Skip to comments.
“If you try to take our firearms, we will kill you.”
coachisright.com ^
| RCH 4TH, 2011
| Doug Book, staff writer
Posted on 03/04/2011 7:33:59 AM PST by jmaroneps37
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Sounds clear enough to me.
To: jmaroneps37
Such talk is so uncivil....it’s about time!
2
posted on
03/04/2011 7:38:44 AM PST
by
stansblugrassgrl
(PRAISE THE LORD AND PASS THE AMMUNITION!!! YEEEEEHAW!)
To: jmaroneps37
On NPR the other day, some host danced around this question, gingerly approaching the "rumor" that ATF may have "somehow" supplied guns to drug gangs.
The guest on the show breezily dismissed such talk. It was a sting operation. Police have done such things for decades. A few items are given to bad guys to show good faith, and the end result is that lots of bad guys get arrested, and entire criminal operations are busted wide open. Happens all the time. Nothing to see here. Move along.
The host responded with so much relief it was palpable.
This is really bad stuff, and they are desperate to sweep this under the rug.
To: jmaroneps37
And when asked by the fellow for a short answer summing up his views, Vanderboegh simply answered, If you try to take our firearms, we will kill you. It boils down to that, he continues. If you try to take our firearms (liberty, property, insert any other God-given, inalienable right) we will kill you.This needs to be said often and loud, in the presence of others. It needs to be stated in a non-passionate, matter-of-fact manner, but stated nonetheless and those who hear it must know that we are serious. It is long past time for civil conversation.
4
posted on
03/04/2011 7:46:16 AM PST
by
ronnyquest
(Barack H. Obama is the Manchurian Candidate. What are you going to do about it?)
To: jmaroneps37
I'm on board with this...
5
posted on
03/04/2011 7:46:30 AM PST
by
Niteranger68
(Jared Lee Loughner - Disciple of Michael Moore)
To: jmaroneps37
And yet what happened after Katrina? Citizens willingly handed them over.
6
posted on
03/04/2011 7:47:47 AM PST
by
ponygirl
To: ponygirl
Lesson learned, in the open for all to see.
7
posted on
03/04/2011 7:50:29 AM PST
by
MileHi
( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
To: ClearCase_guy
Vanderboegh simply answered, If you try to take our firearms, we will kill you. I won't put it in the plural. "If you try to take my weapons, I will kill you. Then I will find whomever it was that sent you, and kill them. I will continue this course of action until I reach the end of your food chain, or I am dead."
L
8
posted on
03/04/2011 7:51:28 AM PST
by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
To: ClearCase_guy
On NPR the other day... This kind of crap underscores the need to defund NPR and let them compete in the marketplace.
9
posted on
03/04/2011 7:54:16 AM PST
by
grobdriver
(Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
To: Lurker
What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive?.... The [Security] Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers ... and, notwithstanding all of Stalins thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! Alexandr Solzhenitsyn
To: jmaroneps37
If you try to take our firearms, we will kill you. That phrase is really catchy.
11
posted on
03/04/2011 7:58:25 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Babies are only defenseless if you won't defend them.)
To: ponygirl
12
posted on
03/04/2011 7:58:39 AM PST
by
WayneS
(Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
To: jmaroneps37
You want my means of self-defense? Okay. Ammo first.
13
posted on
03/04/2011 7:59:47 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(You want my means of self-defense? Okay. Ammo first.)
To: jmaroneps37
14
posted on
03/04/2011 8:02:41 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(You want my means of self-defense? Okay. Ammo first.)
To: jmaroneps37
I get the same reaction while explaining that hunting isn't the reason for the Second Amendment. The nervous look you get when explaining a "Well regulated Militia" is the "Whole of the people" and it is to defend the Constitution from enemies, "Both foreign and Domestic" is really something when you put emphasis on "Domestic". Sometimes I will drag out the 3 syllables in "domestic" into 3 separate words. Also a little history lesson explaining you have "NO" Amendments without the Second Amendment will open some eyes. The government is the problem, not the guarantee of your rights. The Bill Of Rights were written to LIMIT the government, not your fellow citizen.
I usually ask them if they are willing to give up any of the other 9 Amendments if I give up the Second? Ask if they want to join the "state" church, or be arrested for speaking ill of the President. A good one is always to ask which soldiers they want to live in the spare room at home.
I think it's time to just state bluntly that you will die trying to confiscate guns. Do you really want to push the issue? You would probably get a lesser reaction forcing everyone to a state religion than taking up 300 million guns.
15
posted on
03/04/2011 8:04:19 AM PST
by
chuckles
To: EternalVigilance
To: Lurker
Amen.
However, I feel sorry for all of the good folks in law enforcement who would get caught up in such a conflagration. "Just following orders" won't cut it...
No remorse or pity though. If you lie down with dogs, don't be surprised when you arise with fleas.
17
posted on
03/04/2011 8:06:21 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(III%. The last line in the sand)
To: jmaroneps37
Liberals are like children. They want what they want and words and logic roll off their backs.
18
posted on
03/04/2011 8:10:13 AM PST
by
Let's Roll
(Save the world's best healthcare - REPEAL, DEFUND Obamacare!)
To: Let's Roll
You owe children an apology. They can usually be reasoned with.
19
posted on
03/04/2011 8:16:57 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(You want my means of self-defense? Okay. Ammo first.)
To: ronnyquest
Actually, the guy hit upon the REASON they want to take the guns from private citizens.
The gun-controllers WANT to be able to take life, liberty, etc., from us at will, and don’t want risk being shot when they do it.
20
posted on
03/04/2011 8:17:27 AM PST
by
Little Ray
(The Gods of the Copybook Heading, with terror and slaughter return!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson