Posted on 06/26/2011 12:57:41 PM PDT by steadcom
I took the exact pdf from the White House website and opened it in Photoshop. I then took a copy of the "Obama" name on one line and put it over the "Obama" in another line. The "B"s match exactly !! This is a statistical impossibility unless the document is a fake. No typewritter from 1961 will produce the exact letter on the pixel level.... The person who made the fake document forgot to make a different "B" on the pixel level. If you don't believe it, try it yourself in Photoshop.
I think the BC has been proven on many different levels to be fake.
We used to use STEEL LETTERS to type ~ and they could do an incredibly fine job.
Typical electric typewriters back in the primitive early 1960s could produce letters to stand the ages. Manual typewriters in the hands of someone who knew what she was doing could do as well, but usually didn't because by then manuals were not being produced ~ just repaired ~ and wobbled around a bit from time to time and could be deflected from a perfect strike by an itch on your forearm.
It’s not just a question of the letters matching each other on the page. It’s a question of the letters being photocopied exactly alike, so the pixels are aligned. That doesn’t depend on the typewriter alone. It means that someone has been moving stuff around within some computer program.
good job. i haven’t seen that one mentioned before.
but there are a lot more with identical pixels.
(you are correct, it’s impossible.)
and there is even a clear reason for the identical boxes by the forger a few pages down here, after:
“Two lines into the record I noticed that side-by-side, two blank ‘check boxes’ were also composed of identical pixels despite the fact that the ‘check boxes’ were originally hand-drawn when the blank form was created.”
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/irrefutable-proof-obamas-new-birth.html
and there are many simple easy ones to show people:
ml/nj found a simple clear example, that anyone can do, even a non-techie:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2720608/posts?page=23#23
here’s another simple clear photo of evidence of fraud:
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=186343
Bluecat6 pointed out, that the very purpose of security paper, is to reveal fraud. and it does. (sorry, no link.)
and a few other quick ones:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/irrefutable-proof-obamas-new-birth.html
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/comparative-analysis-by-pro-graphics.html
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/13/research-summary-on-hawaii-birth-certificate-number-151-1961-010641/
...and of course, there is the Connecticut SSN, which needs no analysis, since it is clearly fradulent by definition, since he never lived in CT, it would be impossible to get.
and NO document expert has stood up and defended the LFBC.
but, CIA agents have said it is a fake:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2734826/posts
FN Contributor Maj Gen Vallely: Ret CIA Agents Look At Obama’s Birth Certificate, Say it’s a Fraud
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2735288/posts
Ex-CIA: ‘Forged document’ released as birth certificate
and much more, if you look for posts by Butterdezillion, Hotlanta Mike, ml/nj, and Satindoll.
Red Steel, Bluecat6, and Robinmasters, are also great sources of serious, well researched information.
“We used to use”
You obviously don’t have the experience to understand what pixel to pixel exact match means. It occurs ALL OVER the document.
And it is NOT normal. I have been dealing with digital documents for a very long time. This is a digitally-created document.
Typewriter companies were introducing new fully manual, non-electric models throughout the 1960's and continued manufacturing fully manual machines well into the 1970's, perhaps even later.
Somehow that is very similar to a sexist pig remark...teehee...
Considering everything else that has come from this fraud, I shouldn’t have expected more in the way of his fake BC. The bum can’t do anything very well. The second BC is a bigger joke than the first one.
It’s the REVERSE of a sexist pig remark ~ giving praise where praise is due eh!
Even a "carbon copy" made with carbon paper would be affected by this because pressure for transferring the carbon would vary slightly with the ribbon threads. You can see this in old carbon copies made on typewriters with cloth ribbons. You get a bit of the ribbon fabric impression even in the carbon copies, plus some effects from the fiber of the first layer of paper.
Finally, unless the mechanisms of the typewriter were absolutely perfect, and the scanner was set to an exact division of both the vertical spacing and horizontal spacing, there would be some difference in the way the scanner handled the edges and "antialiasing" of the same letter from the same type element on the same page. For example, at 100dpi, 200dpi, 400dpi, most typewriters have spacing which would make the same letter on different lines or in different horizontal positions on the same line scan differently. If there's any wear in the typewriter mechanism(s), even scanning at something that was an exact match for vertical and horizonal spacing (possibly 150dpi, 300dpi or 600dpi) would show anamolies from spacing variations from the wear.
I haven't repeated the experiment in the youtube video. However, identical pixels on the scan in two different positions on the paper would be very suspicious. It's difficult to explain other than digital modifications (copying) after the scan.
Cicero, Ignore muawiyah
He shows up at all the BC threads immediately to discredit speculation about wheter it is fake or not
he always has a ‘fact filled’ answer that is alwasy plausible-sounding and always 100% wrong
Dont try to talk sense the him it is useless
Hey don’t bother us conservatives, republicans or whatever we are with matters of “right and wrong” when there’s an election to win. lol.
and even if a steel typewriter, can make identical pixel perfect characters,
it CAN’T explain multiple places on the document ITSELF have identical pixel perfect characters on boxes that were originally hand-drawn.
not to mention the many other things, like words that curve next to words that don’t curve, signatures that have DIFFERENT resolutions, etc.
CIA agents have said it’s a fake. some experts with years of experience, have signed affidavits that it’s a fake.
... i’d like to see ONE, just ONE credentialed expert sign an affidavit saying it’s not.
Are you a moose limb too?
Sandra Lines said it best in her analysis of the work done by Pollard on the COLB. Paraphrasing - to determine the authenticity of a document you need - THE ACTUAL DOCUMENT. Since neither of the actual certified copies from the state of Hawaii of the actual 'short form' COLB or the actual LFBC have been made available no credible document expert will put their name on blessing these digital creations or digital photos of reprinted documented. It is just not what forensic specialist do. They look at actual documents.
This is why many of the security features in most states have hard to copy features embedded in them that make the features hard to scan, copy etc. Most states use an embossed seal vs. the very poor de-embossed 'raised seal' Hawaii uses. Embossed seals, by design, do not scan well. I have scanned numerous embossed BCs. The embossing is barely noticeable, even at high resolution, and never do you get a clean logo - by design.
Watermarks are put onto documents to avoid scanning or copying of the watermark. Do the Hawaii documents have watermarks? No. Do they have micro-print? No. Do they have anti-copying backgrounds that clearly say 'COPY' when run through a copy machine? No (but they used to!).
Many will say that because of the lack of the actual document you can not prove fraud. This is using the same logic as confirming an actual document only in reverse. But that is not the case. Fraud can and has been proven time again. On the COLB and for the LFBC. The images are criminal fraud. Criminal by someone in the White House and likely criminal by individuals in Hawaii.
Every expert agrees that the document is a fake. Hannity, Rush, BOR are too afraid of being called names to expose it.
As are every senator, congressman, judge and secretary of state. The bloodless coup has been achieved and the USA is well on the way to becoming a Marxist paradise. 2012 may be the last chance...maybe.
The BC issue is over and done with. Trump did exactly what he agreed to do.
Not to be a conspiracy nut, but I believe the Obama Regime put pressure on Trump to roll over on the BC issue. Maybe he was in on the fake BC scam from the beginning. With the level of treachery of the Obama Regime, they could have blackmailed Trump with dirt they had on him to get him play along with their scam.
The next I expect from Trump is a Ross Perot type candidacy as an independent to split the Republican vote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.