of Conservatism in his little pinky...
Willard hates Reagan Conservatives...
Willard likes to hang with his homies, the guys who are liberals in Conservative clothing...
Who do you think are invited to those exclusive boys only weekends of Willard’s in Park City, Utah ???
There’s usually no Conservatives amongst them...
Theyre war strategy sessions on how to best knife the Conservatives in the back...
This year it was about how to cheat Trump out of his place as the lawfully elected Republican nominee ...
LOL!
But hey Apple is above criticism on FR, so obviously what Cook is doing is good for us all.
You dont want to be a “Apple hater”, do you????
IBTZ
Primary this bass turd! Go Nehlen!
I have app,e products however if you were to EVER wonder why LYIN RYAN wants open borders LOOK NO FURTHER!!!
It IS imperative for Mr. Trump that this BASTARD loses the primary!!! After the convention I hope Trump and Nehlen take this SOB to the woodshed!!!
That’s one of Ryan’s paymasters.
What about Scott Walker’s comments to the convention delegates about going there own way?
EPIC is located in WS...see who they are and the clout they have...they, along with fed gov, control a 1/6 of our economy now. surprisingly they had the ONLY software that met ALL of the gov specifications for collecting all healthcare data and the code is their code! control control control. So now why do you think ryan got “chosen” to be the speaker of the house!
Apple always WAS Liberal... nothing New...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.