No problemo - obozo has his boy Roberts in there to keep things straight ....
1. Liberal lawyers would line up ten deep to argue that he was fairly elected and the constitution means nothing...
2. He has pigmentation immunity, no one in congress would DARE try to start the ball rolling to remove him.
So. The Supremes will hear arguments? 4 years too late but whatever.
And I’ll believe this when I see it. And if this does go to the Supreme Court - look for Roberts to lead the way in tossing out any evidence against B. Hussein.
FAT CHANCE of this getting anything but a few laughs, and cat calls for us birthers to be ridiculed.
Personally, I am convinced that the story of Obozo’s immaculation is as bogus as a three dollar bill.
We are witnessing the death of America.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2009/09/109363/#HdpOPtiZpsD8eFV3.99
Wish-it-were-found-true-but-not-holding-my-breath bump.
This story is not so accurate. They scheduled a conference. That is not the same as saying that they are going to hear the case.
KABUKI THEATER
An explanation of what is really happening provided by Lurking Libertarian from a previous thread...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2977027/posts?page=95#95
Bottom line...this, like all the others, will be dismissed.
Start the popcorn!
I’m going to hold to that tiny spark of hope.
First, Roberts OWES the country one, and he knows it. Everybody thought he was a conservative, then he screwed us all with that “tax” argument. He’s been stung by all the vicious criticism, if he’s even partially human.
Second, anybody with ears has heard the grumblings from the electorate that something just ain’t right. From the non-existent paper birth certificate to the questionable Social Security number to the shaky Selective Service form to the passport used to visit Pakistan to the unanswered questions about Indonesian citizenship and the lack of naturalization papers ... yeah, there might be a few questionable documents worth a look.
Will this go anywhere? Doubtful. But I’ll hold out for human decency, anyway.
Interesting. Thanks to all posters. POSOTUS - USSC - CONgress...in case you haven’t noticed, we are being triangulated by totalitarians - PLUNDERING us while at the same time FORCING their mandates on us and arrogantly laughing at us as totalitarians do. Representation? ZERO.
FUBO
FUJR
Many cover ups, lies, illegal dealings, back door shenanigans, and deceptions. Most traces have been swept clean. It is frightening that this can happen.
I admire the determination of Orly Taitz. I am pessimistic about anything coming of this case. It seems that the truth is so unbelievable, that it is just not believed. Also, nothing sticks with this Obama. He is similar to Clinton in that way. No Republican could last a minute with any of this over his or her head.
I know at lot of freepers don’t care much for Orly Taitz but to be honest she is the most patriotic person I have ever seen. She loses and loses and loses cases to corrupt liberal justices and she never quits. She just bounces back and keeps fighting for justice. Her efforts make me feel ashamed that I haven’t done more in defense of my country and Constitution. She is not a dumb bimbo as some have called her. She is very intelligent and has a fiery drive to stand up for the rights guaranteed by our Constitution. She has seen Communism and lived under it. That is why she is so driven and determined to give everything she has to fight it.
I’m not a lawyer, but what I’ve always heard is the lower courts look at evidence and higher courts look at procedure. They won’t care what the evidence shows, they want to know if the hearing was by the book. Most people don’t seem to have standing and the case was dismissed. If they have standing according to the high court, maybe they can get a hearing for the evidence.
Roberts, nuff sed
Horse pooh,
The supremes are afraid of this magic negro and will do NOTHING to stop his dismantaling of America/
Other issues, such as actual birth location, passport history, college funding and sexuality are generally just speculation. If WND were to stick simply with items 1 to 4 and downplay the speculation, in my opinion, they would have significantly more credibility. Even mentioning the speculative items is what gives fodder to the "crazy birther" charges.