Posted on 04/02/2011 3:13:05 PM PDT by Creme Brulee
A new investigation of Obamas birth announcements appearing in Hawaiis two primary newspapers in August, 1961 shows, conclusively, they were the result of a registration record taken by the municipal health authority, not a medically verified Live" birth documented as occurring at a Hawaiian hospital, per an officially defined "vital event" by the U.S. Department of Health, National Vital Statistics Division protocols.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailypen.blogspot.com ...
Long overdue.
Again your theory could be right.
Go to http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/08/22/confirmed-stanley-ann-dunham-began-studies-in-september-1961-not-august/ and see:
Grade record from Stanley Ann Dunham Obama’s fall 1961 and spring 1962 semesters at the University of Washington
Detail from a registration form for Stanley Ann Dunham Obama for the University of Washington for the spring semester, 1962
Then who were you calling a blog pimp in your reply to me?
I said I wasn't clicking on a scummy blog to read some crap that could have been posted right here.
How do you know it's scummy if you've not read it?
I don't post entire blog articles out of respect to authors. They put forth a lot of effort to write their articles. Is it too much trouble to click a link and give them a few hits? It's a free article - they aren't charging you to read. How about showing them some appreciation by reading it from there?
same way my American born great nephew’s Itallian grandfather registered him in Italy so he would have dual citizenship.
I did the same with my grandchildren - even though they were not born in my town or my state.
The newspapers will publish the announcements for local RELATIVES of said child's birth or indeed, of a relatives death. They do not verify any data with authorities.
When my father died in Michigan, I had his death announcement printed in my - at the time - hometown paper in Massachusetts.
It's simply a service of newspapers for local people to announce births, marriages and deaths of their family members, regardless of the place of such events.
so ‘bummer has a ‘certification of live birth’ certifying nothing more that the fact that he was born. It doesn't verify where.
I think we can all agree he was probably born, although one could wonder it were the result of an incubus coupling.
All Birthers need to understand that everyone in government office, including the USSC is totally corrupt. They all understand what has happened and know what will happen if this ever is proven.
In 2008 the United States was subjected to a Coup d’eta, our Constitutional Republic was completely overthrown, now they are just adding the finishing touches.
We could survive that far better than 'bummerCare, the Socialist take over of private co operations and the reestablishment of the Caliphate - doncha think?
Back in 40s ,50s, and 60s, family members like grandparents placed notices about their family events like births, deaths, and weddings so local friends were notified of goings on of their kids ( like their daughter).
He didn’t deny his Kenyan birth when he was running for Senate in Illinois. He can’t have it both ways. (Well, maybe HE can because we are all racists if we use common sense.)
Show me where he says he was born in Kenya. Thank you.
It was reported in newspaper articles at the time. I will look for a link.
BOR is an egomaniac who thinks he knows everything and is blind to what he doesn’t know, IMO!
Thanks, looking forward to it.
Noble energy spent pursuing an irrelevent premise. A brith announcement could not, under any circumstances, indicate “Natural Born” status. At best, a foreign birth announcement could confirm Obama’s lack of natural born Citizenship, which, for any who will read any of ten or so supreme court cases, or 14th Amendment John Bingham’s testimony to the House in 1866, or the 2008 Senate Res 511 Hearings, which all specify that a natural born Citizen must have two citizen parents. Because most seem incapable of reading beyond the tabloids, the birth certificate, which will never appear, is clearly intended to occupy the media until the 2012 elections. Sadly, we appear not to have an electorate with the literacy to read our determinative documents. If we can't read our Constitution, how can we expect it to protect our freedoms?
At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens
Chief Justice Morrison Waite, Minor v. Happersett, 1874
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.