Posted on 08/14/2013 3:18:00 PM PDT by Whenifhow
“Clearly, any family may be visited by federally paid agents for almost any reason.”
According to an Obamacare provision millions of Americans will be targeted.
The Health and Human Services’ website states that your family will be targeted if you fall under the “high-risk” categories below:
Families where mom is not yet 21. Families where someone is a tobacco user. Families where children have low student achievement, developmental delays, or disabilities. Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States.
There is no reference to Medicaid being the determinant for a family to be “eligible.”
In 2011, the HHS announced $224 million will be given to support evidence-based home visiting programs to “help parents and children.” Individuals from the state will implement these leveraging strategies to “enhance program sustainability.”
Constitutional attorney and author Kent Masterson Brown states,
“This is not a “voluntary” program. The eligible entity receiving the grant for performing the home visits is to identify the individuals to be visited and intervene so as to meet the improvement benchmarks. A homeschooling family, for instance, may be subject to “intervention” in “school readiness” and “social-emotional developmental indicators.” A farm family may be subject to “intervention” in order to “prevent child injuries.” The sky is the limit.
Although the Obama administration would claim the provision applies only to Medicaid families, the new statute, by its own definition, has no such limitation. Intervention may be with any family for any reason. It may also result in the child or children being required to go to certain schools or taking certain medications and vaccines and even having more limited – or no – interaction with parents. The federal government will now set the standards for raising children and will enforce them by home visits.”
Part of the program will require massive data collecting of private information including all sources of income and the amount gathered from each source.
A manual called Child Neglect: A Guide for Prevention, Assessment, and Intervention includes firearms as potential safety hazard and will require inspectors to verify safety compliance and record each inspection into a database.
Last session South Carolina Rep. Bill Chumley introduced a bill, H.3101 that would nullify certain provisions of Obamacare. The bill would give the state attorney general the authority to authorize law enforcement to arrest federal agents for trespassing. It would make forced home inspections under Obamacare illegal in South Carolina. It passed in the House but died in the senate.
Kent Brown and Rep. Rick Quinn discuss “forced” home inspections under Obamacare in the video below.
Yes indeed. I saw this article and pinged out the homeschool list already, but thank you for alerting me to it. I don’t always see things so appreciate it.
I have CarePlus it is a subsidery of Humana.Yesterday I received a letter from them stating that I would be getting a home visit from a visiting nurse. That the nurse would assist me with improving my health care. Some of the services included diabetes testing, blood pressure checking. I do not need request nor want their help. This was from memory. The letter is in my truck outside. Tomorrow I will go get it and do a better job describing the contents that I am doing now.
Send them back a letter and tell them NO.
Good idea.
“I suspect a lot of Rural Shovel and Shut up to come, but what do you do about their car they drove in on?”
One word: “backhoe.”
ping for later
Come and get it NSA.
That's what the people of Carthage said about the Romans...
Well, nobody lives forever, do they>
Thanks for the ping; post; thread. Noted.
Here I felt like I over-reacted the day after, seems this trend is picking up steam now. Young Miguel wasn't up to much good, that much I know from experience.
“o Emphasis 5: Outreach to high-risk and hard-to-engage populations”
I don’t think they have really thought about the “Hard to engage” population as I see it!!
Easy to see where this is going.
Post on FB.
Include Brietbart in your news links.
Look often at the BLAZE.
Guns in the house?
Children?
Psychiatric care definitely required!
Why-ever do you think that such a thing could happen?
BIG mistake at my house....
I’m going into my shop tomorrow and making a new sign for my front gate.
*chuckle* Have fun.
I don’t think they have really thought about the “Hard to engage” population as I see it!
Wow. Thanks for pointing that one out. I completely missed it.
"Hard to engage populations", eh? I think we know who they're talking about. Knowing this regime, we can pretty well surmise what they mean by "outreach".
I think a lot of these contractors are going to 'reach out' and pull back a stump.
But he might have been EMBARRASSED!!!!!! DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS???????
It means that one man placed himself and his family over the entire country of 300 million people.
I only hope there is a special place in hell reserved for those SO selfish.
Hello Randy Weaver.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.