Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hollister v. Soetoro: Judge Denies Specific Motions in Pending Case
The right side of Life ^ | 2/5/09 | Phil

Posted on 02/05/2009 2:45:47 PM PST by classical artist

The following Order from DC District Court Judge James Robertson was issued for Hollister v. Soetoro yesterday:

ORDER

Plaintiff’s motion to file interpleader and deposit funds with the court [#2] is frivolous and is denied. His motion to shorten time for defendants to respond to his complaint [#3] is moot and is denied. The motions of his counsel [#4, #5] for the admission pro hac vice of Philip J. Berg and Lawrence J. Joyce are in abeyance until the Court has had the opportunity, in open court, to examine their credentials, their competence, their good faith, and the factual and legal bases of the complaint they have signed. JAMES ROBERTSON United States District Judge

(Excerpt) Read more at therightsideoflife.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: barackobama; berg; bho2008; bho2009; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; citizenship; colb; constitution; coverup; democrats; democratscandals; eligibility; ineligible; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; obamatruthfile; soetoro; truthers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: Star Traveler

You know, you sure type a lot o’ characters to say so little.


41 posted on 02/06/2009 4:20:07 PM PST by mkjessup (You are either with our Constitution, or you are with TKU ("The Kenyan Usurper"). CHOOSE dammit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

If I said so little, there shouldn’t be anything to respond to... LOL...


42 posted on 02/06/2009 4:42:49 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

[ ]

Exactly.


43 posted on 02/06/2009 4:45:29 PM PST by mkjessup (You are either with our Constitution, or you are with TKU ("The Kenyan Usurper"). CHOOSE dammit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

But yet, you keep responding... amazing... LOL...


44 posted on 02/06/2009 4:49:30 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

It’s like mosquitos, they keep buzzing around, you keep swatting at them, eventually you end up smashin ‘em.


45 posted on 02/06/2009 5:04:13 PM PST by mkjessup (You are either with our Constitution, or you are with TKU ("The Kenyan Usurper"). CHOOSE dammit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

You appear to be intently and consistantly taking the Democrat position.

The bottomline is, the Constitution clearly states in Article 11, Section 1, that the President must be a natural born American citizen to serve as President. That’s enough to require Obama to cough up his original birth certificate and other documents.


46 posted on 02/06/2009 5:10:53 PM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Unless and until Comrade 0bama is compelled to produce the original vault copy of his birth certificate currently under seal by the Governor of Hawaii

Obama's BC has not been sealed by the Governor of Hawaii (a Republican). It's being treated like very other BC in Hawaii, in other words it can only be released to those entitled under law to receive it. In this case the "registrant", i.e Obama, has either chosen not to obtain his vault BC or to not reveal the one that already has already been released to him.

47 posted on 02/06/2009 5:12:03 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american

You said — “You appear to be intently and consistantly taking the Democrat position.”

And, as I’ve said all along, the truth does not come with Democrat or Republican labels. It’s simply the truth of the matter. The problem (and the truth of the matter) is that there is no legal requirement for Obama to prove anything more than prior candidates have been required to legally prove. That’s the truth of the matter. It’s not Democrat or Republican.

And then you said — “The bottomline is, the Constitution clearly states in Article 11, Section 1, that the President must be a natural born American citizen to serve as President. That’s enough to require Obama to cough up his original birth certificate and other documents.”

And there’s another “truth of the matter” in your statement.

The qualifications for President are clear. Obama (and his campaign and the party) have already signed legal documents saying he is qualified. That’s the legal end of it.

And, in your statement — “That’s enough to require Obama to cough up his original birth certificate and other documents.” — has already been shown to be wrong. If just the statement in the Constitution were *enough* to *require* Obama to do so — it would have been done by now. The fact that it was *not enough* is why it was not done.

And so, there’s the “truth to the matter”... as I’ve been saying all along. It’s not Democrat or Republican, but merely what is true.

That’s also the reason why I’ve said that this shows there is a big hole in the vetting process and that’s why state laws are needed to *require* the specific documentation (that you are talking about). Until that is done, it won’t be *required*....

Oklahoma and Arizona are working on that statute and process right now.


48 posted on 02/06/2009 5:19:51 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Are you still responding... :-)


49 posted on 02/06/2009 5:20:23 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american
Obama is not eligible to serve as President until he proves it!!

He appears to be defying you.

50 posted on 02/06/2009 5:24:01 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

What does the new news mean? (If you have a minute to write a sentence or two in simple laymans’ language.)


51 posted on 02/06/2009 5:25:37 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
why, among all of the Presidents of the United States of America, does Barack Hussein Obama stand alone in spending a small fortune and employing the services of many attorneys to keep the details of his birth secret and concealed from the public?"

Leo Donofrio came up with some very good evidence that Pres. Chester A. Arthur concealed details of his birth, in particular that his father was still a British citizen at that time.

Do you think for one minute that the lamestream media would have given ANY Republican President or President-elect a pass were they to engage in this kind of secretive behavior?

Arthur was a Republican.

52 posted on 02/06/2009 5:27:11 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: karibdes; little jeremiah
Post #4 is a good analysis.
53 posted on 02/06/2009 5:28:30 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Thank you, I’ll read it again more carefully!


54 posted on 02/06/2009 5:29:14 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Not if I was a Judge!


55 posted on 02/06/2009 5:42:14 PM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

On his Fight the Smears web site, Hussein has admitted that he was born a British and Kenyan subject through his father Barack Hussein Obama Sr. Since we know that Barack Obama is a prolifically inveterate liar, it is necessary to determine that Obama Sr. is in fact his actual father, since he may have been attempting to use the fact of an African father to establish some sort of romantic birth myth. (His birth certificate father may be a natural born citizen, but one whose origin is not as romantic as Obama Sr.) Once it is established legally (via the vault Birth Certificate) that Obama Sr. is in fact his father, he should be Article II, clause 5 disqualified on the basis that at birth he had an actionable claim of citizenship upon the British Empire, and therefore cannot possibly be a national born citizen, one prerequisite of which is undivided allegiance. Your NBC status is your citizenship status AT BIRTH, not when you decide to run for president.


56 posted on 02/06/2009 6:59:54 PM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: wideminded
Obama's BC has not been sealed by the Governor of Hawaii

Over 19,000 Google hits find stories stating exactly that, vs. a statement denying it by an unidentified aide in the Governor's office.

The fact remains, the original vault copy has not been produced, and considering that we're talking about the highest Office in the land, and the controversy about the unverified bonafides of the present Office holder, the bloody vault certificate needs to be made public.
58 posted on 02/06/2009 10:56:00 PM PST by mkjessup (You are either with our Constitution, or you are with TKU ("The Kenyan Usurper"). CHOOSE dammit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
Leo Donofrio came up with some very good evidence that Pres. Chester A. Arthur concealed details of his birth, in particular that his father was still a British citizen at that time.
Do you think for one minute that the lamestream media would have given ANY Republican President or President-elect a pass were they to engage in this kind of secretive behavior?

Arthur was a Republican.


OK Genius, now tell us what channel CNN was on back in 1866.

Ya nitwit.
59 posted on 02/06/2009 10:57:57 PM PST by mkjessup (You are either with our Constitution, or you are with TKU ("The Kenyan Usurper"). CHOOSE dammit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Do you think for one minute that the lamestream media would have given ANY Republican President or President-elect a pass were they to engage in this kind of secretive behavior?

Arthur was a Republican.

OK Genius, now tell us what channel CNN was on back in 1866.

Arthur was elected Vice President in the election of 1880, becoming president upon the assassination of Pres. Garfield.

CNN wasn't around back then but the New York Times and the Washington Post were.

Actually I was just joking about the media thing, but the fact that Arthur hid some of the facts relating to whether he was a "natural born citizen" is an important part of history.

Donofrio's case was that the British citizenship conferred on Obama (and Arthur) by their fathers made them ineligible under the natural-born citizen clause. Some people differ on whether this is true and as Donofrio's case was thrown out, his point has not yet been tested in court.

60 posted on 02/07/2009 12:24:56 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson