All European Life Died In Auschwitz

Israel Science and Technology Homepage ^ | November 21, 2004 | Sebastián Vivar Rodríguez

[FARS]

I walked down the street in Barcelona, and suddenly discovered a terrible truth - Europe died in Auschwitz.

We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20 million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a culture, thought, creativity, talent. We destroyed the chosen people, truly chosen, because they produced great and wonderful people who changed the world.

The contribution of this people is felt in all areas of life: science, art, international trade, and above all, as the conscience of the world. These are the people we burned.

And under the pretense of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove to ourselves that we were cured of the disease of racism, we opened our gates to 20 million Muslims, who brought us stupidity and ignorance, religious extremism and lack of tolerance, crime and poverty due to an unwillingness to work and support their families with pride.

They have turned our beautiful Spanish cities into the third world, drowning in filth and crime.

Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the government, they plan the murder and destruction of their naive hosts.

And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for fanatical hatred, creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for backwardness and superstition.

We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of Europe and their talent for hoping for a better future for their children, their determined clinging to life because life is holy, for those who pursue death, for people consumed by the desire for death for themselves and others, for our children and theirs.

What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe.

PROPOSED Constitutional Amendment to avoid encountering this situation in the USA:

28th Consitutional Amendment

[devolve]

LOL!

Eye knew yu gnu I new ewe'd like that!

[potlatch]

Lol, I don't have a 'gnu' or a 'ewe' to post but 'U - New'!

[Tax Government]

I would suggest that Jews quit obsessing over the "Holocaust" and get their minds in the present day.

You need a rock-solid justification for asking Jewish poeple to forget the slaughter...such as being Jewish youself. No need to reply.

[MelonFarmerJ]

Much of European culture today is simply staring into the abyss, seeing nothing worth saving or caring about. They like their little pleasures, but not enough to defend them

I agree. For starters, there is a statue honoring the world's oldest profession going up in the Netherlands, and last I heard, there is a "comfort station" (AKA house of prostition) planned at Schipol Airport Amsterdam for weary travelers.....really uplifting stuff.

[AmericanArchConservative]

Interesting points...

except - I believe the one you indicate regarding religion - the "establishment clause" so-called...

Does not prohibit discrimination against mohammadanism. The truth about the intent of the Founding Fathers is that they wrote that clause specifically to keep any particular sect, or denomination of Christianity from gaining preeminence or favour in the political arena, and consequently using its clout to create a more favourable environment for its own proselytizing, profit and growth, and/or a less favourable one for competing Christian churches. Bear in mind the oppressive environment that many settlers fled in N. Europe

At the time that was drafted, the religion of the colonies/budding states was presumptively Christian. By Population, 96% Christian of various sects or denoms, about 2 to 3% were Jewish, and the remainder were nonbelievers.

Among the first military campaigns mounted by the fledgling country were the battles against the Barbary pirates of Algiers and Morocco - treacherous mohammadan scum who waylaid American merchant ships, captured the seamen and sold many into slavery, held others until the us government paid a ransom equal to one fifth of the total federal budget at the time.

The USS Constitution, and the US Marines were created specifically to deal with those threats. "From the Halls of Montezuma, to the shores of Tripoli..." It was the Moslem Barbary pirates on those shores of Tripoli.

Jffferson and those others who wrote our Constitution were acutely aware of recent history in Europe - they were students of history, far more than any of our current pathetic crop are!

It had only been {I believe} 1783 when Mustafa had led the last horde of moslem invaders to arms against Northern Europe, and been rebuffed one last time. Some have called Jefferson a "Deist" rather than a Christian, and much has been made recently of the fact that he owned a copy of the qur'an.

I take it as an indication that Jefferson - who was one of the most intelligent and most educated men of his day, as well as one of the most intelligent Presidents in our history - was exercising intellectual curiosity, and comparing the claims of islam to those of Judaism and Christianity.

My contention is that if Jefferson had believed islam to be a credible or true religion, one which actually did worship and follow the same deity as Judaism or Christianity - he would have incorporated that knowledge into the Constitution in very specific terms, would have made certain it was protected on a par with the other two.

I believe whether mohammadanism is to be considered a religion or not - it was not on a par with Judaism or Christianity in the US, and should rightly never be! That includes affording them the protections under the law that the rest of us have.

It should be clear enough from history how islam has treated Jews and Christians - as second class citizens - even in their own countries once islam had strength of numbers, and/or military/political supremacy - that they likely have every intent of trying to replicate those results and reducing us to an extinct, or highly overtaxed dhimmi class - suffered to live so long as our moslem masters felt themselves sufficiently appeased.

That clarity ought to dictate our policy: moslems in our land are second class citizens - never more than that at best, until the day they forswear all their allegiance to jihad, allegiance to imams and mullahs, their demands for sharia law to govern anything at all.

We cannot allow them to use our own Constitution against us. It will be the death of the Constitution,and of ourselves if we fail.

A.A.C.

"The Final Crusade has commenced: Preserve, protect and defend our Constitution, whatever the cost!"

[NZerFromHK]

Being brainwashed with their (to me) strange ideology and religion they were unable to understand that nearly nobody (including me) was really interested into their message.

I'm not Mormon but a typical evangelical Christian in the Billy Graham mold - just like most of the rest of Asian Christians are, but I can't stop reminding myself of the following Bible verses when I see what you wrote above:

Have I committed an offence in abasing myself that ye might be exalted, because I have preached to you the gospel of God freely? - 2 Corinthians 11:7

Yup. Most of us Europeans like our way of sex and we do not want to adopt your personal lifestlye. Since you as a person can not represent America as a whole I also can not represent my continent of course. But let me say that much: Yes I for my part like sex and I think that lust is a gift of God that has to be apprechiated.

But fornication and all uncleanness or covetousness, let it not even be named among you, as is fitting for saints; neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor coarse jesting, which are not fitting, but rather giving of thanks. For this you know, that no fornicator, unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. - Ephesians 5:3-5

[Atlantic Bridge]

Have I committed an offence in abasing myself that ye might be exalted, because I have preached to you the gospel of God freely? - 2 Corinthians 11:7

No offence. Nevertheless those 2 Mormons didn't preach the gospel of God, they preached their own -strange- religion and values that are both different to the kind of Christianity I was taught when I was younger. It had nothing to do with the loving God I know. Their idol was a boring chastiser. To me they appeared like two convinced but false prophets.

But fornication and all uncleanness or covetousness, let it not even be named among you, as is fitting for saints; neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor coarse jesting, which are not fitting, but rather giving of thanks. For this you know, that no fornicator, unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God.

Do you think that sexuality in Europe is unclean, fornication, fitlthy etc. etc. etc.? I would think twice before I would answer this question if I were you.

[dennisw]

They killed off their Jews and brought in five times as many Muslims. STOOOPID STOOOPID STOOOPID

[NZerFromHK]

I'm with you on the first point. Nevertheless, all I come up is that as Christians, preaching the gospel to anyone whom we know haven't heard the true gospel yet is one of the most fundamental idea. I think your word seemed to imply that preaching our belief is wrong. If you don't mean it, then my apologies over this.

The second point is even more explicit. No pre-marital sex, no extra-marital sex (adultery), no homosexual sex, no divorce on a whim and then wanton re-marriage, and churches in Asia are very orthodox on this area.

[Atlantic Bridge]

I'm with you on the first point. Nevertheless, all I come up is that as Christians, preaching the gospel to anyone whom we know haven't heard the true gospel yet is one of the most fundamental idea. I think your word seemed to imply that preaching our belief is wrong. If you don't mean it, then my apologies over this.

No apologies nessecary - we are simply discussing a tricky issue. Personally I also tried to convince other people of the good message (in the way I understand it) in the past. I think I even had sucess with it. Therefore I do not believe that preaching for God is wrong. Nevertheless I totally dismiss all those things that are apart from the good message. I.e. the book of mormon, charismatic ramba-zamba that has nothing to do with a good belief or making sexuality the by far most important issue of the bible. The thing I have a real problem with are wrong prophets.

The second point is even more explicit. No pre-marital sex, no extra-marital sex (adultery), no homosexual sex, no divorce on a whim and then wanton re-marriage, and churches in Asia are very orthodox on this area.

1 Corinthians 13:1-13

If I speak in the tongues of men and angels, but have not love, I have become sounding brass or a tinkling symbol.

And if I have prophecy and know all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing.

And if I dole out all my goods, and if I deliver my body that I may boast but have not love, nothing I am profited.

Love is long suffering, love is kind, it is not jealous, love does not boast, it is not inflated.

It is not discourteous, it is not selfish, it is not irritable, it does not enumerate the evil. It does not rejoice over the wrong, but rejoices in the truth

It covers all things, it has faith for all things, it hopes in all things, it endures in all things.

Love never falls in ruins; but whether prophecies, they will be abolished; or tongues, they will cease; or knowledge, it will be superseded.

For we know in part and we prophecy in part.

But when the perfect comes, the imperfect will be superseded.

When I was an infant, I spoke as an infant, I reckoned as an infant;

when I became [an adult], I abolished the things of the infant.

For now we see through a mirror in an enigma, but then face to face. Now I know in part, but then I shall know as also I was fully known.

But now remains faith, hope, love,

these three;

but the greatest of these is love.

As long as we follow the words of the bible we do not have to fear anything. Sex and love are a gift of God and therefore we should appreciate and use it responsible. That is - btw. - what most people in Europe do.

I also dismiss extra-marital sex (adultery), homosexual sex or casual marriage. On the other hand I think that the solely orientation of some churches in the US and elsewhere on this issue is pure hypocrisy. I.e. those public vows of teens to stay abstinent (or their public confessions if they failed...) must be the idea of some old drooly perverts. The pure disgusting draft for uptight auto-erotic that has nothing to do with the message of our Heavenly Father. We have to tell our children the rights and wrongs - no doubt about that - but there are also things that have to remain within the direct relationship between God and man.

[SatinDoll]

No, he didn’t join them. He recognized Islam is unconstitutional, that all its tenets violate the U.S.Constitution.

[Clintonfatigued]

This is so true. In some ways, we continue to feel the toxic effects of what happened back then.

[Jacquerie]

And France and England expelled Jews a couple hundred years before Spain. What is your point?

[george76]

History of Jihad against the Egyptian Coptic Christians (640)

http://www.historyofjihad.org/egypt.html

[Yaelle]

The hell with you, Europe, for figuring it out so late.

[FARS]

I saw the ping to me from Yaelle with today’s date and wondered why. I had not posted any article yet there it was as posted by me. Again , I thought my mind was playing tricks until I saw the posting date: back in 2007! Then thought I must be hallucinating.

Don’t do drugs, am not drinking so how did a post from over two years ago suddenly reappear? I’m still not sure who found it and put it up again. But, glad you liked it enough.

BTW - got a heads up the Stratfor subscription newsletter (I cannot afford to join) has pretty much confirmed that Khamenei is in a coma. I have not seen it but the notice3 was sent ot me to add credence to my previous oosts.

Also, one of my Iran sources, which had denied Khamenei was in dire medical condition called yesterday and said I had been right and he was wrong and Khameniei was either dead or in an irreversable coma.

Meanwhile a pro-Mullah visitor to AntiMullah called Therese left a message that Alan was a lunatic and Khamenei was fine and had been photographed with a visiting head of state just the other day. They regime there is getting a bit desperate and putting up an easily falsifiable smoke screen.

Like teh Oba-Hussein COLB

Sounds like the B.S. disinformation the Dems are putting out about everything trying to fool “we the people” into disaster after disaster.

[TigersEye]

It’s the same old thread. No one put it up again.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[FARS]

So someone found it after all these years (original story goes back to 2004) posted by me in 2007 and brought it forward to today by posting a comment? Interesting.

BTW parts of Google Blogger are down and cannot be accessed.

AntiMullah is among the ones down. I thought it was the article that was being written but apparently lots of people cannot access their blogs and they won’t come up

[Enterprise]

I remember this article. It made a very powerful point and that point is still valid. Glad to read it again.