Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Must be an Andy Sullivan fellow traveler. Looks like one too.
1 posted on 11/26/2008 9:36:13 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: pissant

The real question is, what your doing on this guy’s website in the first place? Yuck


2 posted on 11/26/2008 9:39:06 AM PST by freeplancer (McCain Voters Catch the Lobsters-Obama Voters Eat Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
They are also demanding that the members of the Electoral College prove Obama's citizenship before their December 15th vote that will officially make him president:

That, of course, would be a disaster. The Democrat electors would still get to vote on December 15th, and they would elect Hillary Rodham Clinton. And anybody who thinks that Mrs. Clinton would be preferable to President-elect Obama needs his or her head examined.

3 posted on 11/26/2008 9:39:47 AM PST by presidio9 (I don't want to live in a world where Mike Mussina is a Hall of Famer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

I guess you want to make America into a taliban style dictatorship (but with Christianity-which is totally different than Islam) if ALL you want to do is FOLLOW the Constitution: I think it’s the left that won’t “give up” the extremism, not us.


4 posted on 11/26/2008 9:39:57 AM PST by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

‘Christianist’? New to me......


5 posted on 11/26/2008 9:40:43 AM PST by vimto (To do the right thing you don't have to be intelligent - you have to be brave (Sasz))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Apparently Phillip Berg has converted to “Christianist”.

Interestingly enough the squealing of the left is growing noticably louder. I’m thinking they’re worried.


6 posted on 11/26/2008 9:40:52 AM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
"Christianist"

"With all this talk of the word "Christianist," I thought I'd do a Lexis/Nexis search to see how often it appears. In the Law Reviews & Journals database, "Christianist" (or "Christianists") is used only once, in an article by Robert J. Morris called "Intersections: Sexuality, Cultural Tradition, and the Law: Configuring the Bo(u)nds of Marriage: The Implications of Hawaiian Culture & Values for the Debate About Homogamy," 8 Yale J.L. & Human. 105 (1996)("Homogamy"? That's new to me.)"

More info at - http://althouse.blogspot.com/2006/11/christianist.html

7 posted on 11/26/2008 9:41:19 AM PST by BossLady (Ok Everybody......Get Ready For ......'THE MOOD RING PRESIDENCY'......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

The right-wing just won’t let go of their “Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen” bit of nonsense

Since they can’t produce a legit COLB they will go to the dem playbook of demonizing the opponent. It’s just an unproveable right-wing attack!


8 posted on 11/26/2008 9:41:49 AM PST by rj45mis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

The use of the term *Christianist* denotes a severe brain dysfunction.

;-)


10 posted on 11/26/2008 9:42:03 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
11 posted on 11/26/2008 9:42:32 AM PST by frogjerk (Welcome|Goodbye to|from Free|Fairness Doctrine Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
What is the difference between a Christian and a Christianist?

Are Christianists baptized, unlike a Christian like, say.... Obama?

17 posted on 11/26/2008 9:45:40 AM PST by weegee (Sec. of State Clinton. What kind of change is it to keep the Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton Oligarchy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

“Today the Christiantist site World Net Daily “

uhm. Christianist. right.

that aside, don’t ever get added to world net daily’s email list. I have NO idea how I got on their list for every SINGLE email I have, but getting off is like cancelling AOL.

for crying out loud, leave me ALONE !


25 posted on 11/26/2008 9:54:02 AM PST by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
The right-wing just won't let go of their "Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen" bit of nonsense

Sure we will, show us a valid birth certificate, it is that simple.

26 posted on 11/26/2008 9:54:37 AM PST by SFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
There is only one rational explanation for why Obama had to date refused to make public his authenticated Birth Certificate.... He is hiding SOMETHING..

What could it be?

- His slut of a mother lied about who his father was.
- He birthplace would render him ineligible for the Presidency.
- ?????

If Obama is permitted to be inaugurated - without PROOF of natural born citizenship — then the DNC has shown once again their contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law....

28 posted on 11/26/2008 9:57:38 AM PST by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
"Joe.my.god"
 
Interesting URL.
 
Rainbow / Satanic Doctrine's focus is upon worshiping and indulging the self.
 
 
Christian Doctrine's focus is upon worshiping God and sacrificing the self - being reborn daily via Christ's sacrifice.
 
 
 

32 posted on 11/26/2008 10:05:33 AM PST by LomanBill (A bird flies because the right wing opposes the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Stupid Christians ... we’re always behind the PC times, and now we haven’t grown up enough to know the Constitutional requirements for president are obsolete. Stupid Christianists, we ...


36 posted on 11/26/2008 10:09:30 AM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

When a guy uses the term “Christiantist” its a sign that he is clueless.


38 posted on 11/26/2008 10:16:08 AM PST by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

On July 25th, 1787, John Jay wrote to George Washington, then Presiding Officer of the Constitutional Convention:

"“Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American Army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”

The Convention agreed and without debate the provision suggested by Jay was written into the Constitution.

That Jay’s advice was taken is not surprising because in his career Jay was President of the Continental Congress, Chief Justice of the New York Supreme Court, 1st Chief Justice of the United States, Ambassador to Spain and France, Secretary of Foreign Affairs (Secretary of State) and Governor of New York, among other things. He wasn’t a man whose advice could be ignored. Note that what particularly concerned Jay was not a political issue but a military issue arising because the President is Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States. He was bothered by issues of National Security."

41 posted on 11/26/2008 10:22:42 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

What is a “Christiantist” and why are the “Christiantists” the only ones concerned with preserving the Constitution? I’d like to sign up. Sounds like more look-mom-i-can-type-on-the-internet liberal blogging to me. Oh well ... no press on the issue is bad press.


43 posted on 11/26/2008 10:35:50 AM PST by so_real
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Must be an Andy Sullivan fellow traveler. Looks like one too.

I guess that makes him a penist, then.

44 posted on 11/26/2008 10:38:38 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

I’ve recently run across some interesting information concerning the O’s COLB and his BS issue. They are:

1. There are NO hospital records of his mother being admitted to have a baby during the time period of O’s virgin birth.

2. The O wrote in one of his books about his birth certificate decribing it in detail.

3. His almost daily press CONferences.

Number 2 struck me as odd unless you consider he knows there is an issue and he wants to address spin it early in an attempt to get some cover.

And when you notice his recent behaviour of trying to appear as if he is already running the country it may be an attwmpt to pressure to court to not rule against him.

And I hope the SCOTUS is not affected by a bunch of letters in ruling o an issue. Mob rule is very unsightly.

If SCOTUS fails to rule according the constitution there will be only one way remaining to secure our country.


45 posted on 11/26/2008 10:38:50 AM PST by stockpirate (Compassionate Conservatism = Republican Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson