Posted on 09/19/2013 9:01:38 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
Remember the endless stream of dire global warming predictions? Since the 1990s we have been insulted with lies and wishful thinking about how we had to turn off our air conditioners and park our cars or be complicit in causing the Northeastern states to be wiped away by tidal waves of melted ice caps. Wrong wrong, wrong! All of them, all but 3%, were lies as in Penn State and the University of East Anglia lies!
Al Gore and his shrinking band of far left lunatics have now been proved wrong merely by comparing their claims to what has actually happened. The truth is as clear and right in front of us.
The machine you are reading this on is killing the Left. They make claims, tell lies and...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Global warming predictions were right 2.6% of the time.
Proving that global warming is happening...an man did it.
And the other 2.6 percent?
Just a lucky guess on their part.
I'm an engineer. I have the sense to preface any assumptions with "Hey, this is a total SWAG (Seriously Wild-Assed Guess), but here's what I think is going on......."
I also have the sense when to say: "This is what is happening. And, here are the data points to back it up...."
I'm still employed, so I guess that I'm right more than 2.6% of the time.
The global warming people don't have any (or much, at least) hard data. They did (and still do) exactly the same thing that I do with assumptions, but neglect to mention the SWAG part.
Their willing accomplices in the media report the assumptions as The Gospel Truth. AND....they ignore the hard data when it disproves some of the earlier assumptions....
Fools, all.
Since when has being dead wrong ever stopped a liberal?
I mean, even a drunken monkey has a better chance at getting facts right than these Gorebull warming fools.
This percentage can only mean they they purposefully and willfully consider the facts and truth about our climate environment. And then report the opposite.
Well, yeah, but...but...but, it’s that 2.6% that we gotta worry about.
Here is the problem.
If you ask me to PROVE global warming or PROVE global cooling using statistics I can easily do that by being free to pick the start and end points in time. It is super easy if one is as dishonest as the glo-bull warming crowd.
I can even pick a time frame where over that time no change occurred even though any honest thinking person would know there was all sorts of change in the middle.
In addition, if I were asked to look for any possible evidence of climate change I would look at recorded temperatures from various mines around the world. They have a great, natural way of averaging out weather related temperature swings and would help get around the cherry picking of data points by the global government types.
Then, armed with the average data from mines, I would look to see if there was ANY correlation between human activity and the change in average temperature. My gut feeling is one yearly volcano fart can offset any phantom reduction in CO2 emissions any carbon tax the “steal from the producers” crowd can create.
I remember reading a popular science magazine around the time of the first earth day (1970) that showed towering icebergs in the Gulf of Mexico, an event that was supposed to happen by 2000.
I live on the Gulf of Mexico and am still waiting for the icebergs to show up. How about you?
The good news is that if you want to know what will happen in the future, negate whatever the AGW crowd is predicting. Worked in Colorado. The AGW crowd was predicting a permanent drought in Colorado.
That’s a pretty good percentage for a liberal cause. Marxism does worse by 2.6%.
Three percent of the time they were right? Surprised it’s that high...
Thanks Oldpuppymax.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.