Posted on 09/10/2009 8:48:46 AM PDT by opentalk
To be a bonafide conspiracy, two or more individuals must knowingly conspire, plot or plan an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious act. In politics or law, an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act, is a “conspiracy.” Not in theory, but in reality.
Such is the case today!
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
FYI, canadafreepress.com must be excerpted. If a source must be excerpted, please don’t post the full content in the thread. This protects the site from copyright infringement issues.
"Please, allow me to connect the dots here…
• The DNC drafted, signed and notarized TWO slightly different versions of their Official Certification of Nomination documents, not one.This means:
• One of those documents had complete legal language, and one of them was missing the text concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama.
• The version which is absent any certification of constitutional standing for the office of President is the version that was filed with every state in the country, and the one used by the DNC to elect Barack Obama President."
THEY KNEW HE WAS INELIGIBLE FROM DAY ONE
They betrayed the constitution and deliberately lied to every voter.
(and a welcome to opentalk)...
can’t see if you pinged STARWISE
Maybe they didn’t know and were just covering their bases, “just in case.”
"Uhhhh, you know how we always fill out that form about the constitutional eligibility of our candidate? Well ... uhhh ... what do you think would happen if we ... uhhh ... just skipped that part. I mean, you know ... would that be a problem?"
nudging me for the past few days has been the question of the swearing in ceremony...what exactly happened there and is it of any moment other than an ominous bungling of protocol?
I’ve been saying all along that we should go after Pelosi, Reid and anyone else who vouched for his eligibility.
Nancy ain’t going to prison for anybody.
other Freepers also bringing up that subject lately
This article primarily concerns vetting Barack Obama for President which of course is important. But it is also about unlawful, surreptitious plotting of fraud by political and government sponsored agents.
Think about the surreptitious agreement for allowing illegal (illegal like in fraud) immigrants across the US boundary, essentially an invasion, fostered by The Council on Foreign Relations, ala GWB, John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Jay Rockefeller, and virtually all Democrat funded politicians down to the State level - essentially for vote farming. This is not a conspiracy when it violates the very laws of the United States, and is opposed by a significant majority of US taxpayers?
The United States federal government is now as corrupt as at any time in its history. For some perverted reason that is covered up by the mass media, which in itself is reduced to central control by a few bigoted pretenders.
The job of each and every legitimate taxpaying citizen in the United States is to isolate, expose, and reject the sinister among us. It's going to take a gut-wrenching and principled effort. Exposing Barack Obama is a good start, but we're talking only a front man for a deep psychological schism between the Left (the sinister) and the Right (the responsible).
Johnny Suntrade
The Suntrade Institute
This is a major find and has extremely serious implications. I won’t impugn the Canadafreepress (and kudos to them for breaking this story!), but I want to see the story verified by a second, independent source, before I get too animated about it!!
In the meantime, we need to get maximum pressure on the Dems to come clean if this story is true!! And, if it is, there won’t be enough tar, feathers and rails to run zero, Pelousy, et al, who perpetrated this fraud on America and the American people!! All any of us will be able to do is get out of the way of the millions of angry Americans.
I wonder if anyone has emailed Glen Beck or Rush with this article?
Does it actually make a difference, though, if they produce the correct version when someone inquires? Suppose they just say, “oops, just a boo-boo, here’s the version with the constitutional requirement in it.”
Woah, maybe this is what Beck has? This is mind boggling if true. We thought spicoli was nutz for ordering a pizza and having it sent to class but this? oh man this is way over top ...
there’s no signature on that form?
Filing with the 50 states a notarized version is tantamount to telling a lie before a judge in a court after being sworn in. Coming back to apologize and ‘resubmit’ is not even ont he same page as telling the lie to start with.
At least Pelosi was being honest in releasing the second document and not the first.
/Sarc
I think Beck is busy picking ACORNs.
You’re right.
But this should be Beck’s next story.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.