Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One-on-One Match-ups - Trump Persuasion Series [Scott Adams {Dilbert}]
Dilbert ^ | October 1, 2015 | Scott Adams

Posted on 10/05/2015 8:57:08 AM PDT by beaversmom

Warning: This post will generate massive cognitive dissonance in some readers. If you think you can learn from that, please read on. If that prospect makes you uncomfortable, please don’t read it.

If you compare Donald Trump to whoever you have in mind as your ideal president, Trump probably comes up short. There are plenty of qualities one might want in a president that Trump doesn’t have. So I understand why people think he can’t get elected.

But Trump will not be running against anyone’s imaginary standard for president. He will run against real people. That’s where things get interesting. In my opinion, Trump only got serious about the presidency when he realized that the one-on-one match-ups all went his way. So let’s see how those match-ups look.

Here I am going to put a Trump filter on the opponents, meaning I will paint them the way Trump has, and will. That’s the best way to judge the head-to-head competition because the media will report every word Trump says.

Here are Trump’s competitors, as branded by Trump.

Rubio: Sweaty kid who lied about doing his homework while Trump built a business empire. Got “rolled over” on Obamacare, like a rube, in case you had not made that linguistic connection.

Clinton: A “major security risk” and a grandmother who can’t do email right while Trump dominates Twitter.

Carson: A doctor who is too nice to negotiate deals. The only job he created was for one nurse. (And for Carson to win, one must believe the Republican base wants 16 years of of continuous African-American presidents.)

Sanders: Can you win if you get zero Republican votes?

Fiorina: HP failure. Lucent failure. And of course, the “face” which many men interpret to mean her angry-wife persona. Compare that mixture of failure and anger to Trump’s business success (so he tells us) and positive message about America.

Bush: Low-energy, and yet another Bush. We already see how that is working out for Bush.

Biden: Biden says he isn’t sure he has the “emotional energy” to run. How does that match up against Trump? Ask Jeb Bush.

The rest: Career politicians. Trump will chain their corporate donors to them like anchors and push them off the boat to see how well they swim.

So there are your match-ups. Since I am still mostly alone in predicting a landslide Trump victory in the general election, please tell me which one of these match-ups you think Trump could lose.

I think this is another situation in which my degree in economics, along with my MBA, have wired me to think differently. The most important thing one learns when studying business and the economy is how to make valid comparisons. For example, one must always ignore sunk costs (the past) and one must compare all options to real alternatives, not to an ideal.

If you think Trump will lose, you are probably comparing him to an ideal you hold for what a president should be. If you believe he will win, you probably have a background in economics, or law, or engineering, and you have learned how to make valid comparisons to alternatives.

That’s your cognitive dissonance set-up. If you feel you are a rational person who knows how to weigh alternatives, let me know how any of the competitors could win in a one-on-one match-up with Trump.

If I did this right, and I am sure I did, I predict you will see the biggest mess of word-salad in the comments that you have ever seen. Roughly one-third of the comments to this post should make no sense whatsoever (as opposed to an opinion you simply disagree with).

And I remind you that I don’t know whether Trump would be a good president. I am not that smart. I just enjoy the show.


TOPICS: Humor; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2016election; arkansas; bencarson; berniesanders; california; carlyfiorina; delaware; dilbert; election2016; florida; hillaryclinton; hitlery; jebbush; joebiden; johnkasich; marcorubio; newyork; ohio; scottadams; trump; vermont
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Thanks beaversmom.

21 posted on 10/05/2015 11:57:42 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Your post reeks of reality and logic and common sense, very rare these days. Keep up the good work!


22 posted on 10/05/2015 12:11:10 PM PDT by entropy12 (When you vote for a candidate, you are actually voting for his rich donors! Trump has no rich donors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

That’s bad enough.

I see he also blogs and takes a lot of heat (hate) from the Leftists.

‘Course all that means is that he maybe works too hard and makes too much money, etc.

Also that he’s generally happy and productive.


23 posted on 10/05/2015 12:40:18 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook; Fightin Whitey

Trump: strong on military strength but will not jump into unnecessary wars.

Trump: Fiscal conservative...almost all successful business people are.

Trump: Social moderate..has evolved more conservative with age. But he is by no means hard right social conservative. Do not expect him to bomb abortion clinics.


24 posted on 10/05/2015 1:10:53 PM PDT by entropy12 (When you vote for a candidate, you are actually voting for his rich donors! Trump has no rich donors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

We were talking about Scott Adams.

But thank you for your ground-breaking comments.


25 posted on 10/06/2015 4:58:51 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey

Sorry about that, I did not back track enough posts.


26 posted on 10/06/2015 5:07:16 PM PDT by entropy12 (When you vote for a candidate, you are actually voting for his rich donors! Trump has no rich donors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

I can’t fault this analysis at all.

Trump will destroy Hillary in the general election.

L


27 posted on 10/06/2015 5:14:55 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

You must be a thought leader


28 posted on 10/11/2015 9:34:15 AM PDT by datricker ( Make America Great Again - Why not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson