Zillions of Fake Trump-Troll Twitter/FB/Forum Accounts Popping Up Left-and-Right

Reaganite Republican ^ | 22 February 2016 | Reaganite Republican

[Reaganite Republican]

He's definitely thorough -and thoroughly devious- I'll give him that.

But besides apparently buying-out apparently Breitbart, (aka 'Trumpbart' lol) Trump is now unleashing wave-after-wave of online trolls to attack every single pro-Cruz post...
and twirl their virtual pom-poms in your face.

They are very easy to spot, tho- 20 - 100 followers, lame sunset or some such background they found in 5 seconds, one 'character' trait like 'I'm a trucker', and typically a profile photo that looks like a model or some other 'winner'.

And they always link Trump's own twitter account on EVERY thread... apparently getting paid per post. It's obvious they all work of the same list of talking points- when challenged in-depth, they don't seem to really understand anything but the basics... like anybody's first week on the job, I guess.

They all seem to have an assigned character, usually are anchored to a specific issue/block of voters... 'Jews for Trump', Trump-Texas, whatever. There were a bunch of Iowa/NH/SC characters on there lately -who all have disappeared- only to be replaced by a whole slew of new ones throughout Dixie today.

I've had one assigned to my website, and one to my FB page... both of which attacked pro-Cruz posts at any hour of the day or night until I blocked them.

They also jam all online polls for Trump- thus, he polls 65-85% after every debate, yet pulls a weak 32.5% when he scores his 'big win'- hardly what you might call dominating.

And they love to tell you how the race is all but over when Trump has merely 
70 of the 1257 delegates required to win the nomination- please.

These trolls always engage politely in a transparent -and brief- 
charm offensive, but it doesn't take much resistance before they start telling me what an idiot I am... and in terms that would make even The Donald blush (picture a darker orange or perhaps cinnamon color).

They also work in teams... if I get into it with one of them before I notice it's a fake-looking account, 2-3 others promptly appear to lynch me/chant in unison.

Some pathetic efforts at acting can be seen as well, of Facebook, twitter, even on Free Republic these days. Some pose as 'disillusioned' Cruz fans, others say they were 'never for Trump' and they're Christian and/or conservative and will be 'glad to support him' in the general.

That's because the Trump campaign knows perfectly well there are legions of conservatives so astonished by a GOP primary that could nominate a lifelong liberal and potential tyrant that we just might stay home if he's foisted upon us.

I would hate to do it -held my nose and voted for Romney last time- but Trump is simply not acceptable to large swathes of the voting public. And numbers bear this out, regardless of how loud he and his trolls/supporters shout at us.

[higgmeister]

I've been here since 1998. I support Trump. Just to be clear, I don't TrusTed. I think he's a shrewd, self-serving, Harvard educated, first term senator with a CFR, Goldman Sacs wife who's had his eye on the WH since before he ran for senate, hiding behind Christ and the constitution for political advantage.

Amazing, I couldn't have said it better and more succinctly if I had said it myself, except to mention my tag line, Ted Cruz, he's not bona fide either.

[mplsconservative]

Ignore that poster. They are a juvenile flame thrower that just wants to create contention.

[trisham]

Well said.

[trisham]

LOL!

[Stentor]

A real tweet from Trump

It is so important to audit The Federal Reserve, and yet Ted Cruz missed the vote on the bill that would allow this to be done.— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 22, 2016

[higgmeister]

I'm trying to understand why a trump-pet who doesn't fit the description would feel the need to inject themselves as a party to a post that does not pertain to them? A trump-esque narcissistic-ego perhaps?

I am trying to understand why you think you have made a "wondrous revelation" by finding a few noobs that are voting for Trump, when there are large numbers of Trump supporters that have been here over fifteen years? Your rantings and duplicitous denials make you sound like a full "bull goose loony."

[mplsconservative]

Hee. I had to look up bull goose loony after you said that. I’ve lived in the upper midwest my entire life and never heard that term. It’s fitting. And thank you. I like to learn something new everyday.

[higgmeister]

I love fun phrases. I suspect it is the result of being around colorfully peculiar Southern relatives.

And the term does fit doesn't it?     ;^)

[tefis]

True dat!

[combat_boots]

You mean it’s NOT an Alberta $1 CAN coin?

[jaydee770]

Well, I posted a list of 17 relatively recent FR signups that are rabid trump-pets slinging mud for trump. And I followed it up with the disclaimer that I have no idea if they are paid by the post. I just made the observation — factual observation — that they are recent FR sign-ups and they support trump exclusively. That was my original reply that was in the message thread you responded to.

Basically, like trump, you were replying way out of context of the thread (if you follow the replies back up). Not surprising for a trump-pet, actually.

Don’t get all butt-hurt if you get righteously corrected. Show us all how gracious a trump-pet can be! Defy the stereotype!

[jaydee770]

"...I am trying to understand why you think you have made a 'wondrous revelation'..."

And all too typical of rabid trump-pets, you can only make a lame point by lying and claiming folks say what they didn't say. AT NO TIME DID I CLAIM ANYTHING "wondrous" about anything. I did not even imply it. Veiled or otherwise. You are making up crap out of whole cloth (as you trump-pets seem addicted to doing)!

ALL I DID was make a factual observation of 17 posters who are clearly "trump-pets for trump" who are relatively recent sign-ups to FR. I also said, "make of it what you will". And I further added the disclaimer that I had no idea if they were paid by the post.

If you want the list of the 17 relatively recently created FR trump-pet accounts, I will gladly fwd them (I won't post them again). Look at their posting history and make of them what you wish. I'm just making the factual observation of trump coming on the scene and these accounts being created on FR. Could be entirely coincidental.

So why is it that trump-pets always have to make up crap out of whole cloth, stating as fact I was making a "wondrous" claim about anything? Is it that you are following the example of your messianic candidate? Must you insist on demonstrating "Juvenile-Fallacious-Bonding" right here in public for all to see? Have a bit of pride! Surely you are better than that?

[mplsconservative]

Yessire!

[higgmeister]

ALL I DID was make a factual observation of 17 posters who are clearly "trump-pets for trump" who are relatively recent sign-ups to FR. I also said, "make of it what you will". And I further added the disclaimer that I had no idea if they were paid by the post.

If your comment meant nothing, why did you make it? If you think it was important enough to report the noobies like an NSA threat matrix screening, why don't you have the cajones to admit it?

[jaydee770]

"...If your comment meant nothing, why did you make it?..."

Because it was topical to the thread! I said, "make of it what you will" and you trump-pets sure are "making something of it" -- all too typically (and hilariously). You're all peeing-backwards over a simple observation and creating out of whole cloth, claims that were never made, ie. "NSA threat matrix screening". LOL! Really? Are you that much of a drama queen? Or, as you seem intent on continuing to demonstrate, you are deeply inflicted with a bad case of "juvenile-fallacious-bonding" and like your candidate, you just can't help yourselves from getting all overly dramatic and butt-hurt over it:

(I guess I need to keep adding this until it penetrates the obtuseness...)

[higgmeister]

Because it was topical to the thread! I said, "make of it what you will" and you trump-pets sure are "making something of it" -- all too typically (and hilariously). You're all peeing-backwards over a simple observation and creating out of whole cloth, claims that were never made, ie. "NSA threat matrix screening". LOL! Really? Are you that much of a drama queen? Or, as you seem intent on continuing to demonstrate, you are deeply inflicted with a bad case of "juvenile-fallacious-bonding" and like your candidate, you just can't help yourselves from getting all overly dramatic and butt-hurt over it:

The way the-powers-that-be watch us on FR, with your unhinged allegations and raging rants, I'm sure you will appear on a watch list before the rest of us.