Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Since They Can't Get Your Firearms Yet, They Have Gone After Your Ammunition
secondamendmentfreedom.blogspot.com ^ | 10/15/09 | Sasparilla

Posted on 10/14/2009 8:35:49 AM PDT by Sasparilla

Its been predicted for a long time that if anti- gun groups can't get your guns, then they will go after your ammunition.

Governor Arnold Swartzenegger has done exactly that in signing a new law regulating ammunition sales. The ostensible goal is to track the bullets used in crimes.

Criminals will find another way to get their bullets. It will be where they get their guns...on the street. This is another gun law that will only affect the honest individual.

The Governor said just the week before that he would veto the new ammunition law, thus preventing organized opposition to his signature. Anyone violating this new law will face a misdemeanor charge.

The new law makes these changes in the way you will buy ammunition in California.

1) It will prohibit the sale of ammunition in a way that allows the ammunition to be accessible without the assistance of an employee. It has to be in a case where the customer has no access. You could have to stand in line to see what you are buying..

2) The dealer must ask for identification each time you buy handgun ammunition and the dealer will be required to record personal information including:

a. Your thumb print

b. Your Driver's license number

c. Your home address and telephone number

d. The brand and type of ammunition that you purchased

e. Your birth date

3) It will now become illegal to buy ammunition online or by mail order. It may become impossible to buy any ammunition not stocked by dealers.

In addition to crippling taxes, crime, and draconian gun laws, this is one more reason for Californians to move to gun friendlier Nevada or Arizona.

Governor Swartzenegger said in signing the bill, "Although I have previously vetoed legislation similar to this...

(Excerpt) Read more at secondamendmentfreedom.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: agenda; ammo; ammocontrol; banglist; bhobanglist; guncontrol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 10/14/2009 8:35:49 AM PDT by Sasparilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

We should push ammunition manufacturers to stop all ammunition sales to California. Particularly CA law enforcement. Let them throw rocks.


2 posted on 10/14/2009 8:37:17 AM PDT by Favor Center (Targets up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center

It was good enough for Barrett to Stop California law enforcement sales. Ammo manufacturers...take note


3 posted on 10/14/2009 8:39:23 AM PDT by Sasparilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center

WOW. They’ll have to go to neighboring states to get ammo.Incoming revenue for the neighboring states.None for CA.
Way to go Ahnold!


4 posted on 10/14/2009 8:40:19 AM PDT by gimme1ibertee (And the people cry "Sarah!Sarah!" And she hears....yes,she hears......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

I will sell ammo to them, 10% markup.


5 posted on 10/14/2009 8:44:34 AM PDT by devistate one four (Back by popular demand: America love or leave it (GTFOOMC) TET68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

“We’re going to have to take one step at a time,
and the first step is necessarily — given the
political realities — going to be very modest .
.. So then we’ll have to start working again to
strengthen the law, and then again to strengthen
the next law, and maybe again and again.
Right now, though, we’d be satisfied not with half
a loaf but with a slice.
Our ultimate goal — total control of handguns in
the United States — is going to take time ....
The first problem is to slow down the increasing
number of guns being produced and sold in this country.
The second problem is to get handguns registered.
And the final problem is to make the possession of *all*
handguns and *all* handgun ammunition — except for the
military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed
sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors — totally
illegal.”
— Pete Shields, Chairman Emeritus, Handgun Control, Inc.
( “The New Yorker”, July 26, 1976 )


6 posted on 10/14/2009 8:45:23 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunham?) Change America Will Die From.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

The SC Heller decision seems to apply to a ‘quantity of ammunition’ as well as the firearms. I believe the SC already thought of government banning ammunition, and made that part of the right. You cannot separate the firearm from the ammunition.

I haven’t reread the Heller decision lately but I seem to recall this was the case.


7 posted on 10/14/2009 8:46:24 AM PDT by Tarpon (Oba-Mao is a reader, not a leader ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

Buy out of state.. don’t spend nothing in California.

Buy a carbine rifle, the law covers handgun ammo... if you buy a rifle that uses the same ammo then buy it in bulk for your rifle.


