Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: opentalk

FYI, canadafreepress.com must be excerpted. If a source must be excerpted, please don’t post the full content in the thread. This protects the site from copyright infringement issues.


2 posted on 09/10/2009 8:59:43 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Admin Moderator; opentalk
A short quote:

"Please, allow me to connect the dots here…

• The DNC drafted, signed and notarized TWO slightly different versions of their Official Certification of Nomination documents, not one.
• One of those documents had complete legal language, and one of them was missing the text concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama.
• The version which is absent any certification of constitutional standing for the office of President is the version that was filed with every state in the country, and the one used by the DNC to elect Barack Obama President."
This means:

THEY KNEW HE WAS INELIGIBLE FROM DAY ONE

They betrayed the constitution and deliberately lied to every voter.

3 posted on 09/10/2009 9:11:20 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 232 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: All
I can just imagine the hemming and hawing as this sort of issue was discussed at the highest levels:

"Uhhhh, you know how we always fill out that form about the constitutional eligibility of our candidate? Well ... uhhh ... what do you think would happen if we ... uhhh ... just skipped that part. I mean, you know ... would that be a problem?"

7 posted on 09/10/2009 9:21:04 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Admin Moderator
To be a bonafide conspiracy, two or more individuals must knowingly conspire, plot or plan an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious act. In politics or law, an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act, is a “conspiracy.”

This article primarily concerns vetting Barack Obama for President which of course is important. But it is also about unlawful, surreptitious plotting of fraud by political and government sponsored agents.

Think about the surreptitious agreement for allowing illegal (illegal like in fraud) immigrants across the US boundary, essentially an invasion, fostered by The Council on Foreign Relations, ala GWB, John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Jay Rockefeller, and virtually all Democrat funded politicians down to the State level - essentially for vote farming. This is not a conspiracy when it violates the very laws of the United States, and is opposed by a significant majority of US taxpayers?

The United States federal government is now as corrupt as at any time in its history. For some perverted reason that is covered up by the mass media, which in itself is reduced to central control by a few bigoted pretenders.

The job of each and every legitimate taxpaying citizen in the United States is to isolate, expose, and reject the sinister among us. It's going to take a gut-wrenching and principled effort. Exposing Barack Obama is a good start, but we're talking only a front man for a deep psychological schism between the Left (the sinister) and the Right (the responsible).

Johnny Suntrade

The Suntrade Institute

11 posted on 09/10/2009 9:34:39 AM PDT by jnsun (The LEFT: The need to manipulate others because of nothing productive to offer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping


25 posted on 09/10/2009 10:04:01 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Admin Moderator
So, Pelosi and Obama are both guilty of fraud. Possibly also can prosecute some secretaries of state who accepted the incomplete document?

I pray that there are some good prosecutors out there. Subpoenas should be coming in thick and fast, if we have anybody with the courage to try to enforce the law.

29 posted on 09/10/2009 10:06:43 AM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk

This information, along with photos of the docs, was posted here on 9-2-09. The source was Anit-Mullah.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2330954/posts


34 posted on 09/10/2009 10:14:05 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk

Wow, what a post! A smoking gun may have been found!!!!


55 posted on 09/10/2009 11:34:23 AM PDT by balls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Admin Moderator

nice


84 posted on 09/10/2009 4:58:22 PM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Admin Moderator

WOW, I can’t wait for the movie to come out.
This is way better than all the “Who Killed Kennedy?” stuff.


88 posted on 09/10/2009 8:52:53 PM PDT by BuffaloJack (Obama's New New Deal = The Raw Deal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Admin Moderator

read later...


90 posted on 09/10/2009 9:16:01 PM PDT by OldBlondBabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: jbwilliams
This should be earth shaking in it's ramifications. The DNC needs to be prosecuted under RICO instead of running our government.

This story needs to get out to everyone but I suspect a "more important" story will take the headlines in the MSM - just like what happened every time it seemed Bill Clinton was on the ropes and going down for the count!

108 posted on 09/11/2009 12:36:19 PM PDT by Gritty (We are either going to stop Obama or the United States is going to cease to exist - Alan Keyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Admin Moderator

Here is a real eye-opener for ya!

There are now going to be lawsuits coming out about election fraud. It seems the DNC first signed their traditional form to certify a candidate but then signed another version.

The second version of the DNC’s certification for the offices of President and Vice President differed by only having one line deleted...

Guess which line was deleted?

The line saying that the candidates were “eligible under the Constitution” was deleted. And this is the version that they mailed to ALL 50 States.

Why would Nancy Pelosi and the DNC do this?

So for a story that wont die two very BIG new stories have come out in the past couple weeks:

Anti-Birthers can no longer claim that Obama is not fighting this case. He is now using DOJ lawyers at the taxpayers expense to fight this case.

Also now we know that the DNC sent a second version of the DNC Party “Official Certification of Nomination” which excluded signing off on any claim that Obama was Consitutionally elgible to be President.

The version of the document that the DNC mailed out to ALL 50 States was missing the following text, and I quote;

“- and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”

Why would they redo the document and remove this line?


111 posted on 09/14/2009 8:50:00 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

BTTT


115 posted on 09/16/2009 6:11:28 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson