Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex OMB chief Stockman: "It is the biggest speculative disaster in human history."
Zero Hedge ^ | March 01, 2015 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 03/31/2015 7:59:48 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76

David Alan Stockman interviewed on CBS-TV 60 Minutes (October 2010)

Highlights of recent interview by Harry Dent.

David Stockman: People don't want to hear the reality and the truth that we're facing. But I think there is an enormous appetite out in the country to get a different perspective than what you have from the media day in and day out, so I say the fed is out of control. Its balance sheet is exploded. It's printing money like never before.

Zero interest rates for 70 months have basically destroyed the pricing function in the financial markets. I said that as a result of this, Wall Street has become a huge casino which basically rewards gamblers, but it is not functioning as a capital raising, capital allocating instrument, which really is what the financial markets should do in a free market system. I warned about the size of the federal debt.

I'm an old budget director from the Reagan days. We had a trillion dollar national debt, a 3 trillion economy when I started. Today, it's 18 trillion. Eighteen fold gain in the last 35 years versus maybe a fourfold gain in the economy. So all of these trends are taking our economy in a direction that is dangerous, that is not sustainable, and is likely to fully undermine everything that's been built up and created by the American people over decades and decades.

So people don't want to hear the warning. They don't want to hear the truth in the establishment, in Wall Street, in Washington, but I think out in the country they must.

* * *

David Stockman: Well it's obvious that Wall Street is addicted to cheap money and unlimited flow of new liquidity into the markets. Traders can then borrow money on an overnight basis for five basis points, which is nothing. Buy anything with a yield like a ten-year or five-year bond or speculate in stocks that they think might be going up or even get fancier and go into derivatives or commodity futures or whatever. And then capture the profit or the spread between the cheap money that the fed is putting into the overnight market and the yield or profit they're making on the asset, and they're leveraging way up.

You know, 90 percent, 95 percent in many cases. So obviously, the whole financial market is dependent on this, but it comes at a cost. It is destroying savers in America. If you worked a lifetime and saved $100,000.00, you're making $400.00 a year in interest from a lifetime of savings. I think there will be a revolt sooner or later of the American public against this disastrous crushing of the saver in order to essentially accommodate Wall Street's appetite for liquidity.

* * *

David Stockman: Well you know, the problem is the Federal Reserve, I've described, is a rogue institution. It's operating beyond any of the legislative intent or statutory authority that's been given to them over the years. They have essentially become a national monetary planning agency that has decided they can drive the daily, weekly, monthly movement of the economy by manipulating interest rates and the yield curve by putting a put under the stock prices by essentially trying to drive the entire $18 trillion or $17 trillion US economy from Wall Street. That is fundamentally at variance with the requisites of a healthy capitalist economy. You need an honest financial market. Not a manipulated one.

You need price discovery by people that have their money at risk, not the central bank.

Harry Dent: Actually, it's a centrally planned economy, isn't it?

David Stockman: Right, exactly.

* * *

Harry Dent: So David, do you think the republican congress can save us from this economic sundown that we've been discussing today?

David Stockman: Well I would like to think so, and they talk a good game, but unfortunately when push comes to shove, they're in the consensus with everyone else in the beltway in Washington and are unwilling to take on the hard issues.

We are borrowing still $600 billion in the last year, six years after allegedly the great recession ended, and we are setting ourselves up for trillion dollar deficits again, the next time the economy stumbles or we have a recession or some other dislocation.

The fact is the fed has not abolished the business cycle. The fed has not made the world completely safe from these kinds of dislocations.

So therefore, we need to look at what's driving this huge deficit, and the answer is big entitlements and big defense spending, and the republicans are unwilling to take on the Pentagon. They want more, and they're afraid to take on Social Security and the entitlements because they believe that is going to be problematic politically.

So therefore, nothing is being done about the structure of this deficit problem, and we're just basically stumbling our way into another huge crisis in ballooning national debt.

