Chicago Law Prof on Obama: “The Professors Hated Him because he was Lazy, Unqualified"

GatewayPundit ^ | 03-31-10 | Jim Hoft

[KJC1]

The highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law spoke out on Barack Obama saying, “Professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings.” Doug Ross reported this and more:

I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about “Barry.” Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn’t even considered. A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn’t have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.

The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).

[Madame Dufarge]

You're most welcome.

Thanks for starting the thread.

[wiggen]

It was long but very interesting.

[Lancey Howard]

BUMP!

[rbg81]

some students complained about because he never taught Constitutional law which he was supposed to be doing but discussed sports

---

Good point. The picture in the article shows him teaching “Power Analysis”. How (exactly) does that relate to Constitutional Law? Methinks he was deoonstructing the Constitution rather than teaching it. Would be surprised if Barry has even read the Constitution.

[KJC1]

Very good (and true) points, but that one Harvard Law Review lady expressly said she didn’t speak out during the campaign because she thought it might not be “fair.” However, maybe others did and no one listened and reported it.

[okie01]

...she didn’t speak out during the campaign because she thought it might not be “fair.

Noticed that. It's an odd notion of "fair" don't you think?

It's probably born of political correctness coupled with affirmative action. It simply wouldn't have been "fair" to tell the truth about a black man...

[Stosh]

With what he’s doing to the country, he’s scaring me shiftless.

[Always A Marine]

I tell everyone that Sarah Palin has published exactly as many law review articles as the Kenyan.

Ding! Ding! Ding! You have the winning post -- and a pithy slogan for 2012...

[opentalk]

bump,

[RatsDawg]

I thought Bill Ayers wrote his Autobiography? Maybe Obama just spent time proof reading it. lol

[opentalk]

From steady drip link , and atlas shrugs, Communications Corruption at the White House :

Breaking developement--just as these disturbing facts come to light about Barack Obama, the White House is busy making deals with numerous 'journalists,' promising unprecedented access to the President in exchange for refraining from reporting certain information 'they may discover.'

[newfreep]

"According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement)."

[firebasecody]

I have seen the result of AA hires and promotions. You end up with idiots who aren’t even aware that they have no talent. Appearance is everything. Substance, well, you rarely find it. Empty suits with a ‘position’ where no work ever gets done. Dangerous folks in positions of authority.

[True Republican Patriot]

Thank you! It would be Wonderful to document those Students who experienced the Fraudmeister ripping them off by Bullsh*ting about sports when he was suppose to be Lecturing them on Constitutional Law! The Idiot really is a Dumb CON-ARTIST who was bribed into the Office of POTUS by Enemies of AMERICA! Bets are that even SOROS is a frontman for the Real MOBSTERS and TERRORISTS!
This is NOT GOOD! When OBOZO’S Candidate Lost the Election in KENYA, Major RIOTS Racked the Country tearing it apart, UNTIL OBOZO’S Chosen One was Given the “CO-PRESIDENCY!

[cblue55]

some one has been pulling the strings behind him for years

and still is

is it Soros?

who writes his speeches? who wrote the health care bill?

---

The SEIU

[blam]

"Now most of the country hates him because he’s lazy and unqualified."

He's Black...that's all that matters.

Asking or expecting anything more would probably be called racist.

We've dumbed down everything else, why not the presidency?

[PhiKapMom]

I don’t think he could teach Constitutional Law if he had to because I don’t think Obama considers our Constitutional worth anything. He is more of the ‘social justice’ types.

[PhiKapMom]

Very odd notion of ‘fair’ — PC needs to go the same way as Social Justice — into File 13 never to be heard again.

[PhiKapMom]

The MSM didn’t want the facts on Obama and a lot of them still don’t, but a thread like this with facts is going to be read by people we don’t even know.

Thanks for finding this and starting this thread.

[rodguy911]

Wow great stuff didn't know a lot of that,thanks.

Soros is very capable of pulling of the entire con but according to other stuff I have read it may be much wider, broader and have started many years before.