OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY: The SMOKING GUN has been found!

The Greater Evil ^ | 07/27/08 | Polarik

[Polarik]

Sometimes, you don't always find what it is that you're seeking on the Internet. At least, not when you could have really used it.

I decided today to search through the web archives to locate other COLB images that have not been seen since their original posting. What I found was downright shocking!

First, props to Brian Ledbetter and his blog, The Snapped Shot, for providing both the references to my original, June 20 post, and for providing what was presented as "proof positive" that the Kos image was genuine. The "proof" provided was an animated GIF showing the DeCosta COLB morphing into the Kos COLB.



The conclusion reached by the eager detractors and debunkers of my theories was that the similarities between the two prove that both images are genuine, and that all of the differences I found in the Kos image -- the anomalies of the text -- were, and I quote:

"inconsistencies that've been pointed out can now be attributed to scanning/copying/encoding/transmission artifacts."

Or, the SOS, the same old stuff that every detractor has tried to postulate as the only reasons for the vagaries of the Kos.


A light went off in my head, and lights were flashing.

Unwittingly, the creator of this GIF just provided me with the smoking gun I needed that conclusively proves my theory!

After cropping both the Kos image and the DeCosta image down to just the outer edges of the borders, I decreaed them proportionately to 921 x 903 pixels each.

First, the Decosta image:

 



Now the Kos image:

 




To make my case even stronger, I performed Sobel edge detection on each image, and then created an animated GIF from both to demonstrate the closeness of the alignment.

They overlapped perfectly. Presenting, the DE-KOS-TA composite:


 





OK, like what are the odds of having two COLBs, one that we know was from Sep 9, 2002, and one that was 'allegedly' from June 9, 2007, with different border patterns, lining up perfectly on the placements of the borders, images, headers & footers, text fields, and data fields?

Like the odds of winning the lottery.

What are the odds that the Kos image was manufactured directly from the DeCosta image?

Take the odds! You'll win every time.

For comparison purposes, here is a composite of the DeCosta image with an overlay of Michele's image (another genuine COLB):




As you can see, although the top of the COLB image is similarly placed -- which is what you would expect it to be -- there is quite a difference in the placement of the text, which is also expected given the different time periods in which they were originally produced.

But, what is not expected are the anomalies in the Kos image. From where did the other date come? Why does it seem like the 'hidden seal' on the Kos image is smaller and shifted up and to the left relative to the DeCosta image? Why is the date stamp on the Kos in a different place? Why does this date stamp look so prominent on the Kos when the 'hidden seal' is hardly visible?" Why is the font of the Kos date stamp different from the DeCosta date stamp when everything else is the same?

These questions certainly do not detract from the fact that the DeCosta image served as the basis for the Kos, but it raises the question as to whether there was a second COLB -- one that could have been Obama's -- but contained information that he did not want to release to the public.

After all, the first one used for the forgery belonged to someone other than Obama.

Since I created my Kos clone to be the same size as the Kos, there is no doubt that an enlarged copy of the smaller DeCosta image became the "canvas" for the Kos "original. Then, copious amounts of cutting and pasting from another COLB's background was done to cover up the existing information, followed by typing directly onto the copied background while in Photoshop, or another image editor.

The bottom line is that the Kos was never a true copy of Obama's birth record, if it ever existed as a COLB. There is nothing to rule out the copying of parts from a second COLB (such as the background, seal stamp, and date stamp) belonging to someone other than Obama.


To me, this case is closed.


Now, the only thing left for me to do is to follow the same procedure I used to create the Kos clone shown in my previous post (which was made from Michele's COLB) by using the Decosta COLB as the starting point for the Kos clone.

THEN, we can now bid adieu to the doubters, the detractors, and the debunkers who were way off course with their rebuttals, and welcome back the faithful who never waivered from that nagging feeling that what they were looking at, was a fake!

All hail the DE-KOS-TA image.

[cynwoody]

I thought the DeCosta image came available after the Kos image?

Patricia DeCosta (1930-1963)

Her COLB is also found at the above genealogical link.

[Spunky]

"Once again, the blacked-out certificate number speaks volumes. If nothing else, everyone should demand that Obama provide that. It will provide the date the certificate was filed and provide a reference against which the accuracy of the rest of the document can be validated.

The date the certificates are "Filed" or "Accepted" are down in the lower left.

We have seen enough Hawaiian birth certificates now to know that the certificate numbers show (probably county no.) as those that are visible all have 151 as the first number. The second set of numbers are the date of their birth. DeCostas is 151 1930 (last numbers show on DeCostas also but I don't see them on this one) So because of this we have determined Baracks would be 151 1961 ----- but have no idea what the last numbers would be. We have determined that they are probably sequence numbers and that is why they can't show any numbers on Baracks. Because it is a forgery.

[pissant]

It matters very much that this idiot put a forgery on his website. We are going to nail his balls to the wall.

[Calpernia]

bttt

[Spunky]

What a beautiful woman. So sad that she was taken so young and leaving behind 3 beautiful little girls.

[bossmechanic]

It does. Go back to your homemade candles and incense. Peace be with you.

[Fred]

If this turns out to be true, all it means is that the SHEDEVIL HRC takes the slot, forget it!!!

[Jess Kitting]

There seems to be a problem with the "original" DeCosta Birth Certificate.

It is lists the birth date as May 14, 1930 and the date of registration as May 27, 1930. It also has a seal from the "State of Hawaii" 1959. How can this be an original birth certificate dated 1930 when Hawaii was not a even a state until 1959?

[bvw]

Only thirty! A beautiful young woman. And a great photo, too.

Still I do not see that the issue of chicken and egg is settled wrt/ the two CoLBs.

[ovrtaxt]

Nightcrawler can't be president either, he was born in Germany.

Yeah, but he's got black skin. Don't get so hung up on that Constitution thing, we need CHANGE. /s

[wtc911]

You haven't been in many male locker rooms, have you? While most white males are circumcised, a number are not; and I would say that a significantly higher percentage of black males are not.

__________________________________________________

Where do you spend your free time?

[Polarik]

The COLB is a transcript of a birth record on file. Decosts’a COLB was printed and certified on September 9, 2002. The date of birth is just part of the birth record on file.

[bvw]

But when was DeCosta’s CoLB scanned and posted on the internet?

[Polarik]

Still I do not see that the issue of chicken and egg is settled wrt/ the two CoLB

Consider that there has been only one (1) allegedly genuine copy of OBama's COLB with zero (0) evidence to back it up. Not even a statement from Obama attesting to its "authenticity."

Meanwhile, the evidence that it is not genuineis overwhelming and substantial -- as good as one can get with a JPG image. No other COLB has a border that even modestly resembles it, yet the body of it fits a COLB from 5 years prior.

IT's a slam-dunk.

[Polarik]

If this turns out to be true, all it means is that the SHEDEVIL HRC takes the slot, forget it!!!

Technically true, BUT could the Dems take a hit like that and still be credible in November?

[Little Ray]

Does it really matter? Obama is a Democrat and a “minority.” If all this were true, the law STILL wouldn’t apply to him. In fact in DUmmyland, this would be a “resume-enhancer.”

[aruanan]

Was Obama circumcised? This would tell if his father intended to raise him as a Muslim.

No, it wouldn't. Many non-Muslim African boys are circumcised.

[Polarik]

Maya gave an interview to some magazine saying she was born in Java; but there is a copy of a Birth Certificate in the TD post showing a birth in Hawaii in 1971
Obama’s mother was fluent in the maneuverings to establish citizenship even when her child was born out of the country. Now, THAT’s a smoking gun.

Different gun. Different target. AND, lying to the media is a family tradition.

[Polarik]

Thanks, Fred. Someone asked when DeCosta’s COLB was posted. The site owner said it’s been posted for three or four years. Hard to argue with that. The only thing I can say for sure is that the sote entry was not mopdifed later than Jan 28 of this year.

[Polarik]

But when was DeCosta’s CoLB scanned and posted on the internet?

See my reply to Fred Nerks