* * *

David Stockman: Well, it's one of the scariest moments I think in our history, but also we need to recognize we're in uncharted waters. No central bank has ever printed this much money this long, kept interest rates at zero, fueled so much speculation. Not just here, but worldwide. Not just in the normal stocks and bonds, but the whole shale boom, for instance, in the United States was massively funded by cheap debt based on oil prices that weren't sustainable, and now that's all coming unwound. We have never had deficits of ten percent of GDP back to back, or even still four or five percent four or five years into a recovery.

We have a runaway budget where the population is getting older and older, 10,000 people are retiring every day. Nothing is being done about Social Security. It's a festering time bomb, and we're not sure how it will explode, but we know it isn't sustainable.

We have a Wall Street that is more addicted to pure overnight gambling and trading and speculation for the ultra short run that is driven by robo traders, the so-called HFT money, like never before. It's unstable. That's why we see things happen like the overnight 40 percent gain with the Swiss Franc when the Swiss National Bank pulled the pay.

Forty percent overnight – not overnight, but in a couple of minutes or seconds when there were hundreds of billions of short positions in the Swiss Franc. All of these things have never existed simultaneously, not only in the United States, but worldwide. All the central banks are doing it.

We're reaching the point where it's unsustainable, things are going to give and break, but the good thing is it's going to be more a disaster in the financial markets in my view, less some kind of Great Depression impact on Main Street. It will be difficult on Main Street, but Wall Street is in the gun sites of this disaster coming.

* * *

David Stockman: In the long run, we have to get off this debt addiction. We need to get back to sound finance both in government and households, but beginning between here and there is going to cause enormous pain for millions of households who have been herded into risky investments, junk bond funds, stock market funds, high flying biotech stocks and on and on because they were told it's the only place to be.

If you put your money in a CD, you get no return. If you put your money in a safe bond, you get almost no return. Now when the big reset, as Harry calls it, happens, and the stock market drops by large magnitudes, 50 percent, more, those people who were herded into these risky investments late in life – Because remember, we have the baby boom, you know, heading towards their retirement homes, are going to be badly hurt at a time that they can't recover, and it will be a massive injustice that is being done by Washington and the fed to this current generation of middle class Americans.

That will produce, in my view, a political reaction, a political revolt that will begin to say, "What's wrong here? Who believed that printing money out of thin air can make a society wealthier? Why did we do that? Who believed that we can actually create jobs and new economic output on Main Street simply by having the fed press a button and create another billion dollars?"

* * *

David Stockman: Yeah, I agree with that, and the point to remember is that massive money printing by central banks on a worldwide basis is inherently deflationary for two reasons. One, it fuels massive financial speculation. When we talk about speculation, we're talking about professional gamblers who borrow 95 cents and use that borrowed money that they pay practically nothing for to buy stocks or bonds or commodities or derivatives or biotech stocks and so forth as I indicated. All of that buying power is artificial. That is not coming from production today, real effort in the economy. That's coming from newly minted credit.

So it takes asset prices to unreasonable, unsustainable levels. They crash, and that creates a negative economic cycle. Secondly, massive money printing makes capital and debt too cheap to the real sector of the economy. So therefore, massive capital investments are made on the basis of cheap cost of capital, not on the basis of the likely return or sustainable return over time.

* * *

David Stockman: Yeah, a famous American economist once said anything that's unsustainable tends to stop. My argument is that we're at the stop point. The fed has been printing money like there's no tomorrow really for 25 years since Greenspan took over in 1987. They are now at the point where their balance sheet has become so bloated, so enormous that even the people running the fed are confused about what to do. They've painted themselves into a corner, and they're playing it by the day, and they're going to make a huge mistake. So the money printing thing is near an end.

Secondly, our political system has become totally non-functional. We have a lame duck president who can accomplish nothing, a congress that is totally paralyzed, meaning that before 2017 at the earliest, nothing will be done about our fiscal and entitlement explosion.

Finally, the American people have believed falsely that all of this is going to work out. It's not going to. When they find out that the adults so called in Washington had no clue what they were doing, there is going to be a collapse of confidence, and that will flow into the system as well.

* * *

So it seems like this bubble bursting is inevitable. How much time do we have? Is it years, months? How will we know? Are there some clues we can look into to make sure that we're prepared?

David Stockman: There's really no magic numbers here, but it's remarkable that these central bank driven bubbles tend to peak after about six years. The dot com bubble started really in mid-1994 with the famous Netscape IPO. It crashed in March 2000, six years. The housing bubble roughly started in 2002. It totally crashed in 2008. Six years. The meltdown on Wall Street bottomed in March 2009. Add six years. 2015. I think we're at the end of this bubble simply based on the fact that they can't expand forever. They reach an asymptotic peak, and then confidence is lost, a catalyst occurs, a black swan appears, the selling begins, and there's nothing under this market. There is no safety net under this market.

* * *

David Stockman: Yes, there are, and in the short run, that will be painful. There will be great dislocations, both in the financial markets and the real economy. But in the long run, that's a good thing. We have become so dependent on government, we have come to believe that the Federal Reserve drives the economy hour by hour, day by day. None of that is historically true. Real wealth, real prosperity comes from the sweat and from the enterprise and from the invention of people on Main Street, not the politicians on Wall Street who are on the central bank. So I think the big inflection point that we're facing is when the big crash comes, on the other side, maybe we can get back to the private enterprise system and the kind of family self-reliance and thrift and prudence that our prosperity was built on 40 years ago.

* * *

David Stockman: Well in The Great Deformation, I said, "We're heading towards a day of reckoning. This isn't sustainable." It's happening in real time, and in the updates, what I try to do is focus on the catalyst events, the catalyzing forces that will warn us when we're really getting to the edge of the cliff.

That is the central banks. Japan's central bank is out of control. I watch that. It's important to know what happens there because if the great money printing debt experience in Japan finally fails, it's going to be noted in markets all around the world.

I watch the ECB, European Central Bank. It is divided between Germans who want to try to maintain some semblance of some money and the rest of Europe that would like to print and drown themselves in debt as far as the eye can see. It's important to watch China, which is a giant house of cards, that's on the verge of collapse, and that will ricochet around the world in terms of the countries that supply it. Australia, Korea, the so-called emerging markets, and what it'll do to the theory, which I think is false that China is the engine of growth in the world, it is not. It is the biggest speculative disaster in human history.

* * *

David Stockman: Well, the crisis is unfolding by the day. It is not too late to start preparing right noW. Now is the time to begin to save if you can and minimize your outlays for unnecessary luxuries. This is going to be a devastating crisis, and people will be happy down the road if they take the steps to prepare today.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: 114th; 2010; banking; bhoeconomy; bubble; china; currencycrisis; debt; debtcrisis; economy; fed; finance; germany; interview; speculation; stockman; stockmarket; wallstreet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
"David Alan Stockman (born November 10, 1946) is a former businessman and U.S. politician who served as a Republican U.S. Representative from the state of Michigan (1977–1981) and as the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (1981–1985) under President Ronald Reagan."
1 posted on 03/31/2015 7:59:48 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

i’m in cash in my 401k and not contributing any longer. i’m long cash as i can be as a united states serf.


2 posted on 03/31/2015 8:02:51 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

.


3 posted on 03/31/2015 8:04:26 PM PDT by doc1019 (Blue lives matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

This guy is like John Dean. He never goes away.


4 posted on 03/31/2015 8:06:08 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://www.tedcruz.org/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76
And then capture the profit or the spread between the cheap money that the fed is putting into the overnight market and the yield or profit they're making on the asset, and they're leveraging way up.

Why would the Fed be putting money into the overnight market?

5 posted on 03/31/2015 8:11:25 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2

“Add six years. 2015.”

David Stockman: There’s really no magic numbers here, but it’s remarkable that these central bank driven bubbles tend to peak after about six years. The dot com bubble started really in mid-1994 with the famous Netscape IPO. It crashed in March 2000, six years. The housing bubble roughly started in 2002. It totally crashed in 2008. Six years. The meltdown on Wall Street bottomed in March 2009. Add six years. 2015. I think we’re at the end of this bubble simply based on the fact that they can’t expand forever. They reach an asymptotic peak, and then confidence is lost, a catalyst occurs, a black swan appears, the selling begins, and there’s nothing under this market. There is no safety net under this market.


6 posted on 03/31/2015 8:11:27 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

1. Welcome to FreeRepublic.

2. Thanks for posting an interesting article.

3. Thanks *especially* for posting it in full.


7 posted on 03/31/2015 8:13:39 PM PDT by shibumi ("Vampire Outlaw of the Milky Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Federal Funds Rate is the interest rate at which a depository institution lends funds maintained at the Federal Reserve to another depository institution overnight.

The federal funds rate is generally only applicable to the most creditworthy institutions when they borrow and lend overnight funds to each other.

The federal funds rate is one of the most influential interest rates in the U.S. economy, since it affects monetary and financial conditions, which in turn have a bearing on key aspects of the broad economy including employment, growth and inflation.


8 posted on 03/31/2015 8:15:03 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76
The federal funds rate is generally only applicable to the most creditworthy institutions when they borrow and lend overnight funds to each other.

I know, so why did he say the Fed was doing it?

9 posted on 03/31/2015 8:17:59 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

Stockman is so rigt . We are near a run on the banks and a complete collapse in the stockmarket bloated on printed money. If you are in this market — get the hell out and get into land and bullets.


10 posted on 03/31/2015 8:22:48 PM PDT by iowacornman (Speak out with courage!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

It’s traders from the big institutions who are borrowing at the overnight rate of 5 basis points from the Fed and then plowing the borrowed money into other debt instruments for big gains risk free.


11 posted on 03/31/2015 8:24:29 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This guy is like John Dean. He never goes away.


So what if he doesn’t go away.
John Dean is a total POS. Stockman is not.


12 posted on 03/31/2015 8:25:30 PM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76
It’s traders from the big institutions who are borrowing at the overnight rate of 5 basis points from the Fed

How much is the Fed lending overnight? Link?

13 posted on 03/31/2015 8:30:57 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

thx cash out


14 posted on 03/31/2015 8:34:42 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

Wrap it up and shut it down.


15 posted on 03/31/2015 8:44:56 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2

I fail to understand what good cash will be when we have notes similar to Zimbabwe.
I understand precious metals for the long haul; but for the short to mid, cash won’t buy anyone much in a collapse. I can get FAR more for a Bic lighter or a can of spam in trade before a U.S. dollar. Better to spend greenbacks now on “beans and bullets” and metals for after the collapse.


16 posted on 03/31/2015 8:46:44 PM PDT by Ghost of SVR4 (So many are so hopelessly dependent on the government that they will fight to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of SVR4

Fuel is valuable.


17 posted on 03/31/2015 8:47:38 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Why would the Fed be putting money into the overnight market?

Have you ever noticed that David Stockman is never around at the same time as Paul Craig Roberts?

Coincidence? I think not.

18 posted on 03/31/2015 8:47:52 PM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Bernanke, and now Yellen, have kept the the key overnight fed funds rate near zero to encourage large financial institutions to take nearly interest free loans and put the money into bonds or stocks. This has kept the debt expansion going and drives speculation in the stock market. All to good for fiend Obama. Obama enriched the 1% and .1% spectacularly. Their money feeds his campaigns, his pockets, and other lib pockets. On the flip side, enrichment of elites feeds class warfare, Obama’s stock in trade. It also gives Obama a battle cry to use in attacking the 1% and harping on middle class social justice and the rest of the Marxist talking points.


19 posted on 03/31/2015 8:49:34 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76
Bernanke, and now Yellen, have kept the the key overnight fed funds rate near zero .....

Yes, I know. So how much are they lending overnight? Link?

20 posted on 03/31/2015 8:52:07 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson