Posted on 12/16/2010 7:17:51 PM PST by Bigtigermike
Sarah Palin never apologizes for what some attribute to her as weaknesses. Krauthammer recently criticized her as not looking very presidential because of her shows and books. But she makes it clear that she brings a different game than what some are accustomed to, and win or lose that’s what she’s going to stick with. She’s going rogue!
It’s a great interview all the way through. Enjoy!
(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...
No there isn't. And that's a good thing. It means we're starting to learn.
The right is just now starting to demand the consistency, and refusal to compromise that the left has been demanding for 90 years. It took long enough.
Although I don't think all the blame belongs with us. The entire mass media of the country was totally against us for most of that 90 years. And that's a mighty difficult hurdle to overcome.
Now we finally have the internet to bypass the gatekeepers.
She shouldn’t have even responded to that low piece of crap!
Wouldn't it be at least prudent to let the ink dry on a few vetoes first?
Go to hell!!!
Uh, maybe it’s just me, but she wasn’t responding to Kraut. She was responding to O’Reilly’s assertion that ‘some’ think it doesn’t lift Palin up to be pal’in around on TV with Kate plus 8.
Kraut never mentioned Kate.
Her response to O’Reilly’s question about Kraut was an awkward defense of her show that she apparently thinks fulfills a promise to Alaskans to promote the state.
Same here. At first, I thought she must be a Wisconsin native who moved to Alaska. She sure sounded like one. I'll bet she sounds like a hometown girl to the Wisconsinites.
BO...Just give me a knife!
After two days in Alaska he’d open both wrists!
ROFL!! Post of the day
Name another politician who has been the subject of this kind of insane, phlegm-flecked RAGE from all sides, even after leaving office midway through their first term in statewide office.
And one whose children and grand-children have become political targets, including R-rated character assassination on national TV shows.
You reveal your own lack of reflection (at best) in making your assertions.
She didn’t smack kraut, since that question wasn’t from him. Did Kraut mention Kate Plus 8? No. Did O’reilly say Kraut mentioned Kate Plus 8? No. Just more imagining things from the usual suspects.
You want dried ink? Read up on Sarah's record of service in Alaska.
Besides, no politician will ever get the chance to veto anything, unless they get the enthusiastic support of millions of their fellow citizens.
You're gonna make me say it, aren't you?
Do tell. What other thread? Curious minds, and all that...
screw pro-abort, pro-gun control Krauthammer who is basically only conservative about taxes and something else that we all know but never acknowledge so as not to be rude
Yea, Bush completely erased his southern accent or he never would have been elected. Clinton too.
And of course JFK, he cleaned up his Boston accent too, just in time to get elected.
And old Teddy K, he couldn't say idea without putting an "r" at the end of it.
Ruined his career.
I get a kick out of all the people that want Palin to sound all smooth and slick like Obama, Romney, Gingrich, Pelosi, Reid and all the other elite pols out there.
Yea that's what we need, more of the same.
She cleaned O'Reilly's clock tonight. It was great to see her get her points across while ol' BO sputtered aroud UNDER her voice.
Consider some of the recent posting history:
And Reagan signed a lot of liberal legislation that people right here on Free Republic try to excuse away.
And we also need to be skeptical of any and all politicians, including Sarah Palin. Remember when George Bush II was going to be the conservative savior?
Don't build up cults of personality around these people. When they do something good say "eh, you could've done better".
Politicians are narcissists. They crave to be liked. As soon as they are sure one group will like them no matter what, they start scheming to bring other groups in to like them. Same today as it was in Athens.
Well, that's certainly one of the more popular Conservative readings of the situation. But I have a slightly different one. Where is the UN headquartered? Where did Trotsky spend the winter of 1917? What have we seen over and over in the Wikileaks wires? Where did Soros set up shop?
Neither did Engels. You seem to have a distorted view of the history of liberal theory that's all wrapped up in some tidy, unsophisticated, libertarian view of "governmental vs non-governmental". Let's try to bring it up past the level of a National Review Online Corner blurb, shall we?
(underlined text below)
Not saying this newb is a troll.....just saying that many of my lib friends use the term “reactionary” instead of “conservative” (as a pejorative) ; and I don’t know one conservative that does so.
I wear the label with pride. Who wouldn't react vociferously to leftism?
Cheers!
Uh, what does me being bored with your Hunter fantasies have to do with the factual observation I just made about the title of this thread not matching reality?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.