Posted on 11/26/2008 9:36:13 AM PST by pissant
The right-wing just won't let go of their "Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen" bit of nonsense. Today the Christiantist site World Net Daily is asking their readers to FedEx letters to the Supreme Court demanding they hold a hearing on the subject. They also want letters sent to Republican members of Congress saying, "Please hold congressional hearings to investigate whether Barack Obama meets the basic constitutional requirements for the highest office of the land."
They are also demanding that the members of the Electoral College prove Obama's citizenship before their December 15th vote that will officially make him president:
-----------------------
A one-time vice presidential candidate who is considered an expert on the U.S. Constitution says it is up the electors from the 50 states to make certain President-elect Barack Obama is a natural-born U.S. citizen before they cast votes for him in the Electoral College Dec. 15. If they do their duty, they would make sure that if they cast a vote for Mr. Obama, that Mr. Obama is a natural-born citizen," Herb Titus, the Constitution Party's running mate to Howard Phillips in 1996, told WND today.
(Excerpt) Read more at joemygod.blogspot.com ...
The real question is, what your doing on this guy’s website in the first place? Yuck
That, of course, would be a disaster. The Democrat electors would still get to vote on December 15th, and they would elect Hillary Rodham Clinton. And anybody who thinks that Mrs. Clinton would be preferable to President-elect Obama needs his or her head examined.
I guess you want to make America into a taliban style dictatorship (but with Christianity-which is totally different than Islam) if ALL you want to do is FOLLOW the Constitution: I think it’s the left that won’t “give up” the extremism, not us.
‘Christianist’? New to me......
Apparently Phillip Berg has converted to “Christianist”.
Interestingly enough the squealing of the left is growing noticably louder. I’m thinking they’re worried.
"With all this talk of the word "Christianist," I thought I'd do a Lexis/Nexis search to see how often it appears. In the Law Reviews & Journals database, "Christianist" (or "Christianists") is used only once, in an article by Robert J. Morris called "Intersections: Sexuality, Cultural Tradition, and the Law: Configuring the Bo(u)nds of Marriage: The Implications of Hawaiian Culture & Values for the Debate About Homogamy," 8 Yale J.L. & Human. 105 (1996)("Homogamy"? That's new to me.)"
More info at - http://althouse.blogspot.com/2006/11/christianist.html
The right-wing just won’t let go of their “Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen” bit of nonsense
Since they can’t produce a legit COLB they will go to the dem playbook of demonizing the opponent. It’s just an unproveable right-wing attack!
Clinton is far preferable to me.
The use of the term *Christianist* denotes a severe brain dysfunction.
;-)
Fags are the only ones who use it. Like the Andrew “Loafers” Sullivan.
see my post #11
BREAKING: People in pants Ramp Up Obama Birth Certificate Attacks...
I sort of agree, at least she won’t sell our country down the river as fast as Obama. She would probably be a lot tough internationally.
Are Christianists baptized, unlike a Christian like, say.... Obama?
It’s a namecalling technique to marginalize anyone with a different opinion.
That’s fine - as long as they don’t mind being called
Obamunists
for the next 4 years.
This story is not going away until this is proven.....
The use of the term *Christianist* denotes a severe brain dysfunction.
;-)
_____________________________________
It’s used in a derogatory way. Check out this troll site and you’ll understand. They HATE Christians and just ‘take the piss’.
http://truechristiansunite.yuku.com/
They are trying to be ‘Landover Baptist’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.