Gawd, I hope so.
“””
But will the 2015 Hillary baggage and low polling carry over to November 2016?”””
This article is telling you the baggage doesn’t matter. These people will vote for her if she’s wearing orange.
He’s also resolute: He’s voting — even rooting — for Hillary.
Typical brain damaged rat. So if Satan (and she might as well be) running for POTUS as a rat - this guy will be resolute? These people are nuts.
It's a good think Hitler wasn't a woman. This poor fool would have no choice but to vote for him/her.
Democrats put party above all else. To a Democrat, the (D) behind a candidate’s name is all that counts. If a cancer cell were running for office a Democrat would vote for it no matter what.
He doesn’t need to worry about the Supreme Court. “Conservative” nominees picked by Republican presidents have a way of becoming moderates or liberals once they have been confirmed (2 of Nixon’s 4, 2 of Reagan’s 4, 1 of Bush-41’s 2, 1 of Bush-43’s 2).
He’s also resolute: He’s voting — even rooting — for Hillary.
Party loyalty motivates him. On top of which, he’s worried about the Supreme Court and how a Republican president might pack it.
And he keeps hearing the voices of little girls in his life who have asked him whether a woman can be president of the United States in reality, not just on some TV show.
He wants them to see: Yes, she can.
This is a typical Clinton spin article. Don’t deny the foulness, embrace it, celebrate it. Yeah, the bitch feels your pain. Yeah, go ahead and gripe. Then vote for her anyway.
If that doesn’t make any sense, it’s because you’re a conservative. Collectivists think differently - to them, loyalty is the only thing that matters.
I’m sorry, I didn’t make that clear. Is your house on fire? Because if it is, and you’re a liberal, you won’t leave, fight the fire, or call the fire department unless and until you can confirm that that would show loyalty.
But you still don’t get it. You think I just gave you a metaphor. No. Reread the article. They agree she’s a criminal, untrustworthy, foul, unqualified and a traitor and they don’t like her at all - and she’s responding with agreement and an order for them to vote for her anyway.
No metaphor. Real zombies.
What a bad writer Bruni is. All those wittle giwls in his fwiend’s wife.
nyt psyops and disinformation.
The reported attitude reflected by the vermin in the article is why I claim Hillary is a shoe in. The same demographic that had to have their negro must have their female.
And Bruni continues to flack for her.
Two-bit 'Rat hack.
All he had to do was to have voted McCain-Palin in 2008. Sarah would either be a shoo-in for 2016 or McCain would have retired in 2012 and President Sarah would be running for re-election in 2016.
Amazing, isn't it, how the Left complicates things!
To a Leftist, a woman only counts if she is a Leftist.
To a Leftist, a Black only counts if he or she is a Leftist.
It could... the question is whether she's going to pull a Lazio move where he "violated" her "space" and attempt to pull the "little woman routine on a motivated Ted Cruz or similar.
I do suspect that she will pull the card at a time which will suit her.