Posted on 11/26/2008 9:36:13 AM PST by pissant
Well yes, but at least she would be legal. And we could always say she was selected, not elected.
All evidence points to Clinton being a terrible person. The same sort of evidenc points to Obama being a generally good person who is young naive and confused. Only a racist could prefer Clinton to Obama.
Only a racist liberal would think only a racist could prefer Hillary to Obama. Hillary may be the worst hag in the world and she’d still be preferable to the lying marxist racist POS.
The usage is noted in a William Safire "On Language" column on May 15, 2005:
"Two weeks after writing about the fervor of the late Terri Schiavo's ''Christianist 'supporters,''' Hendrik Hertzberg of The New Yorker last month described Representative Tom Delay as a ''hard-right Christianist crusader.'' A few months before, soon after President Bush was re-elected, the conservative Weekly Standard reported that an Ohio cartoonist had sent out a communication deploring ''militant Christianist Republicans.''
So apparently, you can use the term as you see fit.... ;)
“Today the Christiantist site World Net Daily “
uhm. Christianist. right.
that aside, don’t ever get added to world net daily’s email list. I have NO idea how I got on their list for every SINGLE email I have, but getting off is like cancelling AOL.
for crying out loud, leave me ALONE !
Sure we will, show us a valid birth certificate, it is that simple.
“Only a racist could prefer Clinton to Obama”
did you forget your sarcasm tag ?
ps. the word “racist” to me now has come to mean “someone I disagree with but can’t reason my way to a win”
What could it be?
- His slut of a mother lied about who his father was.
- He birthplace would render him ineligible for the Presidency.
- ?????
If Obama is permitted to be inaugurated - without PROOF of natural born citizenship — then the DNC has shown once again their contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law....
Clinton's machine was out matched and she has not said a word about his legitimacy or not.p> She is very quiet on this because he could hurt her chances of being appointed to the USSC. She don't want no Sec of State crap, she wants to be a USSC judge for life.
WorldNetDaily is also a forum for non-leftist Jews - therefore, are they "Jewists" or "Jewishists"?
Why is that? He's more of a narcissist than she is, that makes him potentially easier to influence.. IMO, she's a nasty lesbian-friendly ideologue, with laser like focus on all thats near and dear to the gender class warfare crowd.
Rainbow / Satanic Doctrine's focus is upon worshiping and indulging the self.Christian Doctrine's focus is upon worshiping God and sacrificing the self - being reborn daily via Christ's sacrifice.
That was sealed into fact forever with the Clinton senate impeachment vote. Nothing new here!
Since Obama’s campaign was one of three in his career that has taken advantage of the fact that the racial pump was primed by those who came before him and by his selection of his black self to represent his whole self, it is hardly likely that future historians will ignore this obvious characteristic.
If one thing has come out of this exercise in mountain-climbing by the molehill builders involved, it will be the the realization that the wisdom of the ages as it pertains to the futility of high-expectations will be proved immutable once again.
When the ranks of the typical black families catch on to what is truly happening here maybe even they will give up their love affair with this quite charming but insincere man.
Did you you mean that insult seriously? If so it is a shameful remark and you owe an apology.
Herding yourself along with the Liberals as they play the race card does a terrible disservice to this conservative forum and, by extension, to America. You ought to instantly withdraw that calumny.
Stupid Christians ... we’re always behind the PC times, and now we haven’t grown up enough to know the Constitutional requirements for president are obsolete. Stupid Christianists, we ...
Hillary’s running the show now anyway. Eclair’s cabinet is a bunch of Clintonistas. You didn’t think that Harlem meeting in early fall was simply a smoking session, do you?
When a guy uses the term “Christiantist” its a sign that he is clueless.
Geez, sounds like youre describing yourself. He's neither all that young or "naive". He's known what he wanted since he was 8 yrs old (ask Hitlery). All those "present" votes, establishing himself in Chicago with all the race pimps and their biggest advocates, the affirmative action appt to Harvard Law review and so on. Engineered with one thing in mind.
What we need is a Conservative Congress to keep him in check, which unfortunately Bush almost went out of his way to make sure we wouldnt have.
By using the term “Christianist” they’re striking back at those who call the One a socialist or stalinist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.