8 posted on 10/14/2009 8:57:35 AM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla
Just bought a case of 440 rounds of 7.62x54r for my Mosin Nagant. Cost me 95 bucks from Cheaper than Dirt. No can opener, but a screwdriver and hammer, judiciously applied, worked fine.

I'm new to using rimfire ammo - just bought a .22LR (Remington 597). Is it common to get misfires? I have a box of 500 Remington Cyclone rounds and fired about 60 or so over the weekend with about a 10% misfire rate.

9 posted on 10/14/2009 8:57:47 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (The townhalls were going great until the oPods showed up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

Sounds like somewhing wrong with the firing pin not the ammo. I go through boxes of Remington without any misfires in my Ruger. Evenb the little Phoenix Arms pocket pistol doesn’t cause such a rate of misfires.


10 posted on 10/14/2009 9:01:20 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS
"I'm new to using rimfire ammo - just bought a .22LR (Remington 597). Is it common to get misfires? I have a box of 500 Remington Cyclone rounds and fired about 60 or so over the weekend with about a 10% misfire rate."

I've read quite a bit about quality control problems with Remington rimfire ammo in the past year or so. To answer your question, no, a quality firearm with good ammo should have nothing like a 10% misfire rate. Have you tried different ammo? I've generally had excellent results with CCI rimfire ammo...

11 posted on 10/14/2009 9:03:15 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla
Obama fuels gun purchases, Schwarzenegger fuels ammo sales........they just do not get it.
12 posted on 10/14/2009 9:09:11 AM PDT by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gimme1ibertee

Yep. I see a thriving black market in ammunition for those who do not trust the government. I imagine that for a while it will be impossible to find ammunition in towns that border California.


13 posted on 10/14/2009 9:09:44 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

The a**hat lied about vetoing the bill and then signed it into law. What a jerk.


14 posted on 10/14/2009 9:12:27 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MD_Willington_1976

Yes, cowboy action shooters are going to have a hard time competing with their .44 mag and .357 mag carbines. The only up side, so far, is that components aren’t banned so reloading is still an option. 50 rounds per month is BS. For a criminal, 50 rounds will last forever, however for a law abiding citizen who shoots in competition 50 rounds is a snap of the fingers.


15 posted on 10/14/2009 9:16:28 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Yep.True that.
Of course,if one were so inclined, one could have out-of-state relatives get one’s ammo for one online,and then one could simply go get it and bring it home,or they can ship it to one via UPS or FedEx,or by a westbound friend or relative....there’s always a way.


16 posted on 10/14/2009 9:18:07 AM PDT by gimme1ibertee (And the people cry "Sarah!Sarah!" And she hears....yes,she hears......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

We have until February, 2011 to stock up...


17 posted on 10/14/2009 9:21:39 AM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat Lead. Bonus tag line: FAIL 246, Obama 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS
Lately some Remington ammo has seem to misfire frequently, according to some reports I've read. .22 rimfires should not misfire any more than center fire, in fact traditionally they are quite reliable and Remington used to be one of the best. I use what ever is cheapest and have no trouble, in fact I have a bunch of Remington .22 long rifles now that are working just fine in my pistols and my rifle. Check the strike of your firing pin, maybe it is to light for the Remington brass, or maybe a bad lot of Ammo. You might try calling Remington and complaining about it.

If enough people crab they will fix whatever is causing it. .22 long rifle ammo is one of the biggest sellers of ammo and I am sure all ammo manufacturers make a good profit off of them and would not want to lose any sales because of misfires.

18 posted on 10/14/2009 9:22:21 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla
I hate to break it to the gun grabbers (or in this case ammo grabbers) but the 2nd amendment uses the term "arms" not "firearms".

The 18th century definition of "arms" refers to anything an individual might need to effectively defend themselves and their community. This included not only guns but ammo, knives, armor, swords and (in the case of wealthier Americans) cannons. I think it could be effectively argued that the 2nd amendment today protects the ownership of guns, probably even fully automatics, all ammo, body armor, and possibly even grenades / grenades launchers.

19 posted on 10/14/2009 9:27:39 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla
Indictment:

1 count of conspiring to deprive Americans of their Constitutional rights under the 2nd Amendment.

10 million counts of violating Americans' Constitutional rights under the 2nd Amendment.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

20 posted on 10/14/2009 9:30:57 AM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson