Posted on 03/10/2015 9:17:20 AM PDT by sickoflibs
Why are so many conservatives, not just Republicans but I mean social-conservatives, unable to form communicate a coherent argument against this logic in interviews and debates?
The latest was Ben Carson’s meltdown where he was asked on CNN if being gay was ‘a choice’ and he replied absolutely, then he offered up prisoners who engage in same sex as his example, then later repudiated and apologized for his response, Ben Carson :
” I do not pretend to know how every individual came to their sexual orientation. I regret that my words to express that concept were hurtful and divisive. For that I apologize unreservedly to all that were offended”
I mean just because some small fraction of Americans have sexual desires or ‘feelings’ (that sounds so much more sensitive) that differ from the majority’s(us) ; why do we have to be forced to change our behavior to make it look normal and validate it(against our wills) .
A perfect example is Christian bakers and wedding photographers forced to certify gay weddings with their services which is a result of gay weddings for marriage’s in many states forced upon them by liberal judges.
The whole premise is because they ‘feel’ differently than we feel, we must change OUR behavior.
Why cant those like Ben Carson who disagree with gay marriage form a coherent argument against this?
This crap is moving very fast. I half expect that in a not very long time all marriages to be legally valid will have to have an LGBT component.
NAW,,,,More likely, churches will be forced to marry same sex couples.
That will come on the way.
No, not everyone has to be a Christian to oppose homosexual behavior. That is not what I said. I suspect Thomas Jefferson was not a Christian. Certainly, Ben Franklin was not. But, the preponderance of the citizenry has to acknowledge that we need some kind of moral foundation from which to craft law. And, the original foundation was the Scriptures of the Torah, w’nebiim, w’kethubim and the letters and books of the New Testament. Without these, you will have a hard time arguing with Muslims that their Koran is not the US Standard. Nor the wiccans, nor the Scientologists, nor the Flying Spaghetti Machine group.
The reason that PETA is incorrect is that they do not accept the view of Scripture that animals are here specifically for us to eat. They are not be revered, they do not possess spirits, they are not equivalent to humans. PETA is using their “feelings”, just as you are, since you have no real reason to argue back with them. I do. I am arguing that they are categorically wrong because they ignore the clear statements of the foundation of truth...the Scriptures.
You are making a case for Sharia law.
Are you Mus-Islam by chance? I am NOT.
And a lot of divorce lawyers are going to be very very rich.
What I’m saying is “don’t answer the fools in their folly”.
Arguing about what’s best for society is getting down in the pig wallow with them.
The way to handle this is to outright accuse them.
They don’t give a hoot about homos. Not at all.
Homos are just a convenient means to the left’s real goal of criminalizing Christianity,
so that they can fulfill their wet dream of
using the power of the state to punish and exterminate
their political opposition.
The same blindness that has overwhelmed the US has overwhelmed you. If you believe I am a Muslim, you cannot read plain English, my FRiend
Do you kill your daughters for their honor because Allah says?
I don't agree with doing that.
I can confirm some of your points from firsthand experience.
The two “married” poofs I know are ALWAYS going to this doctor or that doctor. I don’t ask for what because I don’t care, I’ll most likely get ill listening to details and I can pretty much figure it out anyways.
They (supposedly) cut down in their drinking as well. I can hold my booze (not that I get blitzed that often, I don’t), but either one of those two could make me look like a rookie sipping their first beer.
Even if you were to subtract out their plague, you can see the other lifestyle choices poofs indulge in that kill them off quicker than normal/semi normal people, as STB pointed out.
That's the same sort of logic that got us Obama for two terms, its surrender.
is it possible that Obamacare could make them healthier?
Or do we have to ban sugar drinks?
You must have missed the next line of my post.
I don’t see how you could have gotten “surrender” out of my post.
Do you understand Proverbs 26:4-5?
Both!
/s
I am for banning anything that is even suspected to hurt any minority group through their VOLUNTARY use no matter how small the group is...... even five
After all we know that political ads force people to change their votes, clearly we have no free will and need protection from ourselves....
OHH, except for voting, abortions and gay marriage, those are rights....
I am pretty sure animals feel some pain. But then again, I end an animal’s life pretty #$%^# fast before I eat them.
Every conservative is a
1) racist
2) sexist
3) homophobe.
Next....
Preaching to the choir, FRiend!
Even liberal sex therapist Dr. Ruth admits that the ass was designed for output only.
LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.