Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Open Letter To Rush Limbaugh
Jon Alvarez ^ | 10/23/2006 | Jon Alvarez

Posted on 10/24/2006 5:24:00 AM PDT by Jon Alvarez

Dear Rush:

Pardon my French, but you’re full of s***! As I listened to your show last week, you chose to criticize and attack conservative Americans like myself who feel the Republican Party does not deserve to win in November. Rush, since when did you become such a shill for the GOP? Choosing the party over the base is a very disappointing move to this long time listener. I’m very disappointed in you, Rush Limbaugh, you’ve lost touch with the reality that is life for the common man in America. I heartily recommend you take pause and reconsider your programming strategy. Do you really want to attack those of us on the front lines versus liberalism? Rush, you yourself have become one of the elite of our society. Perhaps I need to give you some perspective, so you can better understand our anger, or at least mine.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bravosierra; bushbots; bushkennedyeducation; cheezeandwhine; crybaby; cutandrun; cutandruncons; cutnrunconservative; cutoffnosetospite; defeatocrat; demorepublicans; dhimmiintraining; dramaqueens; dummie; fascism; freetravismcgee; growapair; humprove; idiot; ilikewhiskey; internationalist; iwantspeakerpelosi; jonlovesmurtha; jonluvssanfrannan; jonsupportsdems; logicalfallacy; looser; murthaconservatives; nation; openborderhacks; openborderlobby; plutocracy; redchinahugochavez; redchinawalmart; repubstatists; rinohumpers; rinowimps; rovehumpers; rushisapartyhack; rushisright; rushlimbaugh; rushlimpballs; savagefan; savagesupporter; seminarposter; serieslooser; sowhoneedsya; spoiledchild; statists; stopdemopublicans; surrendermonkey; trueconservative; wankingwhiners; warnotpoliceaction; whatconstitution; whiner; whiningwankers; wussysissyboy; yawnvannity; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 501-509 next last
To: RockinRight
Using your method we might be on fire before we can do anything about it.

Maybe, maybe not.

Your way, no doubt about it.

IMO, you will never get what you want by voting for what you do not want.

"If you always do what you have always done, you will always get what you have always gotten."

Voting for liberals to get more conservative is a bizarre concept in my view.

421 posted on 10/24/2006 2:05:26 PM PDT by Protagoras (If you take baby steps toward hell, sooner or later your shoes will be on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

Voting for conservatives who have as much of a chance to get elected as the Browns have of winning the Super Bowl to get more conservative is a pretty bizzare concept in MY view.


422 posted on 10/24/2006 2:06:43 PM PDT by RockinRight (Maintaining a Republican majority is MORE IMPORTANT than your temper tantrum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

Good riddance to him.


423 posted on 10/24/2006 2:12:20 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

LOL!Thanks for making me choke on and inhale soda up my nose.


424 posted on 10/24/2006 2:16:58 PM PDT by darkangel82 (Higher visibility leads to greater zottability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

May I interject to you Mr Alvarez, post 1 through 50.

Now go to your room, time out!


425 posted on 10/24/2006 2:28:01 PM PDT by buck61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: buck61

Looks like he's gotten more than a time out.


426 posted on 10/24/2006 2:44:27 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (A living insult to islam since 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: Jon Alvarez

Ping for very interesting reading later. ;)


427 posted on 10/24/2006 3:26:07 PM PDT by Chani (Life is fatal. The 100% statistic is compelling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Why would someone willing to fork over dollars to a multi millionaire, to hear his opinions, consider themselves a conservative. I would call them a fool.


428 posted on 10/24/2006 3:34:57 PM PDT by jeremiah (So shall it be written, so shall it be done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jon Alvarez

You echo my sentiments. I don't see how those Republicans that are worried about losing control of the reins of power, refuse to see the solution. You, or I aren't saying vote for the Democrat over the Republican in every case. I am going to vote for the challenger in every case, unless they are completely unqualified or whacked out. That is my policy from now on, as a matter of fact, that was my modus operandi before I started voted straight R in '92 till the present. The Republicans brought me in with their rhetoric of smaller govt, return to constitutional limits and family values. They lost me when they went against their own words.


429 posted on 10/24/2006 3:39:55 PM PDT by jeremiah (So shall it be written, so shall it be done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jon Alvarez
Your letter, unfortunately, reeks of emotional blackmail. Meaning? It's not intellectual nor substantive.

Understand here, I do, that your emotions are involved. Totally understandable.

430 posted on 10/24/2006 3:40:04 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jon Alvarez

Stamping your feet and acting churlish is no way to think clearly.

I am pissed at the Republicans as well, for many of the reasons stated, but fully realize that the traitor rats winning anything is far and away more destructive than the reps staying in power.

I chose to work within the Republican Party to formulate change. I have been a Precinct stalwart for many years, beginning by working on Ronald Reagan's campaign in 1980. I have been a County delegate many times and a State delegate a few times. We have done well in Texas.

Re-think your strategy, sport. Sit down. Breathe. Have a beer.


431 posted on 10/24/2006 3:48:19 PM PDT by BrewingFrog (I brew, therefore I am!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: jeremiah
You are just another troll.

Dont waste my time.
432 posted on 10/24/2006 3:48:26 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Being a Liberal is just a coping mechanism for low self esteem and/or bad parenting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: BrewingFrog; Pukin Dog

I just noticed the odd linkage between your FReeper names. Brewing Frog - Pukin Dog...

I'm sorry - just bored...


433 posted on 10/24/2006 3:53:38 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

When I give my honest opinion I am a troll? You are a jonny come lately, green behind the ears, haven't gotten past spankinit newcomer. My opinion, as well as anyone elses that puts together the thought a time to express it, deserves a thoughtful response, or to be ignored. Leave the name calling to the Dems....(which going by the amount on this site lately, is now part and parcel of Libsareus.


434 posted on 10/24/2006 3:59:56 PM PDT by jeremiah (So shall it be written, so shall it be done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: jeremiah
Troll, troll, TROLL.

Don't bother me again. Have your opinion if you want. No matter how stupid it is. Its your right. Now, leave me alone. TROLL.
435 posted on 10/24/2006 4:01:47 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Being a Liberal is just a coping mechanism for low self esteem and/or bad parenting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: jeremiah
"You echo my sentiments."

Might want to be careful who you agree wholeheartedly with.
There are some who honestly take this nut seriously.
Then there's this bit of DU propaganda as well.
Point being, again, be careful who you are agreeing with.

436 posted on 10/24/2006 4:16:52 PM PDT by Darksheare (Please, don't pinch the alias.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty

somebody call the Whambulance. Whine one one.


437 posted on 10/24/2006 4:19:17 PM PDT by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0
>> "Or there might be something else you meant...?"

> As recently stated by numerous posters this site is "conservative" only during the primaries. After than it's the vote republican fearmongering, or else one is a DU troll, cun'trunner, want's Pelosi as speaker or Hillary etc. I don't vote out of fear. I vote for who I think is the best candidate that shares my views as a conservative. If there's an alternative to a liberal RINO, I'm voting for them.

Ah, I see I misunderstood your original comment about FR being a Republican site. My apologies for jumping to the improper conclusion.

> Funny thought, the only race of consequense on my ballot in Nov. is Vernon Robinson, a fire breathing controversial conservative congressional candidate that has the non support of many NC republicans on this board because of his campaign ads.

I just read over his bio page on Wikipedia, and he sounds like quite a fire-breathing character indeed. I rather wish some of our races (in NY) were as colorful. The black Jesse Helms -- I love it!

438 posted on 10/24/2006 4:45:58 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
All you have to do is say what you really think, Prot.

Most of us have the courage to do that without the endless game playing and picture posting you do.

I've asked you before, but you've been too afraid to answer the very direct, and relevant question.

What is your definition of 'liberal?' You keep repeating ad nauseum that you won't vote for criminals or liberals (with the implication that the rest of us would), but you refuse to define your terms. I call that cowardice.

And don't give me that "You call me names" garbage. You've called me the worst names in the book.....so don't even go there.

439 posted on 10/24/2006 5:11:37 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Cut and Run Murtha Conservatives are gonna sit out this election. Patriots aren't!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: Hoodlum91; Protagoras
Has the prot ever defined 'liberal?'

He's a dancer Hoodlum.........afraid to take a stand so that he can mock others.

If nothing else, he's consistent.......consistently evasive.

440 posted on 10/24/2006 5:13:29 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Cut and Run Murtha Conservatives are gonna sit out this election. Patriots aren't!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 501-509 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson