Posted on 06/06/2015 12:52:43 PM PDT by PROCON
LATELY I’ve been running into people even more put off by the Clintons than the nefarious operatives in the “vast right wing conspiracy” ever were.
They’re called Democrats.
I had breakfast with one last week. I’d quote him directly, but The Times doesn’t permit profanity.
He’s furious at Hillary and Bill, because they’ve once again created all these ugly, obvious messes that they could and should have avoided. He’s disgusted, because he has come to believe that they’re tainted.
He’s also resolute: He’s voting — even rooting — for Hillary.
Party loyalty motivates him. On top of which, he’s worried about the Supreme Court and how a Republican president might pack it.
And he keeps hearing the voices of little girls in his life who have asked him whether a woman can be president of the United States in reality, not just on some TV show.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Gawd, I hope so.
“””
But will the 2015 Hillary baggage and low polling carry over to November 2016?”””
This article is telling you the baggage doesn’t matter. These people will vote for her if she’s wearing orange.
I know what Bruni is saying, but there is sure to be more damaging “baggage” yet to come.
He’s also resolute: He’s voting — even rooting — for Hillary.
Typical brain damaged rat. So if Satan (and she might as well be) running for POTUS as a rat - this guy will be resolute? These people are nuts.
It's a good think Hitler wasn't a woman. This poor fool would have no choice but to vote for him/her.
Democrats put party above all else. To a Democrat, the (D) behind a candidate’s name is all that counts. If a cancer cell were running for office a Democrat would vote for it no matter what.
He doesn’t need to worry about the Supreme Court. “Conservative” nominees picked by Republican presidents have a way of becoming moderates or liberals once they have been confirmed (2 of Nixon’s 4, 2 of Reagan’s 4, 1 of Bush-41’s 2, 1 of Bush-43’s 2).
He’s also resolute: He’s voting — even rooting — for Hillary.
Party loyalty motivates him. On top of which, he’s worried about the Supreme Court and how a Republican president might pack it.
And he keeps hearing the voices of little girls in his life who have asked him whether a woman can be president of the United States in reality, not just on some TV show.
He wants them to see: Yes, she can.
This is a typical Clinton spin article. Don’t deny the foulness, embrace it, celebrate it. Yeah, the bitch feels your pain. Yeah, go ahead and gripe. Then vote for her anyway.
If that doesn’t make any sense, it’s because you’re a conservative. Collectivists think differently - to them, loyalty is the only thing that matters.
I’m sorry, I didn’t make that clear. Is your house on fire? Because if it is, and you’re a liberal, you won’t leave, fight the fire, or call the fire department unless and until you can confirm that that would show loyalty.
But you still don’t get it. You think I just gave you a metaphor. No. Reread the article. They agree she’s a criminal, untrustworthy, foul, unqualified and a traitor and they don’t like her at all - and she’s responding with agreement and an order for them to vote for her anyway.
No metaphor. Real zombies.
God Save the Republic!
Maybe Hitler should have gotten transgendered. Then they wouldn’t keep demonizing him. After all, he did have gender problems.
What a bad writer Bruni is. All those wittle giwls in his fwiend’s wife.
They’re called Yellow dogs.
Go back and check out some Free Republic posts prior to last November. You'd be surprised to find that attitude's not exclusive to "D" voters.
No, wait...you don't have to look back that far. They're still here on occasion, gearing up for 2016.
nyt psyops and disinformation.
The reported attitude reflected by the vermin in the article is why I claim Hillary is a shoe in. The same demographic that had to have their negro must have their female.
And Bruni continues to flack for her.
Two-bit 'Rat hack.
To put in a context people can identify with; Hillary could personally behead the present Pope in front of 300 million TV viewers and would still win the election; receiving a majority of votes from devout Catholics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.